<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org">
<title>Physical Therapy current issue</title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org</link>
<description>Physical Therapy RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1538-6724</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Feb  1 2010 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Physical Therapy</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0031-9023</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/142?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/146?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/149?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/157?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/174?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/177?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/187?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/224?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/235?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/237?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/240?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/252?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/261?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/269?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/280?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/289?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/307?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/307-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/308?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/310?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/312?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Physical Therapy</title>
<url>http://ptjournal.apta.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/142?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Jacquelin Perry, 9 Feet Tall]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/142?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craik, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, All Editorials, Rebecca Craik]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2010.90.2.142</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Jacquelin Perry, 9 Feet Tall]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>145</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/146?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/146?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eng, J. J., Mulroy, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Rebecca Craik]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2010.90.2.146</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>148</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>146</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/149?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sit-to-Stand Movement as a Performance-Based Measure for Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/149?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Functional recovery of patients after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) usually is measured with questionnaires. However, these self-report measures assess the patient's perspective on his or her ability to perform a task. Performance-based tests are needed to assess the patient's actual ability to perform a task.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The main purpose of this study was to quantify improvement in performance of the sit-to-stand movement of patients with a TKA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design and Methods</b></st>
<p>In this prospective study of 16 patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis followed by a TKA, the maximal knee angular extension velocity and amount of unloading (shifting weight) of the affected leg during the sit-to-stand movement and the visual analog scale score for pain were assessed preoperatively and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. These data were compared with data for a control group of individuals who were healthy (n=27).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Before surgery, the participants in the TKA group unloaded their affected leg, but within 6 months after implantation, the affected leg was almost fully loaded again and comparable to the loading symmetry ratio of the control group. Furthermore, knee extension velocity also had increased, but remained lower than that of the control group. The changes in knee extension velocity took place during the first 6 months, after which a plateau was visible.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>A potential limitation of the study design was that the patients were not perfectly matched with the control subjects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Implantation of a total knee prosthesis partly improved performance of the sit-to-stand movement. Participants in the TKA group could fully load their operated leg, but they could not generate enough knee angular velocity during rising compared with the control group.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boonstra, M. C., Schwering, P. J.A., De Waal Malefijt, M. C., Verdonschot, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Injuries and Conditions: Knee, Tests and Measurements]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090119</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sit-to-Stand Movement as a Performance-Based Measure for Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>156</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/157?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dynamic Principles of Gait and Their Clinical Implications]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/157?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A healthy gait pattern depends on an array of biomechanical features, orchestrated by the central nervous system for economy and stability. Injuries and other pathologies can alter these features and result in substantial gait deficits, often with detrimental consequences for energy expenditure and balance. An understanding of the role of biomechanics in the generation of healthy gait, therefore, can provide insight into these deficits. This article examines the basic principles of gait from the standpoint of dynamic walking, an approach that combines an inverted pendulum model of the stance leg with a pendulum model of the swing leg and its impact with the ground. The heel-strike at the end of each step has dynamic effects that can contribute to a periodic gait and its passive stability. Biomechanics, therefore, can account for much of the gait pattern, with additional motor inputs that are important for improving economy and stability. The dynamic walking approach can predict the consequences of disruptions to normal biomechanics, and the associated observations can help explain some aspects of impaired gait. This article reviews the basic principles of dynamic walking and the associated experimental evidence for healthy gait and then considers how the principles may be applied to clinical gait pathologies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuo, A. D., Donelan, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090125</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dynamic Principles of Gait and Their Clinical Implications]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>174</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/174?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/174?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eng, J. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090125.ic</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>176</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/177?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How Does Explicit Prioritization Alter Walking During Dual-Task Performance? Effects of Age and Sex on Gait Speed and Variability]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/177?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Previous studies have demonstrated that the performance of a secondary task during walking alters gait.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>This study investigated the effects of task prioritization on walking in young and older adults to evaluate the "default" prioritization scheme used, the flexibility to alter prioritization and cortical resources allocated to gait and a secondary cognitive task, and any age-associated changes in these abilities.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>A cross-sectional study that explicitly altered the focus of attention was used to investigate the effects of prioritization in young and older adults who were healthy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>Gait speed and gait variability were evaluated in young adults (n=40) and older adults (n=17) who were healthy, both during usual walking and under 3 dual-task conditions: (1) no specific prioritization instructions, (2) prioritization of gait, and (3) prioritization of the cognitive task.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Young adults significantly increased gait speed in the gait prioritization condition compared with gait speed in the no-instruction condition; a similar tendency was seen in the older adults. Gait speed was reduced when priority was given to the cognitive task in both age groups; however, this effect was less dramatic in the older adults. In the young adults, prioritization of gait tended to have different effects on gait speed among both men and women. In the older adults, but not in the young adults, all dual-task conditions produced increased gait variability, whereas prioritization did not alter this gait feature.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>The sample size and the relative homogeneity of the older adults could be considered as possible limitations of the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Even among young adults, the effects of secondary, cognitive tasks on gait speed are strongly influenced by prioritization. This finding was less significant in the older adults, suggesting that there is an age-associated decline in the ability to flexibly allocate attention to gait. Somewhat surprisingly, when prioritization was not explicitly instructed, gait speed in both young and older adults most closely resembled that of the condition when they were instructed to focus attention on the cognitive task.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yogev-Seligmann, G., Rotem-Galili, Y., Mirelman, A., Dickstein, R., Giladi, N., Hausdorff, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Motor Control and Motor Learning, Geriatrics: Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How Does Explicit Prioritization Alter Walking During Dual-Task Performance? Effects of Age and Sex on Gait Speed and Variability]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>186</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>177</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/187?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neurophysiologic and Rehabilitation Insights From the Split-Belt and Other Locomotor Adaptation Paradigms]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/187?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Locomotion is incredibly flexible. Humans are able to stay upright and navigate long distances in the face of ever-changing environments and varied task demands, such as walking while carrying a heavy object or in thick mud. The focus of this review is a behavior that is critical for this flexibility: motor adaptation. <I>Adaptation</I> is defined here as the process of adjusting a movement to new demands through trial-and-error practice. A key feature of adaptation is that more practice without the new demand is required to return the movement to its original state. Thus, motor adaptation is a short-term motor learning process. Several studies have been undertaken to determine how humans adapt walking to novel circumstances. Many of these studies have examined locomotor adaptation using a split-belt treadmill. The results of these studies of people who were healthy and people with neurologic damage suggest that the cerebellum is required for normal adaptation of walking and that the role of cerebral structures may be less critical. They also suggest that intersegmental and interlimb coordination is critical but readily adaptable to accommodate changes in the environment. Locomotor adaptation also can be used to determine the walking potential of people with specific neurologic deficits. For instance, split-belt and limb-weighting locomotor adaptation studies show that adults with chronic stroke are capable of improving weight-bearing and spatiotemporal symmetry, at least temporarily. Our challenge as rehabilitation specialists is to intervene in ways that maximize this capacity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reisman, D. S., Bastian, A. J., Morton, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Anatomy: Central Nervous System and Neuromuscular System, Motor Control and Motor Learning]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090073</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neurophysiologic and Rehabilitation Insights From the Split-Belt and Other Locomotor Adaptation Paradigms]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Meaningful Gait Speed Improvement During the First 60 Days Poststroke: Minimal Clinically Important Difference]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>When people with stroke recover gait speed, they report improved function and reduced disability. However, the minimal amount of change in gait speed that is clinically meaningful and associated with an important difference in function for people poststroke has not been determined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for comfortable gait speed (CGS) associated with an improvement in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score for people between 20 to 60 days poststroke.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>This was a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>The participants in this study were 283 people with first-time stroke prospectively enrolled in the ongoing Locomotor Experience Applied Post Stroke (LEAPS) multi-site randomized clinical trial. Comfortable gait speed was measured and mRS scores were obtained at 20 and 60 days poststroke. Improvement of &ge;1 on the mRS was used to detect meaningful change in disability level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Mean (SD) CGS was 0.18 (0.16) m/s at 20 days and 0.39 (0.22) m/s at 60 days poststroke. Among all participants, 47.3% experienced an improvement in disability level &ge;1. The MCID was estimated as an improvement in CGS of 0.16 m/s anchored to the mRS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>Because the mRS is not a gait-specific measure of disability, the estimated MCID for CGS was only 73.9% sensitive and 57.0% specific for detecting improvement in mRS scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>We estimate that the MCID for gait speed among patients with subacute stroke and severe gait speed impairments is 0.16 m/s. Patients with subacute stroke who increase gait speed &ge;0.16 m/s are more likely to experience a meaningful improvement in disability level than those who do not. Clinicians can use this reference value to develop goals and interpret progress in patients with subacute stroke.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tilson, J. K., Sullivan, K. J., Cen, S. Y., Rose, D. K., Koradia, C. H., Azen, S. P., Duncan, P. W., for the Locomotor Experience Applied Post Stroke (LEAPS) Investigative Team]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Stroke (Neurology), Outcomes Measurement, Stroke (Geriatrics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Meaningful Gait Speed Improvement During the First 60 Days Poststroke: Minimal Clinically Important Difference]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>208</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gait Parameters Associated With Responsiveness to Treadmill Training With Body-Weight Support After Stroke: An Exploratory Study]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Task-specific training programs after stroke improve walking function, but it is not clear which biomechanical parameters of gait are most associated with improved walking speed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to identify gait parameters associated with improved walking speed after a locomotor training program that included body-weight&ndash;supported treadmill training (BWSTT).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>A prospective, between-subjects design was used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>Fifteen people, ranging from approximately 9 months to 5 years after stroke, completed 1 of 3 different 6-week training regimens. These regimens consisted of 12 sessions of BWSTT alternated with 12 sessions of: lower-extremity resistive cycling; lower-extremity progressive, resistive strengthening; or a sham condition of arm ergometry. Gait analysis was conducted before and after the 6-week intervention program. Kinematics, kinetics, and electromyographic (EMG) activity were recorded from the hemiparetic lower extremity while participants walked at a self-selected pace. Changes in gait parameters were compared in participants who showed an increase in self-selected walking speed of greater than 0.08 m/s (high-response group) and in those with less improvement (low-response group).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Compared with participants in the low-response group, those in the high-response group displayed greater increases in terminal stance hip extension angle and hip flexion power (product of net joint moment and angular velocity) after the intervention. The intensity of soleus muscle EMG activity during walking also was significantly higher in participants in the high-response group after the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>Only sagittal-plane parameters were assessed, and the sample size was small.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Task-specific locomotor training alternated with strength training resulted in kinematic, kinetic, and muscle activation adaptations that were strongly associated with improved walking speed. Changes in both hip and ankle biomechanics during late stance were associated with greater increases in gait speed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mulroy, S. J., Klassen, T., Gronley, J. K., Eberly, V. J., Brown, D. A., Sullivan, K. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Adaptive/Assistive Devices, Gait and Locomotion Training, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Hemiplegia/Paraplegia/Quadriplegia, Stroke (Neurology), Stroke (Geriatrics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090141</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gait Parameters Associated With Responsiveness to Treadmill Training With Body-Weight Support After Stroke: An Exploratory Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>223</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/224?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Daily Stepping in Individuals With Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/224?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>In individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI), ambulatory function determined in the clinical setting is related to specific measures of body structure and function and activity limitations, although few studies have quantified the relationship of these variables with daily stepping (steps/day).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The aim of this study was to quantify daily stepping in ambulatory individuals with SCI and its relationship with clinical walking performance measures and specific demographics, impairments, and activity limitations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>A cross-sectional study was performed to estimate relationships among clinical variables to daily stepping in self-identified community versus non&ndash;community (household) walkers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>Average daily stepping was determined in 50 people with chronic, motor incomplete SCI. Data for clinical and self-report measures of walking performance also were collected, and their associations with daily stepping were analyzed using correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Relationships between daily stepping and the measures of demographics, impairments, and activity limitations were identified using correlation and regression analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>The ROC analyses revealed a significant discriminative ability between self-reported community and non&ndash;community walkers using clinical gait measures and daily stepping. Stepping activity generally was low throughout the sample tested, however, with an average of approximately 2,600 steps/day. Knee extension strength (force-generating capacity) and static balance were the primary variables related to daily stepping, with metabolic efficiency and capacity and balance confidence contributing to a lesser extent.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>The small sample size and use of specific impairment-related measures were potential limitations of the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Daily stepping is extremely limited in individuals with incomplete SCI, with a potentially substantial contribution of impairments in knee extension strength and balance.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saraf, P., Rafferty, M. R., Moore, J. L., Kahn, J. H., Hendron, K., Leech, K., Hornby, T. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Hemiplegia/Paraplegia/Quadriplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Daily Stepping in Individuals With Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>235</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>224</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/235?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/235?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bowden, M. G., Behrman, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Hemiplegia/Paraplegia/Quadriplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090064.ic</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Invited Commentary]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>237</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>235</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/237?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/237?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saraf, P., Rafferty, M. R., Moore, J. L., Kahn, J. H., Hendron, K., Leech, K., Hornby, T. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Hemiplegia/Paraplegia/Quadriplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090064.ar</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>239</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/240?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mental Practice for Relearning Locomotor Skills]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/240?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Over the past 2 decades, much work has been carried out on the use of mental practice through motor imagery for optimizing the retraining of motor function in people with physical disabilities. Although much of the clinical work with mental practice has focused on the retraining of upper-extremity tasks, this article reviews the evidence supporting the potential of motor imagery for retraining gait and tasks involving coordinated lower-limb and body movements. First, motor imagery and mental practice are defined, and evidence from physiological and behavioral studies in healthy individuals supporting the capacity to imagine walking activities through motor imagery is examined. Then the effects of stroke, spinal cord injury, lower-limb amputation, and immobilization on motor imagery ability are discussed. Evidence of brain reorganization in healthy individuals following motor imagery training of dancing and of a foot movement sequence is reviewed, and the effects of mental practice on gait and other tasks involving coordinated lower-limb and body movements in people with stroke and in people with Parkinson disease are examined. Lastly, questions pertaining to clinical assessment of motor imagery ability and training strategies are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malouin, F., Richards, C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Amputation, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Motor Control and Motor Learning, Parkinson Disease and Parkinsonian Disorders, Spinal Cord Injuries, Stroke (Neurology), Stroke (Geriatrics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mental Practice for Relearning Locomotor Skills]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>251</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>240</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/252?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cognitive Load and Dual-Task Performance During Locomotion Poststroke: A Feasibility Study Using a Functional Virtual Environment]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/252?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Gait and cognitive functions can deteriorate during dual tasking, especially in people with neurological deficits. Most studies examining the simultaneous effects of dual tasking on motor and cognitive aspects were not performed in ecological environments. Using virtual reality technology, functional environments can be simulated to study dual tasking.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objectives</b></st>
<p>The aims of this study were to test the feasibility of using a virtual functional environment for the examination of dual tasking and to determine the effects of dual tasking on gait parameters in people with stroke and age-matched controls who were healthy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>This was a cross-sectional observational study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>Twelve community-dwelling older adults with stroke and 10 age-matched older adults who were healthy participated in the study. Participants walked on a self-paced treadmill while viewing a virtual grocery aisle projected onto a screen placed in front of them. They were asked to walk through the aisle (single task) or to walk and select ("shop for") items according to instructions delivered before or during walking (dual tasking).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Overall, the stroke group walked slower than the control group in both conditions, whereas both groups walked faster overground than on the treadmill. The stroke group also showed larger variability in gait speed and shorter stride length than the control group. There was a general tendency to increase gait speed and stride length during dual-task conditions; however, a significant effect of dual tasking was found only in one dual-task condition for gait speed and stride duration variability. All participants were able to complete the task with minimal mistakes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>The small size and heterogeneity of the sample were limitations of the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>It is feasible to use a functional virtual environment for investigation of dual tasking. Different gait strategies, including an increase or decrease in gait speed, can be used to cope with the increase in cognitive demands required for dual tasking.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kizony, R., Levin, M. F., Hughey, L., Perez, C., Fung, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Stroke (Neurology), Stroke (Geriatrics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cognitive Load and Dual-Task Performance During Locomotion Poststroke: A Feasibility Study Using a Functional Virtual Environment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>260</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>252</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/261?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rectus Femoris to Gracilis Muscle Transfer With Fractional Lengthening of the Vastus Muscles: A Treatment for Adults With Stiff Knee Gait]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/261?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Stiff knee gait, which may be seen in patients with upper motor neuron injury, describes a gait pattern with a relative loss of sagittal knee motion. It interferes with foot clearance during swing, often leading to inefficient compensatory mechanisms and ambulatory dysfunction. Distal rectus femoris muscle transfers and fractional lengthening of the vastus muscles have been performed in adult patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to describe a unique surgical technique and report on initial outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>A retrospective case-series study design was used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>The patients were adults with stiff knee gait due to stroke or traumatic brain injury who underwent distal rectus femoris muscle transfer with fractional lengthening of the vastus muscles. The patients (19 men and 18 women) had an average age of 51 years at the time of surgery. Lower-extremity examinations, clinical gait analyses, and satisfaction levels were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>At a mean follow-up time of 10 months, 36 (97%) of the 37 patients were satisfied with their clinical and functional results, and the average Viosca score improved from 3.1 to 3.5.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>Limitations of the study include use of a retrospective design, lack of a control group, and limited quantitative measures of gait.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusion</b></st>
<p>Distal rectus femoris muscle transfer and fractional lengthening of the vastus muscles were found to be a possible treatment for adults with stiff-knee gait caused by stroke or traumatic brain injury.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Namdari, S., Pill, S. G., Makani, A., Keenan, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Injuries and Conditions: Knee, Stroke (Neurology), Traumatic Brain Injury, Stroke (Geriatrics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090151</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rectus Femoris to Gracilis Muscle Transfer With Fractional Lengthening of the Vastus Muscles: A Treatment for Adults With Stiff Knee Gait]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>268</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/269?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can Strength Training Predictably Improve Gait Kinematics? A Pilot Study on the Effects of Hip and Knee Extensor Strengthening on Lower-Extremity Alignment in Cerebral Palsy]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/269?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Computer simulations have demonstrated that excessive hip and knee flexion during gait, as frequently seen in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP), can reduce the ability of muscles to provide antigravity support and increase the tendency of hip muscles to internally rotate the thigh. These findings suggest that therapies for improving upright posture during gait also may reduce excessive internal rotation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The goal of this study was to determine whether strength training can diminish the degree of crouched, internally rotated gait in children with spastic diplegic CP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>This was a pilot prospective clinical trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>Eight children with CP participated in an 8-week progressive resistance exercise program, with 3-dimensional gait analysis and isokinetic testing performed before and after the program. Secondary measures included passive range of motion, the Ashworth Scale, and the PedsQL CP Module. To identify factors that may have influenced outcome, individual and subgroup data were examined for patterns of change within and across variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Strength (force-generating capacity) increased significantly in the left hip extensors, with smaller, nonsignificant mean increases in the other 3 extensor muscle groups, yet kinematic and functional outcomes were inconsistent. The first reported subject-specific computer simulations of crouch gait were created for one child who showed substantial benefit to examine the factors that may have contributed to this outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>The sample was small, with wide variability in outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Strength training may improve walking function and alignment in some patients for whom weakness is a major contributor to their gait deficits. However, in other patients, it may produce no change or even undesired outcomes. Given the variability of outcomes in this and other strengthening studies in CP, analytical approaches to determine the sources of variability are needed to better identify those individuals who are most likely to benefit from strengthening.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damiano, D. L., Arnold, A. S., Steele, K. M., Delp, S. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Therapeutic Exercise, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Cerebral Palsy, Cerebral Palsy (Pediatrics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can Strength Training Predictably Improve Gait Kinematics? A Pilot Study on the Effects of Hip and Knee Extensor Strengthening on Lower-Extremity Alignment in Cerebral Palsy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>279</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>269</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/280?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Striding Out With Parkinson Disease: Evidence-Based Physical Therapy for Gait Disorders]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/280?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Although Parkinson disease (PD) is common throughout the world, the evidence for physical therapy interventions that enable long-term improvement in walking is still emerging. This article critiques the major physical therapy approaches related to gait rehabilitation in people with PD: compensatory strategies, motor skill learning, management of secondary sequelae, and education to optimize physical activity and reduce falls. The emphasis of this review is on gait specifically, although balance and falls are of direct importance to gait and are addressed in that context. Although the researchers who have provided the evidence for these approaches grounded their studies on different theoretical paradigms, each approach is argued to have a valid place in the comprehensive management of PD generally and of gait in particular. The optimal mix of interventions for each individual varies according to the stage of disease progression and the patient's preferred form of exercise, capacity for learning, and age.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morris, M. E., Martin, C. L., Schenkman, M. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Therapeutic Exercise, Gait Disorders, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Parkinson Disease and Parkinsonian Disorders, Evidence-Based Practice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Striding Out With Parkinson Disease: Evidence-Based Physical Therapy for Gait Disorders]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>288</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/289?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Similarity of Joint Kinematics and Muscle Demands Between Elliptical Training and Walking: Implications for Practice]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/289?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>People with physical disabilities often face barriers to regaining walking ability and fitness after discharge from rehabilitation. Physical therapists are uniquely positioned to teach clients the knowledge and skills needed to exercise on functionally relevant equipment available in the community, such as elliptical trainers. However, therapeutic use is hindered by a lack of empirical information.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to examine joint kinematics and muscle activation recorded during walking and elliptical training to provide evidence-based data to guide clinical decision making.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>This was a prospective, controlled laboratory study using a repeated-measures design.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>Twenty adults free from impairments that might hinder gait participated. After familiarization procedures, subjects walked and trained on 4 elliptical devices while kinematic, electromyographic (EMG), and stride characteristic data were recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Movement similarities between elliptical training and walking were supported by the documentation of relatively high coefficients of multiple correlation for the hip (.85&ndash;.89), thigh (.92&ndash;.94), knee (.87&ndash;.89) and, to a lesser extent, the ankle (.57&ndash;.71). Significantly greater flexion was documented at the trunk, pelvis, hip, and knee during elliptical training than during walking. One of the elliptical trainers most closely simulated sagittal-plane walking kinematics, as determined from an assessment of key variables. During elliptical training, gluteus maximus and vastus lateralis muscle activation were increased; medial hamstring, gastrocnemius, soleus, and tibialis anterior muscle activation were decreased; and gluteus medius and lateral hamstring muscle activation were relatively unchanged compared with muscle activation of those muscles in walking. On the basis of EMG findings, no elliptical trainer clearly emerged as the best for simulating gait.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>To date, only 4 elliptical trainers have been studied, and the contributions of the upper extremities to movement have not been quantified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Although one of the elliptical trainers best simulated sagittal-plane walking kinematics, EMG analysis failed to identify one clearly superior device. This research provides evidence-based data to help guide clinical decision making related to the use of elliptical trainers across the health care continuum and into the community.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burnfield, J. M., Shu, Y., Buster, T., Taylor, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Gait and Locomotion Training, Therapeutic Exercise, Kinesiology/Biomechanics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Similarity of Joint Kinematics and Muscle Demands Between Elliptical Training and Walking: Implications for Practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>305</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>289</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Jacquelin Perry Special Issue: Stepping Forward With Gait Rehabilitation</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/307?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On "Motor control exercise for chronic low back pain..." Costa LOP, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Phys Ther. 2009;89:1275-1286.]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/307?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weiss, P. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Therapeutic Exercise, Injuries and Conditions: Low Back]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2010.90.2.307.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On "Motor control exercise for chronic low back pain..." Costa LOP, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Phys Ther. 2009;89:1275-1286.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>307</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>307</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/307-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/307-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Costa, L. O.P., Maher, C. G., Latimer, J., Hodges, P. W., Herbert, R. D., Refshauge, K. M., McAuley, J. H., Jennings, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Therapeutic Exercise, Injuries and Conditions: Low Back]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2010.90.2.307.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>308</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>307</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/308?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On "Motor control exercise for chronic low back pain..." Costa LOP, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Phys Ther. 2009;89:1275-1286.]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/308?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hart, D. L., Werneke, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Therapeutic Exercise, Injuries and Conditions: Low Back]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2010.90.2.308</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On "Motor control exercise for chronic low back pain..." Costa LOP, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Phys Ther. 2009;89:1275-1286.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>310</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>308</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/310?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/310?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Costa, L. O.P., Maher, C. G., Latimer, J., Hodges, P. W., Herbert, R. D., Refshauge, K. M., McAuley, J. H., Jennings, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Therapeutic Exercise, Injuries and Conditions: Low Back]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2010.90.2.310</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Author Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>310</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters and Responses</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/312?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[News from the Foundation for Physical Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/90/2/312?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:01:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.2010.90.2.312</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[News from the Foundation for Physical Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>313</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>312</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Scholarships, Fellowships, and Grants</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>