PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 89, No. 1, January 2009, pp. 38-47
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20080033

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow The Bottom Line
Right arrow Discussion Podcast
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ptj.20080033v1
89/1/38    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, J. A
Right arrow Articles by Magel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, J. A
Right arrow Articles by Magel, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Injuries and Conditions: Neck
Right arrow Professional Issues
Right arrow Randomized Controlled Trials
Right arrow Continuing Education
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Does Continuing Education Improve Physical Therapists’ Effectiveness in Treating Neck Pain? A Randomized Clinical Trial

Joshua A Cleland, Julie M Fritz, Gerard P Brennan and Jake Magel

JA Cleland, PT, PhD, OCS, FAAOMPT, is Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Franklin Pierce University, 5 Chenell Dr, Concord, NH 03301 (USA); Physical Therapist, Rehabilitation Services, Concord Hospital, Concord, New Hampshire; and Faculty, Regis University Manual Therapy Fellowship Program, Denver, Colorado
JM Fritz, PT, PhD, ATC, is Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Clinical Outcomes Research Scientist, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah
GP Brennan, PT, PhD, is Director for Clinical Quality and Outcomes Research, Intermountain Healthcare
J Magel, PT, DSc, OCS, FAAOMPT, is Director, Intermountain Orthopedic and Spine Therapy, Intermountain Healthcare

Address all correspondence to Dr Cleland at: joshcleland{at}comcast.net

Background and Purpose: Physical therapists often attend continuing education (CE) courses to improve their overall clinical performance and patient outcomes. However, evidence suggests that CE courses may not improve the outcomes for patients receiving physical therapy for the management of neck pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of an ongoing educational intervention for improving the outcomes for patients with neck pain.

Participants: The study participants were 19 physical therapists who attended a 2-day CE course focusing on the management of neck pain. All patients treated by the therapists in this study completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and a pain rating scale at the initial examination and at their final visit.

Methods: Therapists from 11 clinics were invited to attend a 2-day CE course on the management of neck pain. After the CE course, the therapists were randomly assigned to receive either ongoing education consisting of small group sessions and an educational outreach session or no further education. Clinical outcomes achieved by therapists who received ongoing education and therapists who did not were compared for both pretraining and posttraining periods. The effects of receiving ongoing education were examined by use of linear mixed-model analyses with time period and group as fixed factors; improvements in disability and pain as dependent variables; and age, sex, and the patient's initial NDI and pain rating scores as covariates.

Results: Patients treated by therapists who received ongoing education experienced significantly greater reductions in disability during the study period (pretraining to posttraining) than those treated by therapists who did not receive ongoing training (mean difference=4.2 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.69, 7.7). Changes in pain did not differ for patients treated by the 2 groups of therapists during the study period (mean difference=0.47 point; 95% CI=–0.11, 1.0). Therapists in the ongoing education group also used fewer visits during the posttraining period (mean difference=1.5 visits; 95% CI=0.81, 2.3).

Discussion and Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that ongoing education for the management of neck pain was beneficial in reducing disability for patients with neck pain while reducing the number of physical therapy visits. However, changes in pain did not differ for patients treated by the 2 groups of therapists. Although it appears that a typical CE course does not improve the overall outcomes for patients treated by therapists attending that course, more research is needed to evaluate other educational strategies to determine the most clinically effective and cost-effective interventions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. M. Williams, C. G. Maher, M. J. Hancock, J. H. McAuley, A. J. McLachlan, H. Britt, S. Fahridin, C. Harrison, and J. Latimer
Low Back Pain and Best Practice Care: A Survey of General Practice Physicians
Arch Intern Med, February 8, 2010; 170(3): 271 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
G. Jull
Invited Commentary
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 48 - 50.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physical Therapy Association.