PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 88, No. 1, January 2008, pp. 43-49
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20060179

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow The Bottom Line
Right arrow The Bottom Line Podcast
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ptj.20060179v1
88/1/43    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, C. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Landel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, C. M
Related Collections
Right arrow Injuries and Conditions: Spine
Right arrow Tests and Measurements
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Intertester Reliability and Validity of Motion Assessments During Lumbar Spine Accessory Motion Testing

Rob Landel, Kornelia Kulig, Michael Fredericson, Bernard Li and Christopher M Powers

R Landel, PT, DPT, OCS, CSCS, is Associate Professor of Clinical Physical Therapy, Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy at the School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, 1540 E Alcazar St, CHP 155, Los Angeles, CA 90033 (USA)
K Kulig, PT, PhD, is Associate Professor of Clinical Physical Therapy, Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy at the School of Dentistry, University of Southern California
M Fredericson, MD, is Associate Professor, Department of Functional Restoration, Division of Sports Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif, and Director of Stanford Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics
B Li, PT, DPT, is Resident, USC Orthopedic Residency, Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy at the School of Dentistry, University of Southern California
CM Powers, PT, PhD, is Associate Professor, Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy at the School of Dentistry, University of Southern California

Address all correspondence to Dr Landel at: rlandel{at}usc.edu

Background and Purpose: Posterior-anterior (PA) assessment of the lumbar spine correlates with radiographic signs of instability and can guide treatment choices, yet studies of the validity of lumbar PA assessments have not been conducted in vivo. The purposes of this study were to determine the intertester reliability of the PA examination in assessing intersegmental lumbar spine motion and to evaluate the validity of this procedure in vivo with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Subjects: Twenty-nine subjects with central lumbar pain participated in this study.

Methods: Two physical therapists independently identified each subject's most and least mobile lumbar segments using the PA procedure. Midsagittal lumbar images were obtained simultaneously during one examiner's assessment. Lumbar segmental mobility was quantified from magnetic resonance images as the change in the intervertebral angle between the resting position and the end range of the PA force application. For each vertebral level tested, maximal sagittal-plane segmental motion was determined.

Results: The intertester reliability for identifying the least mobile segment was good (agreement=82.8%, kappa=.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]=.48 to .94), but it was poor for identifying the most mobile segment (kappa=.29, 95% CI=–.13 to .71), despite good agreement (79.3%). The level of agreement between the PA assessments and intervertebral motion measured by MRI was poor (kappa=.04, 95% CI=–.16 to .24, and kappa=.00, 95% CI=–.09 to .08, for the least and most mobile segments, respectively).

Discussion and Conclusion: Despite good intertester reliability for identifying the least mobile segment, PA assessments of lumbar segmental mobility did not agree with sagittal-plane motion measured by dynamic MRI. This finding calls into question the validity of the PA procedure for assessing intervertebral lumbar spine motion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J H. Abbott
On "Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments..." Landel et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:43-49.
Physical Therapy, April 1, 2008; 88(4): 536 - 536.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. Landel, K. Kulig, M. Fredericson, B. Li, and C. M Powers
Author Response
Physical Therapy, April 1, 2008; 88(4): 536 - 537.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physical Therapy Association.