PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 82, No. 6, June 2002, pp. 616-618

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coffey, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coffey, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Physical Agents/Modalities
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letters and Responses

Measurement Accuracy


Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor:

As an ultrasound device manufacturer, I read with great interest "A Calibration Study of Therapeutic Ultrasound Units" in the March 2002 issue of Physical Therapy. I applaud the efforts of the authors in promoting an awareness that therapeutic ultrasound devices need to be calibrated annually as per the recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The results of the study, however, should be taken with a grain of salt. The wattmeter used to check the calibration of the equipment is not approved by the FDA, and I contend that measuring ±20% with a meter that has an accuracy of ±10% is really not good science when FDA-approved meters with an accuracy of ±3% (eg, a device produced by Ohmic Instruments*) are available.

I would encourage a new study that utilizes state-of-the-art technology to perform the measurements. I think the findings would show a strong . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Ken Coffey

President/CEO
Rich-Mar Corp

Denes Roveti

Technical Director
Ohmic Instruments Company

Jean-Michel Brismée

Assistant Professor
Physical Therapy Program
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Amarillo, TX 79106
(brismee@ama.ttuhsc.edu)

Neal Latman

Associate Professor
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Paul Artho

Physical Therapist
BSA Hospital
Amarillo, Tex

Steven Sawyer

Associate Professor
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

A Calibration Study of Therapeutic Ultrasound Units
Paul A Artho, Jason G Thyne, Barry P Warring, Chris D Willis, Jean-Michel Brismée, and Neal S Latman
Physical Therapy 2002 82: 257-263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. J Straub, L. D Johns, and S. M Howard
Variability in Effective Radiating Area at 1 MHz Affects Ultrasound Treatment Intensity
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 50 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Physical Therapy Association.