|
|
||||||||
Letters and Responses |
| Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the full text and any section headings. |
To the Editor:
As an ultrasound device manufacturer, I read with great interest "A Calibration Study of Therapeutic Ultrasound Units" in the March 2002 issue of Physical Therapy. I applaud the efforts of the authors in promoting an awareness that therapeutic ultrasound devices need to be calibrated annually as per the recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The results of the study, however, should be taken with a grain of salt. The wattmeter used to check the calibration of the equipment is not approved by the FDA, and I contend that measuring ±20% with a meter that has an accuracy of ±10% is really not good science when FDA-approved meters with an accuracy of ±3% (eg, a device produced by Ohmic Instruments*) are available.
I would encourage a new study that utilizes state-of-the-art technology to perform the measurements. I think the findings would show a strong
President/CEO
Rich-Mar Corp
Technical Director
Ohmic Instruments Company
Assistant Professor
Physical Therapy Program
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Amarillo, TX 79106
(brismee@ama.ttuhsc.edu)
Associate Professor
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Physical Therapist
BSA Hospital
Amarillo, Tex
Associate Professor
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Related Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Physical Therapy 2002 82: 257-263.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J Straub, L. D Johns, and S. M Howard Variability in Effective Radiating Area at 1 MHz Affects Ultrasound Treatment Intensity Physical Therapy, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 50 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |