PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published on April 11, 2007

Physical Therapy 2007;87:704.

Physical Therapy
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20060169

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ptj.20060169v1
87/6/704    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Segal, R. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Segal, R. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Neuroimaging in Rehabilitation

Use of Imaging to Assess Normal and Adaptive Muscle Function

Richard L Segal

RL Segal, PT, PhD, is Professor and Director, Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Allied Health Sciences; Faculty, Program in Human Movement Science; and Faculty, Curriculum in Neurobiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7135, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7135 (USA).

Richard_Segal{at}med.unc.edu

Physical therapists must be able to determine the activity and passive properties of the musculoskeletal system in order to accurately plan and evaluate therapeutic measures. Discussed in this article are imaging methods that not only allow for the measurement of muscle activity but also allow for the measurement of cellular processes and passive mechanical properties noninvasively and in vivo. The techniques reviewed are T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, MR spectroscopy, cine–phase-contrast MR imaging, MR elastography, and ultrasonography. At present, many of these approaches are expensive and not readily available in physical therapy clinics but can be found at medical centers. However, there are ways of using these techniques to provide important knowledge about muscle function. This article proposes creative ways in which to use these techniques as evaluative tools.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. L Craik
Till We Meet Again
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2007; 87(7): 830 - 832.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. L Craik
Let's Get On With It!
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 631 - 633.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. K Shields
Neuroimaging in Rehabilitation: A Resource for Clinicians
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 639 - 640.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physical Therapy Association.