|
|
||||||||
Research Reports |
MH Jan, PT, MS, is Associate Professor, School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
HM Chai, PT, PhD, is Lecturer, School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
YF Lin, MD, is Orthopaedic Surgeon, Taipei City Hospital, and a doctoral student, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
JCH Lin, PT, MS, is a doctoral student, Department of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif
LY Tsai, PT, MS, and YC Ou, PT, MS, are Senior Physical Therapists, Department of Physical Therapy, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
DH Lin, MD, is Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, En Chu Kong Hospital, Taiwan (mhjan{at}ntu.edu.tw)
Address all correspondence to Dr Lin
Submitted October 25, 2004;
Accepted March 15, 2005
| Abstract |
|---|
Key Words: Aging Heel-rise Manual muscle test Plantar flexor
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Numerous methods have been developed to assess muscle strength, such as manual muscle testing (MMT),5,6 tests using handheld dynamometers,7,8 and isokinetic testing.911 Clinically, MMT is more frequently used than the other methods by virtue of its simplicity and convenience. No expensive instruments are required during testing, and it can be applied virtually instantaneously.5,6 Although MMT might yield subjective data or can be onerous to perform, depending on the examiner's strength, in comparison with the other methods, it remains the most popular clinical method to identify muscle weakness.
According to the grading system of traditional MMT, muscle strength is judged by the muscle's ability to resist either gravity alone or gravity plus the examiner's strength.5,6 The strength of the ankle plantar flexors graded in the prone position and against the examiner's strength is insufficient for the use required of the flexors in daily activities. Therefore, the challenge in designing MMT for the plantar flexors has been to find a technique that is able to exert a force to counter the force that supports body weight rather than to counter the examiner's strength.
A modified method, therefore, has been proposed using the repeated one-leg heel-rise test.5,6 The ability of a person to perform 20 or more repetitions of one-leg heel-rise in a standing position in good form (without loss of balance or showing fatigue) is considered to indicate "normal" strength of the plantar flexors, regardless of the individual's age or sex or the activity level.5,12 However, it is well known that muscle strength is closely related to a person's age and sex.1318 Indeed, our clinical experience has shown that most women without known pathology or impairments and older men with normal function in their lower extremities are nonetheless incapable of achieving 20 repetitions of one-leg heel-rise in good form. In an effort to approach a more realistic assessment, the purpose of our study was to investigate the number of repetitions of the one-leg heel-rise test required for normal plantar-flexor strength in different groups of subjects categorized by age and sex.
| Method |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The strategy to recruit participants was designed based on participants' willingness and equal numbers of both sexes for each decade group from 21 to 80 years of age. Initially, a sample of convenience of 207 people (105 men, 102 women) volunteered to participate in the study. Subsequent exclusions were based on an inability to walk continuously for 30 minutes without joint pain (n=8) and presence of a regular exercise regimen (n=12). In addition, 7 people chose to drop out after an explanation of the details of the experiment. Thus, a total of 180 volunteers (90 men, 90 women) participated in the study. All participants signed an informed consent statement approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital prior to taking part in the study.
Although participants from 6 decades of age were initially recruited, the data were collapsed for adjacent decades and re-grouped into 3 age groups during statistical analysis. Because no statistical differences were evident in the achieved number of heel-rise repetitions between the age groups of 21 to 30 years and 31 to 40 years, the age group of 41 to 50 years and 51 to 60 years, and the age groups of 61 to 70 years and 71 to 80 years (all P>.05), the participants were regrouped into 3 age groups: 21 to 40 years, 41 to 60 years, and 61 to 80 years. For an analysis of power=.8 and
=.05, the sample size is around 29 for making the group differences of 6.6 (which was the least group mean difference in this study) between the means of any 2 age groups with a pooled standard deviation of 10. Therefore, for each age x sex group, the sample size of 30 is enough to obtain a power greater than .8.
One-Leg Heel-Rise Test
The testing procedure and criteria for test completion were based on Lunsford and Perry's suggestions12 and are described briefly as follows. Each one-leg heel-rise action was completed with the first second spent raising the heel up and the following second lowering the heel down. A metronome was used to set a beat corresponding to the rhythm of the heel-rise. The participant was encouraged to try his or her best to repeat heel-rise actions until one of the following situations occurred: the plantar-flexion angle recorded was less than 50% of the maximum angle; the participant rocked back and forth, left and right, or lost balance; the participant's fingers pressed down deeply on the examiner's shoulder; the straight knee joint of the tested lower extremity (LE) bent; or the participant was unable to raise his or her heel again. The maximum angle was defined as the first repetition of the one-leg heel-rise test. If the angle monitored during the test was less than 50% of the maximum angle, then the test was terminated. During the whole experimental procedure, the knee of the tested LE was maintained straight and only finger-touch support was allowed (ie, participants were permitted to gently put 1 or 2 fingers on the examiner's shoulder for balance). The test also was terminated if the knee of the tested LE bent a bit or the examiner felt the pressure applied by the participant become greater or deeper.
The angle of ankle plantar flexion was monitored using a Biometrics K100 electrogoniometer* as participants performed the one-leg heel-rise test. This electrogoniometer consisted of a 12-bit analog-to-digital converter box and 2 sensors attached to the participant that were capable of measuring their relative position in space. The system has been reliably used for a similar purpose.22 One sensor was placed at the dorsum of the tested foot between the second and third metatarsal heads, and the other sensor was fastened along the midline of the middle third of the anterior aspect of lower leg (Fig. 1).12 Signals acquired with use of the analog-to-digital converter were transmitted to a personal computer, which stored and displayed the real-time data of angular motion of ankle plantar flexion.
|
The one-leg heel-rise test was performed by asking the participants to raise their heel repetitively with maximum effort during the one-leg stance. The number of repetitions of heel-rise at the test termination was regarded as an indication of the strength of the plantar flexors. Before the test started, participants were permitted to practice several times to be familiar with the test process. There were 3 examiners for each participant during the test. One examiner provided the finger-touch support and counted the total number heel rises accomplished. Another examiner observed the participant laterally for any extraneous trunk lean or knee flexion. The third examiner read the electrogoniometer output on the monitor and terminated the test if the plantar-flexion angle became less than 50% of the maximum angle. It took approximately 20 minutes to complete the whole experimental process.
To assess the intrarater reliability of data for the heel-rise repetitions measurement protocol, 20 participants were repeatedly measured 1 week apart. The participants and the 3 examiners were asked not to memorize or recall the previous record. The resulting intraclass correlation coefficient was .89, suggesting high intrarater reliability of data for the one-leg heel-rise test.
Data Analysis
We used SPSS 10.0 software
for the statistical analyses. Descriptive statistics were used to depict the participants' demographic characteristics, including age, body height, body weight, and body mass index. A 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences in those characteristics among age x sex groups. A multiple regression of heel-rise repetition was performed to analyze the association of heel-rise repetitions with age, sex, body weight, and height.
Means and standard deviations of the heel-rise repetitions were calculated to examine the variability of the results. The differences in heel-rise repetitions among different age groups and sexes were determined by 2-way ANOVA. A P value of .05 or below was considered significant. If any significance was found, post hoc comparisons were further tested with Bonferroni adjustment (P<.017). The number of individuals who achieved more than 20 repetitions and the repetitions that the 80th percentile of participants achieved also were recorded to be compared with Lunsford and Perry's suggestions.12
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Descriptive data of heel-rise repetition for both sexes within each age group are presented in Table 2, including means, standard deviations, ranges, and the repetitions that the 80th percentile of participants achieved. For each age group, women accomplished significantly less than men did at the corresponding age group (P<.001). For either sex, significant differences in heel-rise repetitions were noted among age groups (P<.001 for both sexes). Bonferroni multiple-comparison tests revealed that the heel-rise repetitions were significantly different for each 2 age groups (all P<.002, Fig. 2), indicating that the number of heel-rise repetitions decreased significantly as the participant's age increased every 20 years (P<.001). In addition, the 80th percentiles of the male participants were 17, 7, and 2 repetitions for the age groups of 21 to 40, 41 to 60, and 61 to 80 years, respectively. Those of the female participants were 10, 5, and 1 repetitions, respectively.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Muscle Strength and Balance Decreases With Age
Muscle strength weakens with increasing age.1,1518 Consistent with these findings, no participant more than 60 years of age in the present study attained 20 repetitions of one-leg heel rise, with the majority of them achieving only 2 or fewer repetitions. Decreasing performance with age is attributed to age-related changes in the structure and function of muscle fibers within the muscle belly.23,24 These changes include shrinkage of muscle fiber, decrease in the number of muscle fibers, reduction of functional motoneurons, and slowdown of reaction rates.23 Therefore, older adults did not perform as well as the young and middle-aged adults.
In addition to decreasing muscle strength, balance control is of immense importance in the one-leg heel-rise test. Older adults display a deterioration in proprioception, vestibular system function, and other mechanisms that control body balance.2528 According to the effect of these age-related changes of muscle and proprioception, older adults are destined to have poor performance in a repeated heel-rise test.
Influences of Sex on Heel-Rise Repetitions
In general, muscle strength differs between men and women.15,25,29 Muscle strength of women is generally less than that of men due to the smaller physiological cross-sectional area of their involved muscles.15,25,30 Our study results support this point. However, our results were not consistent with those of another study of the one-leg heel-rise test,12 where, using the same testing method, no differences in maximum heel-rise repetitions due to sex were apparent. The dichotomy between our results and the previous results may be due to the participants. Only sedentary participants were included in our study, while Lunsford and Perry12 made no attempt to monitor participants' sports activities. It has been well documented that exercise workouts or sports participation affect ankle plantar-flexor strength.20,21 Furthermore, the resistance applied during the one-leg heel-rise test is the performer's body weight. The body weight of the male participants in the study by Lunsford and Perry12 was approximately 20 kg greater than that of the female participants, whereas the body weight of the male participants in our study was only about 10 kg more than that of the female participants. The difference in the male participants' body weight might explain the discrepancy in the results for sex difference.
Different Criteria for Normal Grade of Plantar-Flexor Muscles Should Be Considered
The present results support the contention that the different standards used for "normal" grade of ankle plantar-flexor strength for different ages and for both sexes needs to be considered. Lunsford and Perry12 increased the proposed grade of normality to 25 repetitions of heel rise. In 1995, Hislop and Montgomery5 proposed 20 repetitions of heel rise to be the normal criterion for the plantar flexors. Neither Lunsford and Perry nor Hislop and Montgomery, however, considered the affects of age-related decline or sex difference on muscle strength. Using the same experimental method as that of the study by Lunsford and Perry, the average performance of heel-rise repetition was quite different for both sexes and the age groups in our study. We cannot discount the possibility that the differences in regard to age and sex might be predisposed by racial or cultural differences between Westerners and Easterners. It has been reported that 37.0% to 62.7% of Western people19,3133 but only 20.5% of the Taiwanese population34 exercise regularly. In addition, previous researchers3537 have indicated definite ethnic differences in muscle strength and physical fitness. The sharp contrast to Lunsford and Perry's findings, as reflected our findings that none of the men greater than 60 years of age and no woman greater than 40 years of age achieved 20 repetitions of one-leg heel-rise, warrants further efforts to establish normative data for various races or people of various lifestyles.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital.
The results of this study were presented orally at the Annual Research Conference of Physical Therapy Association of the Republic of China; September 21, 2003; Taipei, Taiwan.
* Biometrics Ltd, Unit 25, Nine Mile Point Industrial Estate, Newport, Gwent, NP11 7HZ, United Kingdom. ![]()
SPSS Inc, 233 S Wacker Dr, Chicago, IL 60606. ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Pieper, R. S. Kirsner, T. N. Templin, and T. J. Birk Injection Drug Use: An Understudied Cause of Venous Disease Arch Dermatol, October 1, 2007; 143(10): 1305 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |