HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Laufer, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Laufer, Y. Related Collections Adaptive/Assistive Devices Gait Disorders Balance Hemiplegia/Paraplegia/Quadriplegia Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

The Effect of Walking Aids on Balance and Weight-Bearing Patterns of Patients With Hemiparesis in Various Stance Positions

Y Laufer, PT, PhD, is Head, Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Israel 31905 (yocheved{at}research.haifa.ac.il). At the time of data collection, she was also on the staff of the Physical Therapy Department, Flieman Geriatric Rehabilitation Hospital, Ramot Remez, Haifa, Israel

Background and Purpose. Standard and quad canes are often prescribed to patients with hemiparesis, yet their effect on postural control remains unclear. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine the effects of standard and quad canes on postural sway and on weight-bearing patterns in patients with hemiparesis. Subjects. Thirty subjects with a diagnosis of unilateral hemiparesis following a stroke (patient group; mean age=71.2 years, SD=7.0) and 20 age-matched, community-dwelling volunteers without hemiparesis (comparison group; mean age=72.1 years, SD=5.2) participated in the study. Methods. Postural sway and percentage of body weight (%BW) borne by each extremity were measured in 3 positions: with the heels aligned with each other (aligned position) and in staggered foot positions with either the affected or unaffected extremity placed forward (affected FW and unaffected FW positions). All subjects were tested in each position with no cane, a standard cane, and a quad cane. The order of tests was randomized, and analysis of data included use of an analysis of variance and adjusted Tukey-Kramer tests. Results. In both the aligned and unaffected FW positions, postural sway was reduced only with the quad cane. Both types of canes reduced postural sway in the affected FW position; however, the quad cane had a greater effect. An asymmetrical weight distribution between the lower extremities did not change in the patient group across positions, even with walking aids. Discussion and Conclusion. A quad cane appears to be more effective than a standard cane in decreasing postural sway in patients with moderate impairment secondary to hemiparesis during stance. The greatest effect on postural sway occurred when the assistive device was contralateral to the foot placed forward. The use of a cane does not appear to adversely affect the asymmetrical weight-bearing pattern during stance that is characteristic of patients with hemiparesis, even when balance is challenged by decreasing the base of support.

Key Words: Canes • Hemiplegia • Postural sway • Weight bearing

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Maguire, J. M Sieben, M. Frank, and J. Romkes Hip abductor control in walking following stroke -- the immediate effect of canes, taping and TheraTogs on gait Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2010; 24(1): 37 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Elmamoun and G. Mulley Walking sticks and frames for patients with neurological disorders Practical Neurology, February 1, 2007; 7(1): 24 - 31. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pohl and J. Mehrholz Immediate effects of an individually designed functional ankle-foot orthosis on stance and gait in hemiparetic patients Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2006; 20(4): 324 - 330. [Abstract] [PDF]