HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ptj.20060308v1 88/2/261    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Herbert, W. J Articles by Basso, D M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Herbert, W. J Articles by Basso, D M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Influence of Feedback Schedule in Motor Performance and Learning of a Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Task Using Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging: A Randomized Clinical Trial

WJ Herbert, PT, MS, is PhD Candidate, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Graduate Program, and Graduate Research Associate, Division of Physical Therapy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
DG Heiss, PT, PhD, DPT, OCS, is Associate Professor and Director, Division of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Medical Professions, College of Medicine, and Participating Faculty, Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, The Ohio State University, 453 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210-1234 (USA).
DM Basso, PT, EdD, is Associate Professor, Division of Physical Therapy, Assistant Director, School of Allied Medical Professions, and Associate Professor, Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University.

Deborah.Heiss{at}osumc.edu

Background and Purpose: Low back pain (LBP) may be associated with inadequate multifidus muscle function. Varying the frequency and timing of feedback may enhance acquisition and retention of multifidus muscle recruitment during exercise.

Subjects: Subjects without LBP (n=30) were randomly assigned to a constant (CON) or variable (VAR) feedback group. Twenty-eight subjects (mean age=28 years, SD=8.0; mean body mass index=24 kg/m², SD=0.70) completed training, and 23 completed retention testing.

Methods: Eight training sessions over 4 weeks included multifidus muscle exercise with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) feedback. Retention was assessed at 1 week and 1 month.

Results: At the start, both groups had similar performances of multifidus muscle recruitment (Fisher exact test, P=.26). Early in training, the CON group had good success (mean=80%) that was maintained at session 8 (mean=84%), with no difference between sessions 1 and 8 (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]=–9%, 42%). The VAR group gradually increased success (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.002, 95% CI=17%, 59%) between sessions 1 and 8. Both groups sustained their session 8 success when tested for short-term retention at 1 week (CON group: Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.79; VAR group: Wilcoxon signed rank test, P=.36). At the long-term retention test, the VAR group outperformed the CON group (Wilcoxon score test, P=.04), indicating superior motor learning.

Discussion and Conclusion: Variable feedback provided by RUSI resulted in greater success in lumbar multifidus muscle recruitment up to 3 to 4 months after training.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?