PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 79, No. 2, February 1999, pp. 159-170

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roush, S. E
Right arrow Articles by Sonstroem, R. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roush, S. E
Right arrow Articles by Sonstroem, R. J
Related Collections
Right arrow Professional-Patient Relations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Development of the Physical Therapy Outpatient Satisfaction Survey (PTOPS)

Susan E Roush and Robert J Sonstroem

SE Roush, PhD, PT, is Associate Professor, Physical Therapy Program, University of Rhode Island, 25 W Independence Way, Kingston, RI 02881 (USA) (roush{at}uriacc.uri.edu). Address all correspondence to Dr Roush
RJ Sonstroem, PhD, is Professor Emeritus, Physical Education Department, University of Rhode Island

Background and Purpose. The purposes of this 3-phase study were (1) to identify the underlying components of outpatient satisfaction in physical therapy and (2) to develop a test that would yield reliable and valid measurements of these components. Subjects. Three samples, consisting of 177, 257, and 173 outpatients from 21 facilities, were used in phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Methods and Results. In phase 1, principal component analyses (PCAs), reliability checks, and correlations with social desirability scales were used to reduce a pool of 98 items to 32 items. These analyses identified a 5-component model of outpatient satisfaction in physical therapy. The phase 2 PCA, with a revised pool of 48 items, indicated that 4 components rather than 5 components represented the best model and resulted in the 34-item Physical Therapy Outpatient Satisfaction Survey (PTOPS). Factor analyses conducted with phase 2 and phase 3 data supported this conclusion and provided evidence for the internal validity of the PTOPS scores. The 4-component scales were labeled "Enhancers," "Detractors," "Location," and "Cost." Responses from subsamples of phase 3 subjects provided evidence for validity of scores in that the PTOPS components of "Enhancers," "Detractors," and "Cost" appeared to differentiate overtly satisfied patients from overtly dissatisfied patients. "Location" and "Enhancer" scores discriminated subjects with excellent attendance at scheduled physical therapy sessions from those with poor attendance. Conclusion and Discussion. In this study, we identified components of outpatient satisfaction in physical therapy and used them to develop a test that would yield valid and reliable measurements of these components.

Key Words: Patient satisfaction • Physical therapy • Survey development


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Telemed TelecareHome page
L. Piron, A. Turolla, P. Tonin, F. Piccione, L. Lain, and M. Dam
Satisfaction with care in post-stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home
J Telemed Telecare, July 1, 2008; 14(5): 257 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
P. F Beattie, R. M Nelson, and A. Lis
Spanish-Language Version of the MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy Care (MRPS): Preliminary Validation
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 793 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
P. Beattie, M. Dowda, C. Turner, L. Michener, and R. Nelson
Longitudinal Continuity of Care Is Associated With High Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy, October 1, 2005; 85(10): 1046 - 1052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. L Clemence and D. A Seamark
GP referral for physiotherapy to musculoskeletal conditions--a qualitative study
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2003; 20(5): 578 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. Monnin and T. V Perneger
Scale to Measure Patient Satisfaction With Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2002; 82(7): 682 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
P. F Beattie, M. B. Pinto, M. K Nelson, and R. Nelson
Patient Satisfaction With Outpatient Physical Therapy: Instrument Validation
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2002; 82(6): 557 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. E Roush, R. J Sonstroem, M. S Goldstein, S. D Elliott, and A. A Guccione
Patient/Client Satisfaction
Physical Therapy, April 1, 2001; 81(4): 1061 - 1063.
[Full Text]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M. S Goldstein, S. D Elliott, and A. A Guccione
The Development of an Instrument to Measure Satisfaction With Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2000; 80(9): 853 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Physical Therapy Association.