HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Frontera, W. R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Frontera, W. R Related Collections Health Services Research Physical Therapist Practice: Other Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity— Executive Summary

Walter R Frontera, MD, PhD, Harvard Medical School/Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Mass
Marcus J Fuhrer, PhD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
Alan M Jette, PT, MPH, PhD, FAPTA, Boston University, Boston, Mass
Leighton Chan, MD, MPH, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
Rory A Cooper, PhD, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa
Pamela W Duncan, PT, PhD, FAPTA, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla
John D Kemp, JD, Powers, Pyles, Sutter, & Verville, PC, Washington, DC
Kenneth J Ottenbacher, PhD, University of Texas Medical Branch/Galveston, Galveston, Tex
P Hunter Peckham, PhD, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Elliot J Roth, MD, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Ill
Denise G Tate, PhD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich

(wfrontera{at}partners.org) Address all correspondence to: Walter R Frontera, MD, PhD, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, 125 Nashua St, Boston, MA 02114

The general objective of the Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers, (2) research environment, infrastructure, and culture, (3) funding, (4) partnerships, and (5) metrics. The [approximately] 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small-group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?