PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 78, No. 8, August 1998, pp. 814-828

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olney, S. J
Right arrow Articles by McBride, I. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olney, S. J
Right arrow Articles by McBride, I. D
Related Collections
Right arrow Gait Disorders
Right arrow Kinesiology/Biomechanics
Right arrow Stroke (Neurology)
Right arrow Stroke (Geriatrics)
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Multivariate Examination of Data From Gait Analysis of Persons With Stroke

Sandra J Olney, Malcolm P Griffin and Ian D McBride

SJ Olney, PhD, is Professor, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 (olneys@post.queensu.ca).
MP Griffin, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University.
ID McBride is Research Associate, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University.

Background and Purpose. Gait analyses yield redundant information that often is difficult to interpret. The purpose of this study was to show how principal-component analysis can provide insight into gait data obtained from persons with stroke. Subjects. Twenty male and 11 female adults who were ambulatory were studied (mean age=60.5 years, SD=11.8, range=24–79; mean time since stroke=11.4 months, SD=15.4, range=2.0–88.0). Methods. Spatial data were used in a 4-segment link-segment model to calculate the kinematic and kinetic variables of gait. Principal components were constructed on the averages for 40 variables. Results. The first principal component was related to speed and accounted for 40.8% of the variance. The second principal component was related to differences between the 2 limbs (symmetry) and accounted for 12.8% of the variance. The third principal component was related to adoption of a postural flexion bias and accounted for 10.2% of the variance. The fourth principal component, which was not interpretable, accounted for 6.8% of the variance. Conclusion and Discussion. The principal-component analysis allowed clustering of related variables and simplified the complex picture presented by the large number of variables resulting from gait analysis. Examination of variables closely related to each principal component yielded insight into the nature of the strategies used in walking and their interrelationships. The method has potential for insight into similarities and differences in gait performances arising from different pathologies and for comparing the progress of individuals with similar pathologies.

Key Words: Biomechanics • Cerebrovascular disorders • Gait • Locomotion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
T. Krasovsky and M. F. Levin
Review: Toward a Better Understanding of Coordination in Healthy and Poststroke Gait
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2010; 24(3): 213 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
P.-l. Wong, K. Chamari, A. Chaouachi, D. W. Mao, U. Wisloff, and Y. Hong
Difference in plantar pressure between the preferred and non-preferred feet in four soccer-related movements
Br. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2007; 41(2): 84 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. J. Olney, J. Nymark, B. Brouwer, E. Culham, A. Day, J. Heard, M. Henderson, and K. Parvataneni
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Supervised Versus Unsupervised Exercise Programs for Ambulatory Stroke Survivors
Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 476 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
O. Donchin, J. T. Francis, and R. Shadmehr
Quantifying Generalization from Trial-by-Trial Behavior of Adaptive Systems that Learn with Basis Functions: Theory and Experiments in Human Motor Control
J. Neurosci., October 8, 2003; 23(27): 9032 - 9045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
G. Kwakkel and R. C Wagenaar
Effect of Duration of Upper- and Lower-Extremity Rehabilitation Sessions and Walking Speed on Recovery of Interlimb Coordination in Hemiplegic Gait
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2002; 82(5): 432 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
H. Sadeghi, P. Allard, and M. Duhaime
Contributions of Lower-Limb Muscle Power in Gait of People Without Impairments
Physical Therapy, December 1, 2000; 80(12): 1188 - 1196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. D. Sanger
Human Arm Movements Described by a Low-Dimensional Superposition of Principal Components
J. Neurosci., February 1, 2000; 20(3): 1066 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Physical Therapy Association.