| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Research Reports |
JK Freburger, PT, PhD, is Research Associate and Fellow, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
TS Carey, MD, MPH, is Director, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, and Professor, Departments of Medicine and Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
GM Holmes, PhD, is Research Associate and Fellow, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
(janet_freburger{at}unc.edu) Address all correspondence to Dr Freburger at 725 Airport Rd, CB#7590, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590 (USA)
Background and Purpose. Evidence on the effectiveness of physical therapy for the management of chronic spine disorders is limited. The purpose of this study was to use a large current database, the National Spine Network database, to assess the effectiveness of physical therapy in the management of chronic spine disorders.
Subjects. The participants were people who had spine problems lasting 3 months or longer and who were seen for an initial visit and a follow-up visit (N=4,479) at 1 of 17 US spine centers.
Methods. A propensity score approach was used to create a matched sample of participants who received physical therapy (intervention group) and participants who did not receive physical therapy (control group). The 2 groups were similar with regard to more than 50 baseline characteristics. Outcomes were assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).
Results. Both the intervention and control groups improved between the initial and the follow-up visits on ODI scores and on SF-36 physical function, role physical, and bodily pain scores. Although the amount of improvement in the outcome measures was significantly greater for the intervention group than for the control group, the differences were small (3–5 points). When the subgroup of participants who had the greatest propensity for receiving physical therapy was examined, differences in the amount of improvement between the intervention and control groups were larger (5–13 points). Discussion and Conclusion. Physical therapy was effective in the management of chronic spine disorders in participants with the greatest propensity for receiving physical therapy. When the entire sample was considered, differences in the amount of improvement between the intervention and control groups were not clinically relevant. [Freburger JK, Carey TS, Holmes GM. Effectiveness of physical therapy for the management of chronic spine disorders: a propensity score approach.
Key Words: Back pain • Effectiveness • Neck pain • Observational studies • Physical therapy
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. G Macedo, C. G Maher, J. Latimer, and J. H McAuley Motor Control Exercise for Persistent, Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Physical Therapy, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 9 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Resnik, D. Liu, D. L Hart, and V. Mor Benchmarking Physical Therapy Clinic Performance: Statistical Methods to Enhance Internal Validity When Using Observational Data Physical Therapy, September 1, 2008; 88(9): 1078 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Deutscher, D. L Hart, R. Dickstein, S. D Horn, and M. Gutvirtz Implementing an Integrated Electronic Outcomes and Electronic Health Record Process to Create a Foundation for Clinical Practice Improvement Physical Therapy, February 1, 2008; 88(2): 270 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
