PHYS THER
Vol. 80, No. 2, February 2000, pp. 150-151
Author Comment
G Kelley Fitzgerald, PT, PhD,
Michael J Axe, MD and
Lynn Snyder-Mackler, PT, ScD
| Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the full text and any section headings. |
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
We appreciate the opportunity to respond to and clarify some of the issues raised during this provocative discussion of our article. The program we described is designed to help clinicians both identify and manage athletes with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury who may have the ability to return, at least temporarily, to premorbid levels of physical activity after nonoperative treatment. We view our treatment approach not as an alternative to ACL reconstruction but as a method for improving the risk/benefit ratio for nonoperative management in special circumstancesthat is, when patients want to delay surgery and play out the remainder of the season.
Mr Wilk questioned whether the randomization failed with respect to the level of physical activity to which our subjects returned after rehabilitation. He also questioned whether the screening and rehabilitation are timely enough for an athlete to return for a . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Related Article
-
Outcomes and Aging
- Cindy Myers, G Kelley Fitzgerald, Michael J Axe, and Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Physical Therapy 2000 80: 526-527.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
Copyright © 2000 by the American Physical Therapy Association.