PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 86, No. 8, August 2006, p. 1108

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebral Palsy
Right arrow Cerebral Palsy (Pediatrics)
Right arrow Tests and Measurements
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

The Bottom Line

M Kathleen Kelly

M Kathleen Kelly, PT, PhD, Assistant Professor & Vice Chair, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.


Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the full text and any section headings.


    What problems did the researchers set out to study, and why?
 
Field tests of aerobic capacity can provide valid, reliable outcome measurements without the burden of expensive equipment in a sophisticated laboratory setting. To date, however, there are no validated field tests for measuring aerobic fitness in children or adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP), and there is a paucity of exercise test protocols appropriate for children with CP. These authors adapted a commonly used field test—the shuttle run test (SRT)—to accommodate children classified at level I or level II on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). A separate protocol was designed for each level (SRT-1 and SRT-2). The protocols . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Who participated in the study?
 

    What new information does this study offer?
 

    How did the researchers go about the study?
 

    How might the results of this study apply to patients who are treated by physical therapists from this point forward?
 

    What are the limitations of the study, and what further research is needed?
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Reliability and Validity of Data for 2 Newly Developed Shuttle Run Tests in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Olaf Verschuren, Tim Takken, Marjolijn Ketelaar, Jan Willem Gorter, and Paul JM Helders
Physical Therapy 2006 86: 1107-1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physical Therapy Association.