|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Reports |
MA Risberg, PT, PhD, is Associate Professor and Chairman, Norwegian Research Center for Active Rehabilitation (NAR), Orthopedic Center, Ullevaal University Hospital; Norwegian Sport Medicine Clinic (NMI); and Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
I Holm, PT, PhD, is Professor, Rikshospitalet Medical Center, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
G Myklebust, PT, PhD, is Associate Professor, Norwegian Sport Medicine Clinic (NIMI) and Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
L Engebretsen, MD, PhD, is Professor and Chairman, Division of Neuroscience and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Ullevaal University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo
Address all correspondence to Dr Risberg at: mayarnarisberg{at}hotmail.com
Background and Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a 6-month neuromuscular training (NT) program versus a traditional strength training (ST) program following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Subjects: Seventy-four subjects with ACL reconstruction participated in the study.
Methods: The study was a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. The NT and ST groups were tested preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months. The main outcome measure was the Cincinnati Knee Score. Secondary outcome measures were visual analog scales (VASs) for pain and function, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), hop tests, isokinetic muscle strength, proprioception, and static and dynamic balance tests.
Results: The NT group demonstrated significantly improved Cincinnati Knee Scores and VAS scores for global knee function compared with the ST group at the 6-month follow-up. There were no significant differences between the groups for the other outcome measures (ie, hop, balance, proprioception, and muscle strength tests).
Discussion and Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that exercises included in the NT program should be part of the rehabilitation program following ACL reconstruction.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Agel and R. F. LaPrade Assessment of Differences Between the Modified Cincinnati and International Knee Documentation Committee Patient Outcome Scores: A Prospective Study Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2009; 37(11): 2151 - 2157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Risberg and I. Holm The Long-term Effect of 2 Postoperative Rehabilitation Programs After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial With 2 Years of Follow-Up Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2009; 37(10): 1958 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R J Butler, K I Minick, R Ferber, and F Underwood Gait mechanics after ACL reconstruction: implications for the early onset of knee osteoarthritis Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2009; 43(5): 366 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I Eitzen, I Holm, and M A Risberg Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2009; 43(5): 371 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Renstrom, A Ljungqvist, E Arendt, B Beynnon, T Fukubayashi, W Garrett, T Georgoulis, T E Hewett, R Johnson, T Krosshaug, et al. Non-contact ACL injuries in female athletes: an International Olympic Committee current concepts statement Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 42(6): 394 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |