<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org">
<title>PTJ Online Now! Articles</title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org</link>
<description>Physical Therapy - RSS feed of Online Now! Articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1538-6724</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Physical Therapy</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0031-9023</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090167v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090024v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090075v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080365v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080381v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090176v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090023v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080364v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090021v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090012v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090163v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090139v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090041v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080268v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://ptjournal.apta.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Physical Therapy</title>
<url>http://ptjournal.apta.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090167v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Muscle Activation and Perceived Loading During Rehabilitation Exercises: Comparison of Dumbbells and Elastic Resistance]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090167v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>High-intensity resistance training plays an essential role in the prevention and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal injuries and disorders. Although resistance exercises with heavy weights yield high levels of muscle activation, the efficacy of more user-friendly forms of exercise needs to be examined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The aim of this study was to investigate muscle activation and perceived loading during upper-extremity resistance exercises with dumbbells compared with elastic tubing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>A single-group, repeated-measures study design was used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Setting</b></st>
<p>Exercise evaluation was conducted in a laboratory setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Participants</b></st>
<p>Sixteen female workers (aged 26&ndash;55 years) without serious musculoskeletal diseases and with a mean neck and shoulder pain intensity of 7.8 on a 100-mm visual analog scale participated in the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Measurements</b></st>
<p>Electromyographic (EMG) activity was measured in 5 selected muscles during the exercises of lateral raise, wrist extension, and shoulder external rotation during graded loadings with dumbbells (2&ndash;7.5 kg) and elastic tubing (Thera-Band, red to silver resistance). The order of exercises and loadings was randomized for each individual. Electromyographic amplitude was normalized to the absolute maximum EMG amplitude obtained during maximal voluntary isometric contraction and exercise testing. Immediately after each set of exercise, the Borg CR10 scale was used to rate perceived loading during the exercise.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Resistance exercise with dumbbells as well as elastic tubing showed increasing EMG amplitude and perceived loading with increasing resistance. At the individually maximal level of resistance for each exercise&mdash;defined as the 3 repetitions maximum&mdash;normalized EMG activity of the prime muscles was not significantly different between dumbbells (59%&ndash;87%) and elastic tubing (64%&ndash;86%). Perceived loading was moderately to very strongly related to normalized EMG activity (<I>r</I>=.59&ndash;.92).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>The results of this study apply only for exercises performed in a controlled manner (ie, without sudden jerks or high acceleration).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Comparably high levels of muscle activation were obtained during resistance exercises with dumbbells and elastic tubing, indicating that therapists can choose either type in clinical practice. The Borg CR10 can be a useful aid in estimating intensity of individual rehabilitation protocols.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andersen, L. L., Andersen, C. H., Mortensen, O. S., Poulsen, O. M., Bjornlund, I. B. T., Zebis, M. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:10:54 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Therapeutic Exercise, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Injuries and Conditions: Upper Extremity]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090167</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Muscle Activation and Perceived Loading During Rehabilitation Exercises: Comparison of Dumbbells and Elastic Resistance]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090024v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Construct Validity of Muscle Force Tests of the Rotator Cuff Muscles: An Electromyographic Investigation]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090024v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Manual muscle tests (MMTs) are used in clinical settings to evaluate the function and strength (force-generating capacity) of a specific muscle in a position at which the muscle is believed to be most isolated from other synergists and antagonists. Despite frequent use of MMTs, few electromyographic evaluations exist to confirm the ability of MMTs to isolate rotator cuff muscles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>This study examined rotator cuff isolation during 29 shoulder muscle force tests (9 clinical and 20 generic tests).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>An experimental design was used in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Participants and Measurements</b></st>
<p>Electromyographic data were recorded from 4 rotator cuff muscles and 10 additional shoulder muscles of 12 male participants. Maximal isolation ratios (mean specific rotator cuff muscle activation to mean activation of the other 13 recorded muscles) defined which of these tests most isolated the rotator cuff muscles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Three rotator cuff muscles were maximally isolated (obtained highest isolation ratios) within their respective clinical test groups (lateral rotator test group for the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles and abduction test group for the supraspinatus muscle). The subscapularis muscle was maximally isolated equally as effectively within the generic ulnar force and clinical medial rotation groups. Similarly, the supraspinatus and teres minor muscles were isolated equally as effectively in some generic test groups as they were in their respective clinical test groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>Postural artifact in the wire electrodes caused exclusion of some channels from calculations. The grouping of muscle force tests based on test criteria (clinical or generic tests and muscle action) may have influenced which groups most isolated the muscle of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>The results confirmed the appropriateness of 9 commonly used clinical tests for isolating rotator cuff muscles, but suggested that several other muscle force tests were equally appropriate for isolating these muscles.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brookham, R. L., McLean, L., Dickerson, C. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:10:50 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Injuries and Conditions: Shoulder, Tests and Measurements]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Construct Validity of Muscle Force Tests of the Rotator Cuff Muscles: An Electromyographic Investigation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-02-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090075v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interhemispheric Modulation Induced by Cortical Stimulation and Motor Training]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090075v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Interhemispheric inhibition might be a beneficial cortico-cortical interaction, but also might be maladaptive in people with neurological disorders. One recently revisited technique that has been shown to be effective in improving motor function in people with stroke using interhemispheric modulation is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of tDCS combined with unilateral motor training with contralateral hand restraint on interhemispheric inhibition between the dominant and nondominant hemispheres of the brain and on motor performance in participants who were healthy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>This was a double-blind, prospective, single-center study with participants who were healthy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>Twenty participants who were healthy were randomly assigned to receive either active or sham tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) bilaterally combined with unilateral motor training and contralateral hand restraint. A blinded rater assessed motor function and cortical excitability, including assessment of transcallosal inhibition (TCI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>There was a larger increase in motor performance in the nondominant hand for the active tDCS group compared with the sham tDCS group. In addition, a decrease in cortical excitability in the dominant hemisphere and a decrease in TCI from the dominant to nondominant hemisphere were observed for the active tDCS group only. The TCI decrease in the active tDCS group was correlated with motor performance improvement for the nondominant hand.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>Limitations of this study included missing the effect of intracortical inhibition due to a floor effect, not using the optimal tDCS montage, and not being able to assess the effects of other variables such as gender due to the small sample size.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>The results indicate that tDCS enhances the effects of unilateral motor training and contralateral hand restraint on motor function, and this benefit is associated with a different mechanism of action characterized by bihemispheric modulation in which TCI from the dominant to the nondominant hemisphere is decreased. Transcranial direct current stimulation might be a useful tool to enhance the motor effects of constraint-induced movement therapy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, J. A., Pascual-Leone, A., Fregni, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:31:22 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Adaptive/Assistive Devices, Electrotherapy, Therapeutic Exercise, Motor Control and Motor Learning, Neurology/Neuromuscular System: Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090075</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interhemispheric Modulation Induced by Cortical Stimulation and Motor Training]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2010</prism:number>
<prism:volume> </prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage></prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>ptj.20090075v1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080365v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[McConnell Taping Shifts the Patella Inferiorly in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: A Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080365v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Patellar taping is widely used clinically to treat patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Although patellar taping has been demonstrated to reduce patellofemoral pain in patients with PFPS, the kinematic source for this pain reduction has not been identified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to quantify the changes in the 6-degrees-of-freedom patellofemoral kinematics due to taping in patients with PFPS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>A within-subject design and a sample of convenience were used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Participants</b></st>
<p>Fourteen volunteers (19 knees) who were diagnosed with patellofemoral pain that was present for a year or longer were included. Each knee had to meet at least 1 of the following inclusion criteria: Q-angle of &ge;15 degrees, a positive apprehension test, patellar lateral hypermobility (&ge;10 mm), or a positive "J sign."</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>Each knee underwent 2 randomly ordered testing conditions (untaped and taped). A full fast-phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance image set was acquired for each condition while the participants volitionally extended and flexed their knee. Three-dimensional displacements and rotations were calculated through integration of the fast-PC velocity data. Statistical comparisons between baseline patellofemoral kinematics and the change in kinematics due to taping were performed using a 2-tailed paired Student <I>t</I> test. Correlations between baseline patellofemoral kinematics and the change in kinematics due to taping also were quantified.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Patellar taping resulted in a significant patellofemoral inferior shift. The strongest correlation existed between the change in lateral-medial displacement with taping and baseline (<I>r</I>=&ndash;.60).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>The inferior shift in patellar displacement with taping partially explains the previously documented decrease in pain due to increases in contact area. The lack of alteration in 5 of the 6 kinematic variables with taping may have been due to the fact that post-taping kinematic alterations are sensitive to the baseline kinematic values.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derasari, A., Brindle, T. J., Alter, K. E., Sheehan, F. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:31:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Adaptive/Assistive Devices, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Injuries and Conditions: Knee, Pain]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20080365</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[McConnell Taping Shifts the Patella Inferiorly in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: A Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2010</prism:number>
<prism:volume> </prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage></prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>ptj.20080365v1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Technical Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080381v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How to Develop Patient-Centered Research: Some Perspectives Based on Surveys Among People With Rheumatic Diseases in Scandinavia]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080381v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Patient-centered research addresses the research agenda of patients and captures aspects of health and functioning that they consider important. Yet, those who live with a disease or condition have limited influence when it comes to setting the research agenda, and we know little about how they experience being participants in research studies. Furthermore, knowledge is limited concerning factors enhancing or hindering patients' participation in trials and the format that people with rheumatic diseases and their families prefer for dissemination of the results from clinical research. This perspective article describes the research priorities of people with rheumatic diseases in Scandinavia, their experiences and attitudes concerning participation in research projects, and which format for research information they prefer. Based on results from 3 surveys organized by the Scandinavian Rheumatism Associations and on related research literature, the possible implications for future research also are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kjeken, I., Ziegler, C., Skrolsvik, J., Bagge, J., Smedslund, G., Tovik, A., Dagfinrud, H. S., Petersson, I. F., Hagen, K. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:31:15 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Professional Issues, Research: Other, Osteoarthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20080381</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How to Develop Patient-Centered Research: Some Perspectives Based on Surveys Among People With Rheumatic Diseases in Scandinavia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2010</prism:number>
<prism:volume> </prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage></prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>ptj.20080381v1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CARE V Conference Series</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090176v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comprehensive Facial Rehabilitation Improves Function in People With Facial Paralysis: A 5-Year Experience at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090176v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>The Facial Grading Scale (FGS) is a quantitative instrument used to evaluate facial function after facial nerve injury. However, quantitative improvements in function after facial rehabilitation in people with chronic facial paralysis have not been shown.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The objectives of this study were to use the FGS in a large series of consecutive subjects with facial paralysis to quantitatively evaluate improvements in facial function after facial nerve rehabilitation and to describe the management of chronic facial paralysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>The study was a retrospective review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>A total of 303 individuals with facial paralysis were evaluated by 1 physical therapist at a tertiary care facial nerve center during a 5-year period. Facial rehabilitation included education, neuromuscular training, massage, meditation-relaxation, and an individualized home program. After 2 months of home exercises, the participants were re-evaluated, and the home program was tailored as necessary. All participants were evaluated with the FGS before the initiation of facial rehabilitation, and 160 participants were re-evaluated after receiving treatment. All participants underwent the initial evaluation at least 4 months after the onset of facial paralysis; for 49 participants, the evaluation took place more than 3 years after onset.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Statistically significant increases in FGS scores were seen after treatment (<I>P</I>&lt;.001, <I>t</I> test). The average initial score was 56 (SD=21, range=13&ndash;98), and the average score after treatment was 70 (SD=18, range=25&ndash;100).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>A limitation of this study was that evaluations were performed by only 1 therapist.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>For 160 patients with facial paralysis, statistically significant improvements after facial rehabilitation were shown; the improvements appeared to be long lasting with continued treatment. The improvements in the FGS scores indicated that patients can successfully manage symptoms with rehabilitation and underscored the importance of specialized therapy in the management of facial paralysis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lindsay, R. W., Robinson, M., Hadlock, T. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:52:15 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Therapeutic Exercise, Injuries and Conditions: Head and Jaw, Neurology/Neuromuscular System: Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090176</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comprehensive Facial Rehabilitation Improves Function in People With Facial Paralysis: A 5-Year Experience at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2010</prism:number>
<prism:volume> </prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage></prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>ptj.20090176v1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090023v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aerobic Exercise During Early Rehabilitation for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090023v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background and Purpose</b></st>
<p>People with spinal cord injuries (SCIs), particularly those with injuries causing tetraplegia, are at risk for cardiovascular illnesses. There is a compelling need to address poor cardiovascular health as early as possible after cervical SCI. The purpose of this case report is to illustrate the process of aerobic exercise prescription during inpatient rehabilitation for cervical SCI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Case Description</b></st>
<p>The patient was a 22-year-old man who had sustained a complete C5 SCI during a swimming accident 12 weeks before he participated in an aerobic exercise program. The program was developed to facilitate aerobic capacity while minimizing muscular fatigue. The patient attended 18 sessions over a 2-month period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Outcomes</b></st>
<p>The patient's exercise tolerance increased in terms of both exercise duration and exercise intensity. Measurements of cardiovascular health, taken before and after training, revealed substantial increases in peak oxygen uptake (20%) and orthostatic tolerance over the course of the program.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Discussion</b></st>
<p>The patient experienced typical complications associated with acute SCI (eg, orthostatic hypotension, urinary tract infections). He exhibited several signs of improved exercise tolerance and wheelchair mobility during the 2-month program, indicating potential cardiovascular and functional improvements from the exercise training.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tawashy, A. E., Eng, J. J., Krassioukov, A. V., Miller, W. C., Sproule, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:52:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Therapeutic Exercise, Hemiplegia/Paraplegia/Quadriplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Case Reports]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aerobic Exercise During Early Rehabilitation for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2010</prism:number>
<prism:volume> </prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage></prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>ptj.20090023v1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080364v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pediatric Endurance and Limb Strengthening (PEDALS) for Children With Cerebral Palsy Using Stationary Cycling: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080364v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Effective interventions to improve and maintain strength (force-generating capacity) and endurance are needed for children with cerebral palsy (CP).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>This study was performed to examine the effects of a stationary cycling intervention on muscle strength, locomotor endurance, preferred walking speed, and gross motor function in children with spastic diplegic CP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>This was a phase I randomized controlled trial with single blinding.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Setting</b></st>
<p>The interventions were performed in community-based outpatient physical therapy clinics. Outcome assessments were performed in university laboratories.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Participants</b></st>
<p>Sixty-two ambulatory children aged 7 to 18 years with spastic diplegic CP and Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I to III participated in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Intervention and Measurements</b></st>
<p>Participants were randomly assigned to cycling or control (no-intervention) groups. Thirty intervention sessions occurred over 12 weeks. Primary outcomes included peak knee extensor and flexor moments, the 600-Yard Walk-Run Test, the Thirty-Second Walk Test, and the Gross Motor Function Measure sections D and E (GMFM-66).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Significant baseline-postintervention improvements were found for the 600-Yard Walk-Run Test, the GMFM-66, peak knee extensor moments at 120&deg;/s, and peak knee flexor moments at 30&deg;/s for the cycling group. Improved peak knee flexor moments at 120&deg;/s were found for the control group only, although not all participants could complete this speed of testing. Significant differences between the cycling and control groups based on change scores were not found for any outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>Heterogenity of the patient population and intrasubject variability were limitations of the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Significant improvements in locomotor endurance, gross motor function, and some measures of strength were found for the cycling group but not the control group, providing preliminary support for this intervention. As statistical differences were not found in baseline-postintervention change scores between the 2 groups; the results did not demonstrate that stationary cycling was more effective than no intervention. The results of this phase I study provide guidance for future research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fowler, E. G., Knutson, L. M., DeMuth, S. K., Siebert, K. L., Simms, V. D., Sugi, M. H., Souza, R. B., Karim, R., Azen, S. P., for the Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network (PTClinResNet)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:52:05 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Therapeutic Exercise, Cerebral Palsy, Cerebral Palsy (Pediatrics), Randomized Controlled Trials]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20080364</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pediatric Endurance and Limb Strengthening (PEDALS) for Children With Cerebral Palsy Using Stationary Cycling: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2010</prism:number>
<prism:volume> </prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage></prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>ptj.20080364v1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090021v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Treadmill Training and Supramalleolar Orthosis Use on Motor Skill Development in Infants With Down Syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090021v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Children with Down syndrome (DS) often display delayed onset of independent walking. Treadmill training is an effective intervention that leads to an earlier walking onset. In addition, orthoses often are provided to infants with DS to increase stability and promote earlier independent walking. However, this early use of orthoses has not been scientifically verified in infants with DS.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to provide insight into the developmental outcomes of early orthosis use in combination with treadmill training in infants with DS compared with treadmill training alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>This study was a randomized controlled trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Setting</b></st>
<p>This study was conducted in participants' homes and in the motor development laboratory.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Participants and Intervention</b></st>
<p>Seventeen infants with DS entered the study when they could pull themselves to a standing position. They were randomly assigned to either a control group (which received treadmill training) or an experimental group (which received treadmill training and orthoses). During monthly visits to the infants' homes, 3 minutes of treadmill stepping was recorded and each child's motor development skills were tested. The treadmill training ended once the child took 3 independent steps. One month following walking onset, developmental tests were readministered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Measurements</b></st>
<p>The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) was used to test motor skill development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>The average (SD) time in the study was 268 (88) days for the control group and 206 (109) days for the experimental group. All infants showed significantly increased GMFM scores over time. At 1 month of walking experience, the control group had higher GMFM scores than the experimental group, with higher standing and walking, running, and jumping subscale scores.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>Limitations of this study included a small sample of convenience, a statistical model that may have reduced validity at the tail end, and a lack of blinding in the GMFM scorer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Orthoses may have a detrimental effect on overall gross motor skill development.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Looper, J., Ulrich, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:01:34 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Adaptive/Assistive Devices, Gait and Locomotion Training, Therapeutic Exercise, Motor Control and Motor Learning, Down Syndrome]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090021</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Treadmill Training and Supramalleolar Orthosis Use on Motor Skill Development in Infants With Down Syndrome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090012v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increasing Muscle Extensibility: A Matter of Increasing Length or Modifying Sensation?]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090012v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Various theories have been proposed to explain increases in muscle extensibility observed after intermittent stretching. Most of these theories advocate a mechanical increase in length of the stretched muscle. More recently, a sensory theory has been proposed suggesting instead that increases in muscle extensibility are due to a modification of sensation only. Studies that evaluated biomechanical properties of muscles immediately after stretching and after short-term (3- to 8-week) stretching programs support this sensory theory of increasing muscle extensibility. The biomechanical effects of long-term (&gt;8 weeks) and chronic stretching programs have not yet been evaluated. The purposes of this article are to review each of these proposed theories and to discuss the implications for research and clinical practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weppler, C. H., Magnusson, S. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:01:29 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Therapeutic Exercise, Anatomy and Physiology: Musculoskeletal System, Kinesiology/Biomechanics, Anatomy: Central Nervous System and Neuromuscular System, Perspectives]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increasing Muscle Extensibility: A Matter of Increasing Length or Modifying Sensation?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Perspectives</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090163v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Balance Impairment as a Risk Factor for Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Who Are High Functioning: A Prospective Study]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090163v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Screening should have simple and easy-to-administer methods that identify impairments associated with future fall risk, but there is a lack of literature supporting validation for their use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the independent contribution of balance assessment on future fall risk, using 5 methods to quantify balance impairment, on the outcomes "any fall" and "any injurious fall" in community-dwelling older adults who are higher functioning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>This was a prospective cohort study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Methods</b></st>
<p>A sample of 210 community-dwelling older adults (70% male, 30% female; mean age=79.9 years, SD=4.7) received a comprehensive geriatric assessment at baseline, which included the Berg Balance Scale to measure balance. Information on daily falls was collected for 12 months by each participant's monthly submission of a falls log calendar.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>Seventy-eight people (43%) fell, of whom 54 (30%) sustained an injurious fall and 32 (18%) had recurrent falls (&ge;2 falls). Different balance measurement methods identified different numbers of people as impaired. Adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates for an increased risk of any fall were 1.58 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.06, 2.35) for self-report of balance problems, 1.58 (95% CI=1.03, 2.41) for one-leg stance, and 1.46 (95% CI=1.02, 2.09) for limits of stability. An adjusted RR estimate for an increased risk of an injurious fall of 1.95 (95% CI=1.15, 3.31) was found for self-report of balance problems.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>The study was a secondary analysis of data.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Not all methods of evaluating balance impairment are associated with falls. The number of people identified as having balance impairment varies with the measurement tool; therefore, the measurement tools are not interchangeable or equivalent in defining an at-risk population. The thresholds established in this study indicate individuals who should receive further comprehensive fall assessment and treatment to prevent falls.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muir, S. W., Berg, K., Chesworth, B., Klar, N., Speechley, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:31:27 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Balance, Patient/Client History, Tests and Measurements, Falls and Falls Prevention]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090163</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Balance Impairment as a Risk Factor for Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Who Are High Functioning: A Prospective Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090139v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Exercise and Education Program Improves Well-Being of New Mothers: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090139v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a physical therapy exercise and health care education program on the psychological well-being of new mothers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design</b></st>
<p>This was a randomized controlled trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Participants</b></st>
<p>Primiparous and multiparous English-speaking women ready for discharge from The Angliss Hospital postnatal ward were eligible for this study. Women who were receiving psychiatric care were excluded. One hundred sixty-one women were randomized into the trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Intervention</b></st>
<p>The experimental group (n=62) received an 8-week "Mother and Baby" (M&amp;B) program, including specialized exercise provided by a women's health physical therapist combined with parenting education. The other group (education only [EO], n=73) received only the same educational material as the experimental group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Main Outcome Measures</b></st>
<p>Psychological well-being (Positive Affect Balance Scale), depressive symptoms (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), and physical activity levels were assessed at baseline, after 8 weeks (post-program), and then 4 weeks later.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>There was significant improvement in well-being scores and depressive symptoms of the M&amp;B group compared with the EO group over the study period. More specifically, there was a significant positive effect on well-being scores and depressive symptoms at 8 weeks, and this effect was maintained 4 weeks after completion of the program. The number of women identified as "at risk" for postnatal depression pre-intervention was reduced by 50% by the end of the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>Although this study provides promising short-term (4-week) outcomes, further work is needed to explore whether the intervention effects are maintained as sustained psychological and behavioral benefits at 6 months.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>A physical therapy exercise and health education program is effective in improving postnatal well-being. Routine use of this program may reduce longer-term problems such as postnatal depression.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norman, E., Sherburn, M., Osborne, R. H., Galea, M. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:31:23 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient/Client-Related Instruction, Therapeutic Exercise, Psychosocial: Other, Pregnancy, Randomized Controlled Trials]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090139</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Exercise and Education Program Improves Well-Being of New Mothers: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090041v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Progressive Resistance Training Improves Overall Physical Activity Levels in Patients With Early Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20090041v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background</b></st>
<p>Prescription of resistance training (RT) exercises is an essential aspect of management for knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, whether patients with knee OA who are randomly assigned to receive RT simply substitute RT for other modes of physical activity remains unclear.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Objective</b></st>
<p>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a structured RT intervention on overall levels of moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) in patients with early-onset knee OA. The study compared patients with early-onset OA who participated in an RT program, those who participated in a self-management (SM) program, and those who participated in both RT and SM. Because participants randomly assigned to receive the RT intervention may simply switch activity modes, resulting in little net effect, we assessed total MVPA in addition to tracking changes in strength (force-generating capacity).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Design and Intervention</b></st>
<p>This study was a randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of SM alone, RT alone, and combined RT+SM on MVPA in patients with early OA of the knee.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Setting</b></st>
<p>The study was conducted on a university campus, with patient recruitment from the local community.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Participants</b></st>
<p>The participants in this study were 171 patients (74% women, 26% men) with knee OA. They had a mean age of 55.1 (SD=7.1) years, a mean body mass index of 27.6 (SD=4.2) kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and radiographic status of grade II OA (and no higher) in at least one knee, as defined by the Kellgren and Lawrence classification. They wore an accelerometer while awake (X=14.2 [SD=2.2] hours) for 5 to 7 contiguous days (X=6.8 [SD=0.5] days) at baseline and at 3 and 9 months of intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Results</b></st>
<p>The participants engaged in MVPA a mean of 26.2 (SD=19.3) minutes per day at baseline. Both groups significantly increased their MVPA from baseline to 3 months (RT group by 18% [effect size (d)=0.26]; SM group by 22% [effect size (d)=0.25]), but only the RT group sustained those changes at 9 months (RT group maintained a 10% increase [effect size (d)=0.15]; SM group maintained a 2% increase [effect size (d)=0.03]). A significant group <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> time interaction for MVPA indicated that the RT group maintained higher MVPA levels than the SM group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Limitations</b></st>
<p>Lack of direct measures of energy expenditure and physical function was a limitation of the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Conclusions</b></st>
<p>Patients with early-onset OA of the knee can engage in an RT program without sacrificing their overall MVPA levels. These results support the value of RT for management of knee OA.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farr, J. N., Going, S. B., McKnight, P. E., Kasle, S., Cussler, E. C., Cornett, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:31:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Self-Care and Home Management, Therapeutic Exercise, Injuries and Conditions: Knee, Osteoarthritis, Randomized Controlled Trials, Osteoarthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Progressive Resistance Training Improves Overall Physical Activity Levels in Patients With Early Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080268v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Physical Therapy in the Emergency Department: Development of a Novel Practice Venue]]></title>
<link>http://ptjournal.apta.org/cgi/content/short/ptj.20080268v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><b>Background and Purpose</b></st>
<p>The American Physical Therapy Association's Vision 2020 advocates that physical therapists be integral members of health care teams responsible for diagnosing and managing movement and functional disorders. This report details the design and early implementation of a physical therapist service in the emergency department (ED) of a large, urban hospital and presents recommendations for assessing the effectiveness of physical therapists in this setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Case Description</b></st>
<p>Emergency departments serve multiple purposes in the American health care system, including care of patients with non&ndash;life-threatening illnesses. Physical therapists have expertise in screening for problems that are not amenable to physical therapy and in addressing a wide range of acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain problems. This expertise invites inclusion into the culture of ED practice. This administrative case report describes planning and early implementation of a physical therapist practice in an ED, shares preliminary outcomes, and provides suggestions for expansion and effectiveness testing of practice in this novel venue.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Outcomes</b></st>
<p>Referrals have increased and length of stay has decreased for patients receiving physical therapy. Preliminary surveys suggest high patient and practitioner satisfaction with physical therapy services. Outpatient physical therapy follow-up options were developed. Educating ED personnel to triage patients who show deficits in pain and functional mobility to physical therapy has challenged the usual culture of ED processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><b>Discussion</b></st>
<p>Practice in the hospital ED enables physical therapists to fully use their knowledge, diagnostic skills, and ability to manage acute pain and musculoskeletal injury. Recommendations for future action are made to encourage more institutions across the country to incorporate physical therapy in EDs to enhance the process and outcome of nonemergent care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fleming-McDonnell, D., Czuppon, S., Deusinger, S. S., Deusinger, R. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:31:19 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical Decision Making, Case Reports, Health Care System, Health Policy & Administration: Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20080268</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Physical Therapy in the Emergency Department: Development of a Novel Practice Venue]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Physical Therapy Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>