PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

PHYS THER
Vol. 87, No. 7, July 2007, pp. 930-934
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.2006.0182.0197.0198.ar
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, D. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Allen, D. D
Related Collections
Right arrow Kinesiology/Biomechanics
Right arrow Motor Control and Motor Learning
Right arrow Tests and Measurements
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Movement Continuum Theory

Author Response

Diane D Allen


Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the full text and any section headings.


   Introduction
 
My thanks to Cott, Finch, Martin, and Sullivan for their comments on the 3 articles about the 6 dimensions of movement and the Movement Ability Measure (MAM). Their insights make a commendable start for the discussion that I hope will ensue with the publication of these articles. In responding to their comments, I will address some of the issues they raise regarding the 6-dimensional extension of the Movement Continuum Theory (MCT) and the development and evaluation of the MAM.


   Response to the Commentary by Cott and Finch
 
Cott and Finch advocate for theoretical development in physical therapy. In 1995, they proposed the MCT1 as a grand theory of physical therapy, with movement as the focus and purview of physical therapists. In the current series of articles, I propose a subdivision of the construct of movement into 6 dimensions—flexibility, strength, accuracy, speed, adaptability, and endurance. The logic and elegance of the original MCT should have ensured its wide reception . . . [Full Text of this Article]


   Response to the Commentary by Martin
 

   Response to the Commentary by Sullivan
 

   Conclusion
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physical Therapy Association.