PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 81, No. 10, October 2001, pp. 1731-1733

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cibulka, M. T
Right arrow Articles by Riddle, D. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cibulka, M. T
Right arrow Articles by Riddle, D. L
Related Collections
Right arrow Injuries and Conditions: Hip
Right arrow Evidence-Based Practice
Right arrow Tests and Measurements
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letters and Responses

Clinical Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction


Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor:

I would like to comment on an article that appeared in the May 2001 issue titled "Using Published Evidence to Guide the Examination of the Sacroiliac Joint Region" by Janet Freburger and Daniel Riddle.

I read with great interest their description of how to determine the best evidence when identifying sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction. Surprisingly, when I read the same evidence, I disagreed with many of their conclusions. I believe a major problem is that considerable emphasis in the Update was placed on 2 types of studies: injection studies of the SIJ and movement studies using radiostereophotogrammetric (RSA) analysis. Both methods, however, have serious methodological flaws that were not discussed in the Update.

First, I agree that injection of the SIJ can be difficult to interpret because of insufficient infiltration; however, I believe the real problem is that no SIJ injection study has yet used a randomized . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Michael T CibulkaPT, MHS, OCS

Jefferson County Rehab & Sports Clinic
430 S Truman Blvd
Crystal City, MO 63019

Janet K Freburger and Daniel L Riddle

Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
725 Airport Rd, CB #7590
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590
Department of Physical Therapy
Virginia Commonwealth University
1200 E Broad St, PO Box 980224
Richmond, VA 23298-0224


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Using Published Evidence to Guide the Examination of the Sacroiliac Joint Region
Janet K Freburger and Daniel L Riddle
Physical Therapy 2001 81: 1135-1143. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Physical Therapy Association.