PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 88, No. 9, September 2008, pp. 986-988
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2008.88.9.986

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craik, R. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Craik, R. L
Related Collections
Right arrow All Editorials
Right arrow Rebecca Craik
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Editorials

The 2008/2009 Editorial Board

Rebecca L Craik, Editor in Chief


This is the time of year when I suffer "scrambled brain." There is so much to do before the start of the new academic year, and so little time. I begin a project and then get pulled in a different direction because suddenly something else seems more important and the deadline is right now. I’m sure you know the feeling. The juggling act becomes very complicated. Will the full complement of new physical therapist students show up on the first day? Will I find a better way to teach the neuroscience content this year? Will the grant that we are rewriting for an October 1 deadline get funded this year? Will the guest lecturers show up for their allotted time? Meanwhile, at home, tomatoes need to be picked and canned—but that's on hold because the corn just got ripe, and there is corn relish to make. Should we make peach jam, or freeze the peaches? Can I let the weeds crowd the beans and beets for another week?

One enterprise that really produces "scrambled brain" is scholarly publishing. Changes in technology, the growing number of journals, and easier Web access to information/misinformation challenge us to figure out ways to keep PTJ's content vital and compelling. Our dynamic Web site (www.ptjournal.org) and our Bottom Line summaries, video clips, and podcasts are designed to reach you through different venues. When we adopt new standards for manuscript submission and fine-tune our Editorial Board, we are seeking to improve the quality of the content delivered on paper, online, and in your ear.

I want to introduce you to our new Editorial Board members for 2008/2009, who, in addition to reviewing manuscripts, will help PTJ deepen its content areas, broaden its author and reader base, and refine its approach to the presentation of research, especially clinical trials, cohort studies, and observational studies. All of our new Editorial Board members are international: two from Australia, one from the Netherlands, and one from the United Kingdom. They also are multidisciplinary: two are physical therapists, one is a rheumatologist, and one is a psychologist. I encourage you to visit PubMed to view their extensive publication histories. You will find their work to be impressive and innovative:

As we welcome these new colleagues, I want to thank Dan Cipriani, PT, PhD, for his service on the Editorial Board over the past 2 years. He is now rotating off the Editorial Board but will continue to review for PTJ. Dan helped us make the transition to a more thorough statistical review of manuscripts, which led us to recognize that we need more people with his expertise. Several statistical consultants have joined the PTJ enterprise: Steven Hanna, PhD, John E Hewett, PhD, Hang Lee, PhD, and Samuel Wu, PhD. Already these experts have helped us provide essential guidance to authors earlier in the review process. We owe a special thanks to Steve, who has helped us formulate our approach to statistical reporting and continues to offer critical insights about the process.

Despite all of the balls in the air waiting to get caught, I have to stop for a moment, take a deep breath—and enjoy the fact that there is so much to do. We are lucky to have such excellent Editorial Board members and to live in a time when there are so many ways to communicate basic research and clinical information. What a great way to begin a new academic year!


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. L Craik
Does Clinical Education Need a Series of Tools to Assess Success?
Physical Therapy, October 1, 2008; 88(10): 1106 - 1108.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craik, R. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Craik, R. L
Related Collections
Right arrow All Editorials
Right arrow Rebecca Craik
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physical Therapy Association.