Exercise, along with dietary intervention, represents first-line therapy for diabetes mellitus. Aerobic exercise is recommended for its beneficial effects on glucose control as well as its abilities to retard the progression of other comorbidities common in patients with diabetes, such as cardiovascular disease. The capability of aerobic exercise to improve glycemic control in diabetes is well documented, although adherence to exercise regimens is problematic. More recently, the glucose-lowering effects of resistance training have also been documented; this form of exercise has additional benefits, such as the capability to counteract sarcopenia, which is common in older people with type 2 diabetes. Exercise in people with diabetes, however, also can present significant challenges to glycemic control. Excessive glucose lowering can occur under certain conditions, enhancing the threat of hypoglycemia; in other situations, hyperglycemia can be accentuated. An understanding of the interactions between specific antidiabetic medications and various forms and intensities of exercise is essential to optimizing glycemic control while minimizing the potential for acute derangements in plasma glucose levels. Exogenous forms of insulin and agents that stimulate insulin secretion in a glucose-independent manner (such as sulfonylureas and glinides) increase the propensity for hypoglycemia during low- to moderate-intensity aerobic exercise. In contrast, exercise protocols characterized by high intensity are more likely to result in episodes of hyperglycemia. Strategies to minimize inappropriate swings in glycemic control are reviewed.
Exercise and diet are cornerstones of therapy in diabetes mellitus. In most patients with diabetes, the addition of pharmacologic therapy is required for the management of plasma glucose levels. In type 1 diabetes, the etiology of which involves the autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells, exogenous insulin (ie, from a source other than the patient's own β-cells) is absolutely required. Therapy consists of the administration of various insulin preparations designed to meet basal and meal-associated insulin requirements.1,2 In recent years, several new insulin analogs with unique properties have been developed; these include short-acting insulin analogs that can be taken just before meals. These insulin analogs differ in their pharmacokinetic properties, such as their rate of appearance in the bloodstream and how long they remain in the plasma (Tab. 1).
Type 2 diabetes is characterized by resistance to the actions of insulin in the presence of defects in insulin secretion. Absolute insulin levels vary with the severity of the disease; early stages tend to be characterized by a compensatory hyperinsulinemic state, but progressive β-cell failure eventually occurs in most patients, leading to low absolute levels of circulating insulin. Several oral and non-insulin-based injectable therapies that act on different organ systems have been developed in an effort to modulate glucose homeostasis (Tab. 2). These therapies include agents that regulate endogenous insulin secretion (ie, drugs that stimulate the patient's own β-cells to secrete more insulin), dampen hepatic glucose production, enhance peripheral glucose metabolism, slow the gastrointestinal processing of food and ultimately the absorption of glucose, reduce secretion of the counterregulatory hormone glucagon, or combinations of these. A review of these therapies is beyond the scope of this article, given that the primary concerns during exercise in people with diabetes are related to the use of exogenous insulin and insulin secretagogues. Many people with type 2 diabetes use insulin secretagogues, and most eventually progress to a requirement for exogenous insulin therapy.3 Detailed reviews of available antidiabetic medicines are available elsewhere.4,5
To understand the challenge of blood glucose regulation in diabetes, one must consider the various organs that collaborate in the regulation of blood glucose levels in health and disease. A full review is beyond the scope of this article, but for the purposes of this review, key organ systems to consider are skeletal muscle, liver, and the endocrine pancreas.6 Skeletal muscle represents, quantitatively, the primary site of insulin-mediated glucose disposal. The liver is the primary organ that both stores glucose after food ingestion and dispenses glucose to the circulation between meals in order to maintain appropriate plasma glucose levels. Fasting plasma glucose levels (ie, sampled 8 hours or more after the last meal) are ∼80 to 100 mg/dL (∼4.5mM–5.5mM) in young adults who are healthy. Insulin is released from pancreatic β-cells in response to the ingestion of food and, in turn, stimulates glucose uptake and storage in muscle and adipose tissue while simultaneously suppressing hepatic glucose production (Fig. 1). These actions prevent large increases in plasma glucose levels after a meal in people who are healthy, because they result in the efficient processing of glucose. In contrast, diabetes mellitus is characterized by exaggerated plasma glucose levels after a meal and, as the disease progresses, by increases in plasma glucose levels in the fasting state. Diabetes mellitus is diagnosed in 1 of 3 ways7:
Fasting plasma glucose level at or above 126 mg/dL (7.0mM)
Random plasma glucose level (irrespective of time elapsed since the last meal) at or above 200 mg/dL (11.1mM) combined with symptoms of diabetes, such as frequent urination, excessive thirst, rapid weight loss, or any combination of these symptoms
Plasma glucose level at or above 200 mg/dL (11.1mM) when measured 2 hours after an oral load of 75 g of glucose
The development of multiple therapeutic approaches to the treatment of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes has enhanced the capacity to maintain blood glucose levels closer to treatment goals. Tight control of blood glucose levels significantly reduces the incidence of diabetic complications,8–10 as reviewed elsewhere in this series. However, the availability of various therapeutic choices also imposes on the patient and health care provider the need to better understand how these therapies act in order to anticipate potential undesirable consequences of exercise sessions. Studies of tight glycemic control in sedentary people with diabetes have illustrated the undesirable effect that occurs as plasma glucose levels are regulated closer to goal levels—that is, an increasing propensity for hypoglycemia.4,7 Neurons rely on glucose as their primary energy source. When plasma glucose levels fall below the lower limit of fasting values (ie, below ∼70 mg/dL [∼4mM]), central nervous system function is impaired. Symptoms, which include irritability, confusion, dizziness, slurred speech, lethargy, and blurred vision, become progressively more severe as blood glucose levels continue to decrease. If blood glucose levels become very low, seizures and coma can occur. Other symptoms of hypoglycemia are secondary to defense systems that attempt to counteract the decline in blood glucose through activation of the sympathetic nervous system. These symptoms include tremor, sweating, hunger, and increased heart rate.
Exercise in people with diabetes also presents challenges to glycemic control. One of the beneficial effects of exercise on glucose homeostasis is a marked stimulation of blood glucose utilization during and after exercise, as reviewed elsewhere in this series. However, the net effect of exercise on blood glucose levels in diabetes depends on several factors, such as starting levels of glycemia, type and duration of exercise, and type and timing of antidiabetic medications. Insulin plays a critical role in regulating hepatic glucose output during many (but not all) forms of exercise and can also modulate peripheral glucose uptake during exercise and recovery. Medications that control plasma insulin levels present the greatest challenge to the management of plasma glucose levels when patients with diabetes exercise, as outlined below.
Insulin levels are altered by certain forms of exercise. In people with diabetes, a failure to adequately adjust medications or carbohydrate supplementation can result in inappropriate swings in blood glucose levels, either too low or too high, depending on the factors involved. Acutely, the most serious danger to the health of a person with diabetes is hypoglycemia, for the reasons noted above. However, circumstances that result in inappropriate elevations in blood glucose levels (such as excessive carbohydrate supplementation or too large a reduction in insulin dosage) also have adverse implications. Knowledge of the factors that affect glucose metabolism is critical for designing strategies to minimize inappropriate swings in glycemia. Coupled with frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose levels, this knowledge can lessen the likelihood that exercise will have deleterious effects on glycemic control.
Effects of Regular Aerobic Exercise on Glycemic Control
A full review of studies demonstrating the power of aerobic exercise in the management of diabetes is not provided here; more information can be obtained from other reviews.11–13 In brief, resting skeletal muscle prefers free fatty acids as an energy source, particularly in the postabsorptive state (ie, periods between meals, after the most recent meal has been processed). Exercise induces a shift to a mixture of free fatty acids, glycogen stores, and circulating glucose; the balance among these 3 sources varies with the duration and intensity of physical activity.13,14
Circulating glucose is routed into working skeletal muscle through several complementary mechanisms.13,15 Contraction of skeletal muscle stimulates glucose transport and metabolism into working muscle through an insulin-independent pathway. Exercise has additional effects that enhance the ability of insulin to activate glucose transport into muscles that have exercised; this effect can persist for many hours after physical activity has ceased. The delivery of glucose to working muscle is facilitated by increased blood flow to exercising muscles. When aerobic exercise is repeated on a regular basis (ie, training), muscles recruited by the training stimulus undergo additional adaptations that involve the synthesis of key components needed for glucose uptake and metabolism (eg, the GLUT4 glucose transporter and enzymes, such as hexokinase, that control the uptake and metabolism of glucose in muscle).
These responses to exercise facilitate the clearance of glucose from the circulation and the metabolism of glucose in exercised skeletal muscle (oxidation during exercise; resynthesis of glycogen stores after exercise has been completed). In people with diabetes, plasma glucose levels decrease during and shortly after a bout of exercise. Indexes of long-term glycemic control, such as glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c, the level of which is elevated in diabetes), are improved (ie, lowered) when exercise is performed regularly.11–13
Continuous Low- to Moderate-Intensity Exercise
Glucoregulation During Exercise in People Without Diabetes
When people who do not have diabetes exercise at low to moderate workloads, plasma glucose levels are maintained at or near preexercise levels.14 Euglycemia (ie, a normal glucose level) is maintained by close correlation of peripheral glucose uptake and hepatic glucose output across a range of exercise intensities up to approximately 80% of maximal oxygen uptake (V̇o2max). As workloads are increased over this range, muscle glucose uptake increases and the production of glucose by the liver is enhanced to a similar extent16 (Fig. 2). Moderate workloads increase glucose utilization by about 3 mg/kg of body weight per minute; if this process were not counterbalanced by an increased hepatic supply of glucose, then overt hypoglycemia would occur within about 30 minutes11 (a theoretical illustration is shown in Fig. 3). Glucose is generated by the liver through 2 processes: (1) mobilization from hepatic glycogen stores as a result of glycogenolysis (which predominates earlier during exercise) and (2) synthesis of new glucose from smaller precursor molecules through gluconeogenesis (which assumes greater importance as exercise duration increases). Hypoglycemia rarely occurs in people who do not have diabetes unless exercise is quite prolonged—that is, when liver glycogen stores become depleted and the exercise workload exceeds the ability of gluconeogenesis to meet peripheral demands.
Figures 4 and 5 illustrate changes in key hormones and indexes of glucose metabolism during low- to moderate-intensity exercise (50% of V̇o2max, performed for 40 minutes; open symbols) and during high-intensity exercise (87% of V̇o2max, sustained for ∼15 minutes; closed symbols) (the response to high-intensity exercise is discussed below). The increase in hepatic glucose output observed during low- to moderate-intensity exercise is controlled primarily by changes in insulin and glucagon secretion. This is a key point in understanding the challenges of exercise in diabetes, as discussed below. Exercise at these intensity levels results in decreased insulin secretion (likely mediated mostly by the increase in adrenergic tone to the pancreas) and increased glucagon secretion.17 The decrease in insulin secretion is thought to be important for the activation of hepatic glycogenolysis, and the increase in glucagon secretion enhances both glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis. In addition, exercise increases the generation and delivery to the liver of gluconeogenic precursors. The interaction between these 2 pancreatic hormones is responsible for (nearly) the entire increase in the liver glucose supply. For example, the ability of glucagon to enhance glucose output is significantly magnified when insulin levels are allowed to decline in their usual fashion during exercise, compared with experimental circumstances in which insulin is maintained at baseline (preexercise) levels.17
In exercise of relatively short duration, increases in arterial plasma glucagon levels are quantitatively modest. It is not the arterial concentrations of insulin and glucagon that control liver glucose output, but rather the concentrations of these pancreatic hormones in the hepatic portal vein, into which they are secreted.17 The concentrations of these 2 hormones are higher in the portal vein than in the overall systemic circulation. Animal studies (in which portal vein blood can be much more readily sampled) have revealed that alterations in the portal concentrations of these 2 hormones—in the range occurring physiologically—are the critical determinants controlling hepatic glucose supply during low- to moderate-intensity exercise.18,19 If the portal vein levels of insulin and glucagon are deliberately fixed at preexercise levels, then moderate-intensity exercise can lead to significant decreases in plasma glucose levels.20 Mechanistically, this result derives, in large measure, from direct effects of portal vein insulin and glucagon concentrations on the liver. If the usual exercise-triggered decrease in portal vein insulin concentrations is artificially overridden and portal vein insulin concentrations are instead increased within the physiological range (Fig. 6), then the exercise-induced stimulation of liver glucose production is instead rapidly and substantially suppressed.21 In contrast, hyperinsulinemia in the arterial circulation without a corresponding increase in the portal vein causes only a modest and delayed reduction in hepatic glucose output (most likely the result of a secondary effect of insulin [lowering free fatty acid levels]).
Effects of Low- to Moderate-Intensity Exercise on Glucoregulation in People With Diabetes
In patients who have type 2 diabetes and are taking medications that do not act by elevating (endogenous or exogenous) insulin levels, the effect of low- to moderate-intensity exercise varies with the starting levels of glycemia. During exercise, patients with slightly or moderately elevated glucose levels generally experience a decline in plasma glucose levels that does not result in hypoglycemia.13 The decline in blood glucose levels under these conditions occurs because peripheral glucose uptake increases more than hepatic glucose output.22 If exercise is superimposed shortly after a meal has been ingested, then the usual meal-induced increase in glycemia is blunted.23 For patients still possessing reasonable pancreatic function, exercise results in a decline in blood glucose levels concomitantly with a decline in plasma insulin levels.23
Because muscle contractile activity stimulates glucose transport activity partly through an insulin-independent mechanism,24–27 exercise is useful in lowering plasma glucose levels in patients lacking insulin secretary capacity, displaying insulin resistance, or both, if conditions are appropriately controlled. If people with diabetes are ketotic and severely hyperglycemic as a result of significant insulin underdosing, then exercise aggravates the existing hyperglycemia. In contrast, if people with either type 114 or type 228,29 diabetes are adequately treated with insulin and display mild to moderate hyperglycemia, then a session of vigorous exercise can lower blood glucose levels.
The potential beneficial effects of exercise on glucose levels are counterbalanced by potential risks to people with insulin-dependent diabetes. In the early 20th century, it was recognized that exercise performed by people with insulin-deficient diabetes under certain conditions could result in significant hypoglycemia.30 Patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes requiring exogenous insulin therapy, insulin secretagogue therapy, or both face unique challenges during exercise. Insulin levels in these patients are derived exclusively or predominantly from their medications; as a result, they do not decrease in response to exercise. Patients whose insulin levels significantly exceed the fasting baseline level at the time of exercise tend to be overtreated with insulin relative to this physiological challenge (ie, they operate at inappropriately high points on their hepatic and muscle insulin dose-response curves). Without the normal exercise-induced decline in portal vein insulin levels, hepatic glucose production remains suppressed and cannot increase sufficiently to match the increase in peripheral glucose utilization. As a result, blood glucose levels decline, potentially to hypoglycemic levels. Under these conditions, hypoglycemia can develop despite adequate hepatic glycogen reservoirs. The situation can be further exacerbated if peripheral insulin levels are inappropriately elevated; higher systemic levels of insulin also stimulate greater glucose uptake into peripheral tissues, including muscle beds not activated by exercise.
The importance of prevailing insulin levels at the time of exercise in people who have diabetes and are taking insulin or insulin secretagogues is now well recognized. A few selected examples of data underlying the current understanding are discussed.
In a study of adults with diabetes, an artificial endocrine pancreas (AEP) capable of adjusting the insulin infusion in relation to blood glucose levels after a meal was used.31 Subjects without and subjects with diabetes were given breakfast; 45 minutes later, they performed a 45-minute session of moderate-intensity exercise. Circulating glucose and insulin levels in subjects with diabetes and using the AEP mirrored those in subjects without diabetes, increasing in response to the meal and returning to the baseline (premeal) levels during exercise. In another group of subjects, the AEP was instead programmed to deliver sufficient insulin to respond to the meal challenge but at a constant rate throughout the study; that is, the insulin levels were not allowed to decline during the exercise challenge. In the latter subjects, the exercise bout resulted in a steady decline in glucose levels to below the premeal level, such that the subjects experienced symptomatic hypoglycemia.
Studies in children with type 1 diabetes confirmed the risk of exercise under conditions in which exogenous insulin levels are not adjusted. For example, in subjects treated with a subcutaneous insulin infusion designed to bring preexercise glucose levels into the normal range, a 45-minute moderate-intensity exercise session during which the insulin infusion rate was kept constant resulted in a substantial further decrease in blood glucose levels, leading to hypoglycemia, in a significant proportion of subjects.32
In another study, the effect of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (treadmill walking in 15-minute segments totaling 60 minutes of activity) designed to mimic after-school activity, performed in the afternoon 4 hours after a lunch meal, was evaluated.33 Children and adolescents treated with either an insulin pump or a combination of basal and short-acting insulin analogs were studied on both a rest day and an exercise day. Insulin regimens were deliberately kept the same on the 2 study days. On the exercise day, 83% of the subjects experienced a decline in plasma glucose levels of at least 25% from the baseline (average drop of 40% across all subjects). Hypoglycemia was common (30% of the subjects had plasma glucose levels of <60 mg/dL or required glucose administration during or after exercise) and relatively rapid in onset (33% of episodes occurred within 30 minutes on the exercise day). The lower the baseline glucose levels were, the greater the proportion of children who experienced hypoglycemia.
In contrast to the critical role of portal vein hormones in controlling liver glucose output, it is the peripheral concentration of insulin that stimulates glucose uptake into muscle and adipose tissue after meals and into previously activated muscle fibers when insulin sensitivity has been enhanced by exercise. Thus, the type of insulin replacement and its relative effect on portal versus systemic insulin levels affect glycemic control after exercise.
Several factors can contribute to dysregulated glucose control during and for several hours after exercise in insulin-treated patients, as outlined by Camacho et al17:
The lack of a decline in insulin secretion during exercise inappropriately accentuates the effects of insulin on the liver and peripheral tissues
Exercise can accelerate the absorption of insulin injected at a subcutaneous site located near the muscles used during exercise
The exercise-mediated enhancement of the action of insulin magnifies the consequences of inappropriately elevated insulin levels during exercise as well as in the postexercise period, when insulin sensitivity can remain enhanced for many hours; the net effect depends partly on the pharmacokinetics of the particular insulin preparation or insulin secretagogue used
In addition to the threat posed by excessively high insulin levels during exercise, it is now recognized that when people experience episodes of hypoglycemia before a bout of exercise, their ability to subsequently mount counterregulatory responses to impending hypoglycemia during exercise is blunted, rendering them more susceptible to exercise-induced hypoglycemia.34,35 Conversely, prolonged endurance exercise sessions can impair the counterregulatory responses to subsequent hypoglycemic challenges.34,35 The latter phenomenon, combined with the induction by exercise of a prolonged enhancement in insulin sensitivity, may be an important contributor to the hypoglycemia seen during the evening after an afternoon exercise session in people with insulin-dependent diabetes.36
Minimizing Hypoglycemic Events During Low- to Moderate-Intensity Exercise in Patients Taking Insulin
For patients who have type 1 diabetes as well as those who have type 2 diabetes and require exogenous insulin, there is no single recommendation specifying adjustments for exercise. The glycemic response to physical activity and the propensity for hypoglycemia during or after an exercise session are influenced by several factors37–40:
Type of insulin (or insulin combinations) and corresponding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties
Time elapsed since last insulin dose
Form of administration (injection, inhalation, or insulin pump)
Injection site and proximity to exercising limbs
Type, duration, and intensity of exercise
Amount of muscle mass involved in the activity
Level of physical fitness
Preexercise glucose levels
Patency of counterregulatory responses
With carbohydrate supplementation: type of carbohydrate (simple or complex), rate of absorption, and timing of administration
Because of the complexity of factors that can influence glucose utilization, guidelines must be relatively general in nature. Appendix 1 lists factors to consider in initiating an exercise program. Discussed below are some key points.
As a first step in the initiation of an exercise regimen or sporting activity, patients should be assessed for conditions that might contraindicate certain types of exercise or that could increase the risk of specific types of injury.7,13,37 These conditions include cardiovascular risk factors (because diabetes can enhance the propensity for cardiovascular disease in the presence of known risk factors), autonomic and peripheral neuropathies, and retinopathy. The presence of risk factors or diabetic complications should not preclude the use of an exercise program. When such conditions are present, exercise plans can still be prescribed but should be tailored to lessen the specific risks involved. For example, people at high risk of cardiovascular disease should be encouraged to begin with short periods of low-intensity exercise and then gradually increase the duration and intensity of their exercise sessions. Patients with autonomic neuropathy should perform only light exercise until a more thorough cardiac evaluation has been performed. For additional information on exercise in these pathologies, see the article by Cade41 in this issue. Patients with peripheral neuropathy are at higher risk of problems when performing weight-bearing activities, but non–weight-bearing activities, such as cycling, swimming, or upper-body exercise, can be prescribed. For additional information on exercise for people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy, see the article by LeMaster et al42 in this issue. Even patients with significant renal impairment requiring dialysis can be encouraged to use modalities appropriate for specific aspects of their disease.37
Once an exercise program has been chosen, patients can prepare for their exercise sessions. Glucose levels should be checked shortly before patients begin exercise sessions. To minimize the risk of uncontrolled hyperglycemia, if blood glucose levels are greater than 250 mg/dL and urinary ketone body levels are moderate or high (indicating that insulin levels are very low), then the exercise session should be postponed until appropriate therapeutic measures have minimized ketone production and reduced glucose levels.7,39 Even if ketone levels are not high, when blood glucose levels exceed 300 mg/dL, patients should consider postponing exercise until blood sugar levels are brought under better control. Likewise, patients should not exercise when blood glucose levels are too low. Supplemental carbohydrates should be administered if preexercise glucose concentrations are less than 100 mg/dL.7
When patients are adjusting to a new exercise program, blood glucose levels should be checked shortly before, during (if practical), and immediately after the exercise session. Because exercise can result in a long-lasting enhancement of insulin action, additional checks should be made several hours after the exercise has been completed. Measurements should be repeated with each exercise session until the typical glycemic response to a given activity is understood. Even after a regular routine has been established, periodic checks should be performed because changes in factors such as diet, medication, and body weight can influence blood glucose levels. Significant alterations to the usual exercise pattern (such as type of sport, duration, and intensity) also necessitate additional checks of the blood glucose profile.
If the exercise results in overt hypoglycemia or a tendency for hypoglycemia, then the insulin dose should be adjusted, carbohydrate supplementation should be given, or both. For exercise planned in advance, several options are available:
The dose of insulin can be reduced beforehand
Injections can be made distant from the exercising limbs
Carbohydrates can be ingested before exercise, during exercise, or both
All of these strategies can be combined; it should be recognized that these strategies are dependent on each other; for example, insulin dose reductions should be smaller if undertaken concomitantly with carbohydrate supplementation. For exercise not planned in advance (which is particularly common in children), carbohydrate supplementation is the only practical option unless patients use an insulin pump; in the latter situation, the rate of insulin infusion can be decreased or the pump can be turned off entirely.43
It is beyond the scope of this discussion to review all of the studies that have evaluated issues such as various exercise protocols, insulin regimens, timing of exercise onset relative to medications, and carbohydrate supplementation. A few examples are presented to help readers understand the issues.
In a common diabetes treatment regimen, a long-acting insulin is administered to meet basal insulin requirements over a prolonged time period, accompanied by meal-associated administration of a short-acting insulin. If the patient has already administered a normal dose of a fast-acting insulin analog, then it is preferable to avoid exercise for several hours. In one study, the effects of regular insulin and the short-acting analog insulin lispro, taken at their standard premeal intervals in adults with type 1 diabetes, were compared.44 When exercise was initiated 40 minutes after breakfast, insulin lispro lowered glucose levels 2.2-fold more than regular insulin; that is, the fast-acting analog showed more-pronounced glucose lowering at a time associated with its peak levels in plasma. In contrast, when exercise was performed 3 hours after breakfast (a time at which the levels of the analog in plasma are known to be substantially lower than peak levels), insulin lispro lowered glucose levels only half as much as regular insulin.
An alternative approach is to reduce the dose of short-acting insulin if exercise is to be performed during a time period when levels of the analog in plasma will be elevated. Rabasa-Lhoret et al45 evaluated the effects of different reductions in insulin lispro doses and different exercise intensities in a small number of adults who had well-controlled type 1 diabetes and who began exercising 90 minutes after a breakfast meal. Because the patients already had achieved good control (mean HbA1c of 6.1%), the investigators targeted a postexercise plasma glucose level that was similar to the premeal level. Exercise intensity was varied from 25% to 75% of V̇o2max. Even at the lowest exercise workload (25% of V̇o2max for 60 minutes), hypoglycemia ensued when the normal dose of lispro was not adjusted, and a 50% dose reduction provided optimal postexercise glycemia (Fig. 7). The magnitude of the dose reduction needed for optimal glucose control increased with both the intensity and the duration of exercise. When exercise at an intensity of 50% of V̇o2max was performed for 30 minutes, a 50% dose reduction was optimal; when exercise was sustained for 60 minutes, however, a 75% decrease in the dose resulted in optimal glycemia immediately after exercise. Under these conditions, the optimal dose reduction for a given intensity or duration of exercise was associated with a 75% reduction in hypoglycemic episodes, compared with the results obtained for exercise without a change in the dose.
That study45 also highlighted one of the challenges of insulin dose reduction strategies: The reduction in the dose needed to avoid excessive hypoglycemia during exercise may not be optimal once exercise is complete. Decreases in the lispro dose resulted in rebound increases in glycemia during the recovery period after exercise (Fig. 7); the greater the magnitude of the dose reduction, the greater the elevation in glucose levels during recovery. This complication is difficult to avoid in people with insulin-dependent diabetes, who lack the normal minute-to-minute control of endogenous insulin secretion that is present in people who do not have diabetes. Modest postexercise increases in glucose levels, however, are far less dangerous than serious hypoglycemic episodes.
For patients using traditional mixtures of isophane insulin (neutral protamine Hagedorn) and regular insulin, the morning insulin dose can be reduced for planned exercise sessions. Exercise sessions in the higher range of moderate intensity require correspondingly larger dose reductions. For example, in one study, when adults with type 1 diabetes began exercising for 1 hour at 70% of V̇o2max 90 minutes after breakfast, 50% to 90% reductions in the morning insulin dose were needed to avoid exercise-related hypoglycemia.46
For patients using insulin pumps, an additional option is to reduce the rate of insulin infusion during exercise. This option can be particularly helpful when basal insulin is the primary regulator of glycemia (eg, when it has been many hours since the last administration of a meal-associated insulin bolus, such as exercise in the late afternoon). In one study, the effect of variations in pump rate was examined in children performing moderate-intensity afternoon exercise for 1 hour.47 Treadmill walking was undertaken on 2 different days to compare the effect of maintaining the basal pump rate with that of turning off the insulin pump completely. Hypoglycemia was common when the pump was used at normal rates; in contrast, exercise-related hypoglycemia was significantly reduced on days when subjects turned off the pump. In that scenario, the pump was not turned back on until 45 minutes after the cessation of exercise. On both days, glucose levels gradually rebounded after exercise was stopped, but on the day when the pump was turned off, there was a greater propensity for glycemia to exceed the preexercise baseline. This situation is analogous to that discussed above with lispro dose reductions; however, with a pump, an insulin infusion can be resumed shortly after exercise has ended.
The use of carbohydrate supplementation to minimize the occurrence of hypoglycemia during and after exercise has been examined in several studies. As discussed for other interventions, such as alterations in insulin doses, an understanding of the conditions under which the studies were performed is needed to extrapolate findings to specific exercise bouts; these conditions can include insulin dose reductions, intensity and duration of exercise, and timing of exercise relative to the last medication. For example, in one study, subjects with type 1 diabetes were given breakfast 30 minutes after a normal morning injection of regular insulin; at time intervals ranging from 1 to 5.5 hours later, they began a 60-minute moderate-intensity (50% of V̇o2max) exercise session.48 The amount of carbohydrate supplementation required to prevent the development of hypoglycemia decreased as the time interval before the commencement of exercise increased; the reduction in the need for carbohydrate supplementation paralleled the gradual reduction in plasma insulin levels.
When a similar exercise protocol was initiated 3 hours after breakfast in subjects continuing their standard basal-bolus regimen (NPH and insulin lispro), it was concluded that carbohydrate supplementation of ∼40 g was needed to maintain the desired glucose levels during exercise and the first hour of recovery.49 Likewise, a study of exercise in children indicated that an older recommendation for 15 g of carbohydrate can be inadequate in preventing hypoglycemia when the insulin dose has not been adjusted.33
In the aforementioned studies, carbohydrate requirements in patients who ate breakfast and did not alter their usual insulin dose were examined. In contrast, if patients with type 1 diabetes exercise in the morning after skipping their normal morning insulin dose (resulting in low plasma insulin levels), moderate-intensity exercise for 45 minutes may result in only a small reduction in plasma glucose levels. Under these conditions, carbohydrate supplementation can actually result in significant increases in plasma glucose levels during exercise.50 For patients who do not skip but instead reduce their insulin dose, an intermediate level of carbohydrate supplementation is appropriate. Suggestions for carbohydrate requirements and insulin dose reductions based on exercise intensity and duration have been proposed (eg, by Grimm et al51), but these should be considered merely potential starting points, to be modified on the basis of specific exercise conditions and on empirical measurements of glycemia. In addition, recommendations that minimize the practice of insulin dose reduction and rely primarily on the use of carbohydrate supplementation will lead to higher overall caloric intake; if common, this practice will negate the benefits of exercise to increase energy expenditure and stimulate weight loss.
Children can undergo large variations in physical activity levels that are sustained for many days or weeks, such as during school holiday periods. For those with insulin-dependent diabetes, sudden and sustained increases in energy expenditure can impose significant challenges to glycemic control. Strategies for optimizing glycemic control in settings such as summer diabetes camps have been examined in several studies. For example, in one camp at which participants engaged in significant levels of physical activity, frequent episodes of hypoglycemia occurred despite significant (∼30%) reductions in daily insulin doses.52 Repeated monitoring of blood glucose levels, increases in meal portions, and carbohydrate supplementation were all recommended.
In summary, real-world adjustments must be made on an empirical basis for each patient and pattern of physical activity. When possible, it is important to either delay exercise during anticipated times of peak insulin levels or make appropriate adjustments. Supplemental carbohydrate in a form that is rapidly absorbed should be kept on hand in the event of a hypoglycemic episode. More details,37–39 including a checklist of issues to consider,40 are outlined elsewhere.
Minimizing Hypoglycemic Events During Low- to Moderate-Intensity Exercise in People Who Have Type 2 Diabetes and Are Taking Medications Other Than Insulin
Various insulin secretagogues and related preparations (eg, extended-release formulations) have been developed for use in type 2 diabetes. They differ in their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, that is, the timing of insulin appearance in and disappearance from the circulation as well as the duration of their effects. Thus, guidelines for their use with exercise cannot be generalized. Published data on the tendency of exercise to result in hypoglycemia have sometimes yielded apparently conflicting results. Critical to the interpretation of results are the specific conditions under which studies were conducted, such as the starting levels of glycemia; the duration, mode, and intensity of exercise; the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the secretagogue; and the timing of exercise onset after the dose of medicine. For example, in a study of an extended-release form of glipizide, the effects of exercise in subjects who had diabetes and exercised at a very light workload for 90 minutes were evaluated.28 Under these conditions and with relatively high starting levels of glucose, this form of glipizide did not induce hypoglycemia. The glucose-lowering effect of this exercise protocol was modest, however, as shown for a control group of subjects who had diabetes but were not treated with glipizide; that is, the exercise challenge was slight, with a “buffer” of relatively high initial glucose levels.
In another study, the effects of the sulfonylurea glibenclamide were evaluated in patients exercising for 60 minutes at moderate intensity.29 The same group of patients was studied after drug treatment alone, exercise alone, or a combination. The combination of glibenclamide and exercise lowered blood glucose levels more than either intervention alone. Circulating insulin levels were higher and the exercise-induced increase in hepatic glucose output was smaller with the combination protocol than with exercise alone. Preexercise glucose levels were high (∼180 mg/dL); the patients did not experience hypoglycemia, but the authors appropriately noted that had exercise continued, the patients would have had a greater likelihood of reaching hypoglycemia in the combination trial.29 These data are entirely consistent with the view that relative hyperinsulinemia during exercise accelerates the decrease in plasma glucose levels.
Ultimately, a critical factor for patients taking insulin secretagogues is the level of insulin in the blood at the time of exercise, just as it is in patients taking exogenous insulin. An empirical determination of the dosage adjustment for a given exercise regimen should be undertaken initially. Additional monitoring of blood glucose levels before, during, and after exercise is recommended whenever an exercise regimen is significantly modified. Patients who are achieving tight control of blood glucose levels are, in turn, at greater hypoglycemic risk and should consider a reduction in medication dosage under conditions in which insulin levels would be relatively high during the exercise period. For unplanned exercise after medication has already been ingested, carbohydrate supplementation during exercise, after exercise, or both is recommended, particularly for patients in whom preexercise glucose levels are already relatively low (<100 mg/dL). In addition, there are less-common genetically inherited forms of diabetes in which the response to secretagogues and hence exercise can differ from that of most people with type 2 diabetes.53
For patients who have type 2 diabetes and who have achieved reasonably good glycemic control, guidelines indicate that medications other than insulin and insulin secretagogues do not require special adjustments for exercise.7 Drugs that act primarily by enhancing peripheral insulin action do not display a significant tendency for hypoglycemia because they do not act at steps that would interfere with the counterregulatory responses to impending hypoglycemia.54 One exception may be for patients who receive metformin therapy and who have severe hepatic insufficiency or after excessive intake of alcohol.54 The reason is that hepatic dysfunction under these conditions compromises the ability of the liver to generate glucose; because metformin acts primarily through the suppression of hepatic glucose production, patients in this category have a substantially reduced ability to prevent an onset of impending hypoglycemia.
Published data on the interactions of exercise and several other glucose-lowering medications are lacking, particularly for newer classes of therapy, such as glucagonlike peptide 1 analogs and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors. These agents have multiple effects (Tab. 2), but their efficacy is driven mostly by the potentiation of meal-induced insulin secretion and the suppression of glucagon release.55 Both of these effects are glucose dependent; that is, the effects of glucagonlike peptide 1 diminish with decreasing plasma glucose levels (unlike the ability of sulfonylureas and glinides to stimulate insulin secretion). Therefore, in the sedentary state, they have been shown to reduce the propensity for hypoglycemic episodes. The current assumptions are that they also lessen the tendency for exercise-induced hypoglycemia and that adjustments for exercise are not needed.54
Continuous High-Intensity Exercise
Glucoregulation During High-Intensity Exercise in People Without Diabetes
In people who do not have diabetes, euglycemia is not maintained as exercise intensity increases. High-intensity exercise, generally defined as a workload requiring greater than 80% of V̇o2max, is characterized by increases in plasma glucose levels (Fig. 4, closed symbols). After the cessation of exercise, glucose levels generally continue to increase and reach a peak during the immediate postexercise period. During recovery from such strenuous exercise, the restoration of glucose to preexercise levels can take up to 1 hour.56
High-intensity exercise increases the rates of hepatic glucose output and peripheral glucose uptake to greater extents than low-intensity exercise. Elevations in plasma glucose levels result from the fact that, unlike the situation with lighter workloads, with high-intensity exercise the increase in hepatic glucose production exceeds that of peripheral glucose disposal.56 Glucose production can increase by as much as 8-fold from resting rates, an increase that is as large as that seen in any physiological condition or pathological state.
The primary mechanism controlling hepatic glucose production shifts as exercise reaches more-strenuous levels (Figs. 4 and 5). Insulin secretion decreases to a lesser extent with high-intensity exercise than with moderate-intensity exercise or is maintained at basal levels. The absence of a marked reduction in insulin levels may be secondary to the prevailing hyperglycemia (a prime stimulus for insulin secretion), to a reduction in insulin degradation, or both.56 The increase in glucagon secretion during strenuous exercise remains modest (or, more precisely, the increase in the hepatic portal glucagon-to-insulin ratio is modest) and is insufficient to account for the massive stimulation of hepatic glucose output (although it likely contributes to some hepatic production). The change in growth hormone is not essential, and the modest increase in glucocorticoid levels (a steroid whose actions are exerted only after a time lag) is inconsistent with the kinetic aspects of the response, that is, the rapidity of the increase in hepatic glucose output.
Data from several different experimental approaches have suggested that catecholamines are the primary drivers of the enhanced hepatic glucose production observed during high-intensity exercise.56 During moderate-intensity exercise, catecholamine concentrations increase 2- to 4-fold above resting values; in contrast, circulating epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations are elevated 10- to 20-fold during high-intensity exercise (Fig. 4). Increases in the circulating levels of both epinephrine and norepinephrine are probably required for the full stimulation of glucose production. The administration of either catecholamine by itself (to levels commensurate with those seen during high-intensity exercise) stimulates hepatic glucose output partially,57–60 but only a combination of the 2 catecholamines can augment this process to levels approaching those observed with strenuous exercise.61 The role of hepatic sympathetic neural stimulation is equivocal; some authors59,62 have suggested that it is not essential, whereas other authors61 have suggested that the interpretation of those particular studies is complicated.
Substantial elevations in plasma catecholamine levels also may explain the observation that the hepatic production of glucose exceeds the peripheral utilization during high-intensity exercise, as others previously showed that catecholamines can partially inhibit the uptake of glucose into muscle and adipose tissue.57,58,63,64 In both people without and people with diabetes, a good correlation was demonstrated between circulating catecholamine levels and the net differential between hepatic glucose production and peripheral glucose uptake.65 In a series of studies of people who were healthy, glucose uptake across the leg was evaluated in the presence or absence of added arm exercise.66,67 The addition of arm exercise (which increased total workload and resulted in substantial elevations in plasma catecholamine levels) reduced glucose uptake across the working leg in comparison with uptake in the absence of added arm exercise. Combined arm work and leg work increased liver glucose output more than peripheral glucose disposal and increased plasma glucose levels.
However, the importance of overall adrenergic control of hepatic function during strenuous exercise is not fully understood. The inability of an adrenergic blockade to fully block glucose production during exercise at high workloads has led some researchers to postulate that additional control mechanisms may be important.17
Thus, high-intensity exercise presents an exception with regard to the control of hepatic glucose production, which is regulated under many circumstances primarily by insulin and the glucagon-to-insulin ratio. High-intensity exercise can stimulate sharp increases in hepatic glucose output even under circumstances normally associated with the suppression of glucose production. For example, when glucose production is attenuated at rest by interventions such as glucose infusion68 or carbohydrate-containing meals69 (which both result in elevations in endogenous insulin levels in people without diabetes), the subsequent imposition of high-intensity exercise still results in a substantial increase in liver glucose production (as well as the increase in circulating catecholamine levels). This hierarchy of control is important: Although most experimental investigations of glucose metabolism have been performed in the overnight fasting state, in practice people exercise much of the time in some phase of the absorptive state, that is, when endogenous glucose production is still at least partially suppressed as a result of a recent meal. A common example is the participation of children in after-school sports programs. These control mechanisms make it possible for the insulin-dependent suppression of liver glucose output to be overridden during high-intensity exercise, protecting people with diabetes from developing severe hypoglycemia.
Glucoregulation During Recovery from High-Intensity Exercise in People Without Diabetes
Plasma glucose levels peak shortly after the conclusion of a high-intensity exercise bout and then begin to return to baseline levels (Fig. 4A). Hepatic glucose output and peripheral glucose disposal decline fairly rapidly (Fig. 5). Glucose uptake initially reverses more quickly than hepatic output, resulting in further hyperglycemia, which is gradually reversed over a 1- to 2-hour period.56 Significant increases in insulin levels occur shortly after the cessation of high-intensity exercise (Fig. 4B), likely reflecting a response to the prevailing hyperglycemia in combination with a rapid withdrawal of α-adrenergic suppression of insulin secretion.
High-intensity exercise leads to rapid depletion of glycogen stores in contracting muscle fibers. It has been suggested that the hyperglycemic-hyperinsulinemic setting that occurs immediately after high-intensity exercise may be important in promoting rapid initial rates of glycogen replenishment in depleted fibers.56 This feature would be particularly important in activities characterized by multiple bouts of repeated high-intensity exercise, such as soccer or ice hockey. The more persistent enhancement of insulin action induced by muscle contraction likely contributes to further refilling of glycogen stores after plasma glucose and insulin have returned to baseline levels.15
What factors govern the rate of decline in glucose production and uptake during the initial recovery period after high-intensity exercise? A study in which insulin levels were manipulated during the recovery period indicated that insulin is not the primary factor controlling the rapid reversal of hepatic glucose production.65 More likely, the rapid shutoff of hepatic glucose output (Fig. 5C, closed symbols) is controlled by the rapid decline in circulating catecholamines, which precedes the reversal of hepatic output (possibly with an additional contribution from the shutoff of hepatic sympathetic neural stimulation). With regard to peripheral glucose metabolism, rates of glucose utilization decline when exercise ends. Although the decline in plasma glucose levels is not absolutely dependent on the hyperinsulinemic environment, variations in plasma insulin levels modulate the rate of return of glucose uptake. Studies in which insulin levels were manipulated during the recovery period indicated that elevations in plasma insulin levels are associated with higher rates of decline in blood glucose levels because of a prolonged period of enhanced peripheral glucose uptake,65,68,69 as would be expected on the basis of knowledge of the interactions between insulin and contractile activity.
Effects of High-Intensity Exercise on Glucoregulation in People With Diabetes
Although there is an abundance of published literature describing the effects of low- to moderate-intensity exercise on glucose regulation in people with type 2 diabetes, there have been surprisingly few studies of high-intensity exercise in this population. This fact is unfortunate, given the high prevalence of type 2 diabetes. The scarcity of published studies partly reflects the demographic characteristics of the type 2 population, which make high-intensity exercise much more challenging to perform (people in this population are older, obese, more sedentary, and have low physical fitness, often coupled with contraindications such as cardiovascular risk factors). Thus, most of the data on high-intensity exercise in diabetes derives from studies of younger and more physically fit people with type 1 diabetes. It is not clear whether all of the observations derived from studies of young people with type 1 diabetes can be extrapolated to other populations of people with diabetes.
The shift in the control of glucoregulation with high-intensity exercise (compared with exercise at lower intensities) presents both comforting and complicating aspects for people with diabetes. Processes regulated by insulin-independent mechanisms are generally preserved when people with diabetes engage in high-intensity work; these processes include normal increases in glucose production and disposal during and immediately after exercise as well as a normal rate of decline in glucose production after exercise. Because glucose production is controlled primarily by catecholamines, current data suggest that physically fit patients with insulin-dependent diabetes can exercise vigorously and engage in competitive sports requiring high-intensity workloads; they are less likely to develop hypoglycemia under these conditions than when they engage in low-intensity exercise. More data on responses to high-intensity exercise are needed for older, less-fit people with type 1 diabetes and for people with type 2 diabetes. One study of people with type 2 diabetes suggested that they develop hyperglycemia during extremely vigorous exercise.70 In fact, they may have a propensity for more rapid and larger increases in plasma glucose levels than people without diabetes, driven by exaggerated catecholamine responses and more rapid increases in hepatic glucose production.70 Factors controlling plasma glucose levels during high-intensity exercise are summarized in Appendix 2.
Appropriate control of glycemia during the postexercise recovery period is more challenging because of the role of insulin in modulating the postexercise decline in glucose disposal. In the recovery period after a high-intensity exercise bout, the strategies for avoiding inappropriate glucoregulation are distinctly different from those used after exercise at lower intensities. At lower intensities, a prime concern is to avoid hypoglycemia, whereas after strenuous exercise, the prevailing milieu is one of hyperglycemia. Strategies designed to mitigate the development of hypoglycemia (such as enhanced carbohydrate consumption or reduced insulin dose), important for low-intensity exercise, can exacerbate hyperglycemia after high-intensity exercise. Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes cannot generate hyperinsulinemia of endogenous origin, normally important for enhancing the rate of return of postexercise hyperglycemia to the baseline. Thus, low circulating levels of insulin (or carbohydrate supplementation or both) can prolong hyperglycemia during the recovery period, partially counteracting the beneficial effects of exercise on glucose control. If people find that their activity patterns lead to prolonged postexercise hyperglycemia, consideration should be given to the administration of insulin shortly after the completion of a high-intensity exercise session.56 Appendix 3 summarizes key factors that control the recovery from hyperglycemia after the cessation of high-intensity exercise.
Given a choice, it is much more prudent to err on the side of elevated glucose levels than hypoglycemia, but optimal glycemic management over the long term in patients who have diabetes and who exercise regularly requires an appreciation of the different effects of low-intensity exercise and high-intensity exercise on glycemic control. This knowledge, in turn, leads to different strategies for appropriately managing glucose levels with exercise. As noted above, the absolute level of glycemia depends on several factors, such as preexercise glucose and insulin levels, type of insulin used, timing of insulin administration relative to pharmacokinetic properties, and site of insulin injection. If people perform high-intensity exercise on a regular basis, then slightly smaller increases in blood glucose71 and catecholamine72,73 levels will be observed (in comparisons of bouts of the same absolute workload) as a result of adaptations to training.
Intermittent High-Intensity Exercise
In most studies investigating glucoregulation during exercise in people with diabetes, exercise protocols characterized by a constant intensity level have been used.22,23,28,29,31,32,43–46,48–50,53 Although certain sports, such as endurance running, often involve exercise at a sustained intensity level, this is not always the case (eg, interval training workouts). Other sports, in particular, many team sports, such as soccer, football, or baseball, are characterized by intermittent levels of exertion: periods of low- to moderate-intensity exercise punctuated by brief outputs of high-intensity effort. This type of activity also is more characteristic of spontaneous play in children.
Given that continuous high-intensity exercise in people with diabetes has effects quite different from those of low-intensity activity, several recent studies have evaluated the effects of exercise protocols involving intermittent bursts of high-intensity work. In a series of studies of young adults with type 1 diabetes, Guelfi and colleagues74,75 used exercise protocols designed to approximate the ratio of high-intensity effort to low-intensity effort (or recovery) characteristic of many team sports. The experiments were designed to reflect conditions that would lead to large reductions in glycemia if low-intensity exercise had been performed; that is, subjects were asked to administer their usual morning dose of insulin (no adjustment for exercise), and activity was initiated during a period when plasma insulin levels were high. In control experiments, continuous exercise at 40% of peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2peak) resulted in significant decreases in plasma glucose levels (Fig. 8). The imposition of 4-second maximal sprints repeated every 2 minutes lessened the decline in plasma glucose levels and maintained glucose at significantly higher levels during recovery (Fig. 8).74 Similar protective effects were seen when subjects performed intermittent maximal sprints with complete rest in between.75
Despite the fact that the intermittent protocol was characterized by a greater amount of total work and higher oxygen uptake, the periodic sprint bouts did not lead to more-pronounced hypoglycemia. The mechanism for the protective effect of the intermittent high-intensity protocol was then examined.76 Compared with the protocol involving continuous exercise at 40% of V̇o2 peak, the intermittent sprint protocol stimulated a more rapid increase in hepatic glucose production, which was maintained at higher levels during exercise. This was more than enough to offset a modest increase in peripheral glucose disposal. The greater stimulation of liver glucose output, in turn, was associated with higher catecholamine levels, but not with any differences in insulin or glucagon levels.74–76 These findings are consistent with catecholamines driving the higher hepatic glucose output and perhaps limiting the increase in muscle glucose uptake, but that hypothesis has not been directly evaluated for this intermittent exercise paradigm.
These findings suggest that activities characterized by intermittent high-intensity exercise may have less of a tendency for hypoglycemia than activities characterized by only continuous low-intensity exercise. These principles could be deliberately used as a strategy to avoid hypoglycemia when people are performing continuous low- to moderate-intensity exercise, that is, with the periodic insertion of brief high-intensity efforts. In a follow-up study, the effects of a single maximal sprint performed at the end of a session of exercise at 40% of V̇o2peak in subjects with type 1 diabetes were evaluated.77 On one day, the subjects rested at the end of the exercise session; on that occasion, glucose levels continued to decrease during the 2-hour recovery period. On an alternative day, the subjects performed a 10-second maximal sprint at the end of the exercise session (which caused catecholamine and lactate levels to rise sharply); glucose levels quickly stabilized and were significantly higher during the recovery period than when the sprint was not performed (Fig. 9).
The deliberate use of intermittent high-intensity sprint bouts is best suited for children and relatively young adults; it would be more impractical for older, less-fit people (and more likely to be contraindicated). Nevertheless, it represents an additional strategy for mitigating the likelihood of hypoglycemia in some people. In practice, the effects of superimposing brief high-intensity efforts should be determined empirically with frequent glucose monitoring. Further experimental studies of intermittent exercise regimens are warranted.
As noted above, aerobic exercise programs can be challenging for many people with diabetes, such as people with significant obesity, people with very low levels of aerobic fitness, or elderly patients with sarcopenia, severe arthritis, or both. For others, aerobic exercise may be contraindicated because of the presence of diabetic complications, such as cardiovascular disease or advanced peripheral neuropathy. Exercise programs based on progressive resistance training represent an alternative mode of exercise for these patients as well as a supplementary form of exercise for patients with diabetes in general.
Progressive resistance training offers multiple benefits to patients, such as increasing muscle mass and strength (force-generating capacity), increasing energy expenditure, reducing visceral adipose tissue, improving lipid profiles, increasing bone density, and counteracting the age-related tendency for sarcopenia.78,79 Resistance training, particularly programs that emphasize high-intensity sessions with correspondingly lower aerobic aspects, can be used for patients who have difficulty performing aerobic exercise or who have specific contraindications.78
Few published longitudinal studies of the benefits of resistance exercise for glycemic control in diabetes had appeared a decade ago. After that time, several small studies, performed mostly with subjects who had type 2 diabetes and, in many cases, lacking randomization of subjects, had suggested that resistance training improved various indexes of glycemic control (for details, see discussions elsewhere13,78–80). These studies were followed by several randomized controlled trials with subjects who had type 2 diabetes, in which resistance training programs lasting 4 to 6 months resulted in improvements in glycemic control in the same range as that shown for aerobic exercise programs.81,82
Several factors may contribute to the improvement in glycemic control seen with resistance exercise training programs: (1) increases in muscle mass, which provide a larger reservoir for glucose disposal; (2) direct effects on skeletal muscle that increase glucose transport activity; and (3) improvements secondary to a loss of adipose tissue (in particular, visceral adipose tissue, which is known to be a contributor to insulin resistance). Determining the relative contributions of each of these factors is challenging. The direct effects of resistance exercise on muscle glucose uptake were evaluated in a study in which people who were healthy and patients with type 2 diabetes trained only one leg.83 Measurements of glucose uptake and glucose transporter content in each leg demonstrated increased GLUT4 glucose transporter density per unit of muscle in the strength-trained leg. Glucose clearance in the trained leg was also increased—and to a greater extent than could be explained by the increased muscle mass of the trained leg. Thus, the results of that study83 demonstrated that local adaptations in skeletal muscle, similar to the well-known effects of endurance exercise protocols, is an important contributor to improvements in glucose homeostasis in people who have diabetes and undergo resistance exercise training. These effects should add to the benefits associated with increases in total muscle mass.
Other studies have demonstrated that exercise programs combining aspects of both endurance training and resistance training can lead to significant improvements in indexes of glycemic control,84,85 including at least one small study of adolescents with type 1 diabetes.86 In one recently published study, the effects of aerobic training and resistance training singly and in combination were evaluated.87 The authors reported that although each program independently lowered HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes, the combination training regimen was significantly more effective than either exercise mode alone. Interpretation of the results is complicated by the fact that the combination training regimen was characterized by a much greater total duration of exercise; thus, it cannot be deduced whether the greater benefit resulted from the increased exercise duration or the combination of the 2 different types of exercise. Nevertheless, that study87 affirmed that these 2 types of exercise can be combined in an effort to add variety to workouts and attain benefits, such as increased muscle strength, that are complementary to those provided by aerobic exercise alone. (See the article by Marcus et al88 in this issue for a study of combined aerobic and resistance exercise intervention in people with diabetes.)
Professional organizations, such as the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association, now recommend that resistance training be included in the treatment of diabetes.7,89 The literature on resistance exercise training, however, provides very little discussion of the frequency of hypoglycemia associated with weight training, nor are there specific recommendations regarding changes in diabetes medications.
Both aerobic and resistance exercise programs have the potential to improve glycemic control in diabetes. Aerobic exercise confers additional benefits to the heart and vasculature; resistance exercise counters age-related sarcopenia and provides other benefits. Aerobic exercise sessions must be carefully managed in patients with diabetes treated with exogenous insulin or insulin secretagogues because of the importance of insulin concentrations in regulating glucose metabolism during low- to moderate-intensity exercise and during recovery from exercise. An understanding of the factors that contribute to hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia is essential to the proper use of exercise programs.
Several important areas will benefit from additional research. The dearth of published data addressing potential interactions between antidiabetic medications and exercise in type 2 diabetes is surprising, given the fact that exercise and dietary modification are the first-line therapeutic interventions. More studies are needed to characterize the effects of different exercise intensities on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes (eg, exercise programs used by specific populations, such as elderly people). Data are needed to strengthen the underlying assumption that special precautions are not needed for exercise in patients who have type 2 diabetes and are taking medications other than insulin or insulin secretagogues. For type 1 diabetes, more data on the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic potentials of exercise are needed for older people, who are much less fit than the younger people who are usually the subjects of studies of type 1 diabetes. Studies of potential sex differences related to exercise in diabetes are generally lacking as well.
Additional studies of exercise protocols that more closely approximate the activity patterns of common sports are needed (eg, intermittent exertion with various intensity levels and rest periods). What combinations of intensity levels and rest intervals trigger a switch from glucose-lowering effects, with a concomitant threat of hypoglycemia, to a setting characterized by hyperglycemia? Is the propensity of high-intensity exercise to generate hyperglycemia reduced with repeated exercise sessions, given that catecholamine levels tend to be lowered by training? Is the potential for prolonged exercise to impair counterregulatory responses to a subsequent hypoglycemic challenge reduced when exercise is performed on a regular basis?
Regarding resistance training, there is a need for a more detailed evaluation of the frequency of either hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. What are the relative benefits of various forms of resistance training (eg, powerlifting, bodybuilding, and circuit training)? What levels of training frequency and intensity are needed to derive minimal as well as maximal benefits? Of particular interest to physical therapists, who often prescribe resistance exercises for specific muscle groups, is how much muscle mass must be engaged to derive training-induced glycemic benefits or, alternatively, pose a threat of hypoglycemia? Answers to questions such as these will provide more-specific guidelines for exercise prescriptions and will enable people with diabetes to derive more of the potential glycemic benefits of exercise.
- Received April 16, 2008.
- Accepted July 7, 2008.
- American Physical Therapy Association