PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 82, No. 2, February 2002, pp. 138-147

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, D. E
Right arrow Articles by Gill-Body, K. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, D. E
Right arrow Articles by Gill-Body, K. M
Related Collections
Right arrow Gait Disorders
Right arrow Kinesiology/Biomechanics
Right arrow Balance
Right arrow Vestibular System Disorders
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Is Base of Support Greater in Unsteady Gait?

David E Krebs, Dov Goldvasser, Joyce D Lockert, Leslie G Portney and Kathleen M Gill-Body

DE Krebs, PT, PhD, is Professor, MGH Institute of Health Professions, 101 Merrimac St, Boston, MA 02114-4719 (USA) (KREBS{at}HELIX.MGH.HARVARD.EDU), and Director, Massachusetts General Hospital Biomotion Laboratory, Boston, Mass.
D Goldvasser, MScE, is Research Associate, Massachusetts General Hospital Biomotion Laboratory
JD Lockert, PT, MS, is in private practice at Advantage Sports Medicine, Woburn, Mass. She was a master's degree student at MGH Institute of Health Professions at the time of this study
LG Portney, PT, PhD, is Associate Professor, MGH Institute of Health Professions
KM Gill-Body, PT, MS, NCS, is Assistant Professor, MGH Institute of Health Professions, and Clinical Associate, Physical Therapy Services, Massachusetts General Hospital

Address all correspondence to Dr Krebs at the first address

Background and Purpose. We investigated dynamic interfoot distance (IFD) throughout the gait cycle in people with unsteady gait caused by vestibulopathy and in people without known neuromuscular pathology. We expected that the subjects with unsteady gait would use a greater IFD than subjects without neuromuscular pathology and that this IFD would be correlated with other measures of locomotor stability. Subjects and Methods. Simultaneous whole-body (11-segment) dynamic kinematic data were collected from 22 subjects with vestibulopathy and 22 subjects without known neuromuscular pathology who were matched for age, height, weight, and body mass index. Two trials each of the participants' gait at preferred speed and paced gait at 120 steps/min were analyzed with a repeated-measures design with multiple dependent variables. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and with inferential statistics. Results. Interfoot distance at preferred gait speed did not differentiate unsteady subjects with vestibulopathy from the comparison subjects. Paced gait IFD total range and IFD in single-limb support differed between groups, but IFD at heel-strike did not. However, IFD at heel-strike, the traditional measure of "base-of-support width," was correlated with measurements of whole-body center-of-gravity stability (r=.32–.55). Discussion and Conclusion. Gait at preferred speed permitted the unsteady subjects and the comparison subjects to select similar IFD values, but at the cost of slower gait in the unsteady subjects. When required to walk at a "normal" pace of 120 steps/min, subjects with vestibulopathy increased their IFD. These data suggest that wide-based gait alone cannot differentiate between subjects with and without balance impairments. Base of support and other whole-body kinematic variables are mechanical compensations of vestibulopathic instability. Further studies are needed to determine whether development of active control of these whole-body control variables can occur after vestibular rehabilitation.

Key Words: Gait • Interfoot distance • Kinematics • Stability • Vestibular dysfunction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
G. F Marchetti, S. L Whitney, P. J Blatt, L. O Morris, and J. M Vance
Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Gait During Performance of the Dynamic Gait Index in People With and People Without Balance or Vestibular Disorders
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2008; 88(5): 640 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
S. S. Sajko and M. R. Pierrynowski
Influence of Treadmill Design on Rearfoot Pronation During Gait at Different Speeds
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, September 1, 2005; 95(5): 475 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C J. van Uden, C J. van der Vleuten, J G. Kooloos, J H Haenen, and H Wollersheim
Gait and calf muscle endurance in patients with chronic venous insufficiency
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2005; 19(3): 339 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. Morton and A. J. Bastian
Relative Contributions of Balance and Voluntary Leg-Coordination Deficits to Cerebellar Gait Ataxia
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 1844 - 1856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Physical Therapy Association.