PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 78, No. 3, March 1998, pp. 289-300

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maher, C. G
Right arrow Articles by Adams, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maher, C. G
Right arrow Articles by Adams, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Manual Therapy
Right arrow Injuries and Conditions: Spine
Right arrow Clinical Decision Making
Right arrow Examination/Evaluation: Other
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness

Christopher G Maher, Maureen Simmonds and Roger Adams

CG Maher, PhD, PT, MMPAA, is Senior Lecturer, School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, East Street, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia 2141 (c.maher@cchs.usyd.edu.au).
M Simmonds, PhD, PT, is Assistant Professor, School of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman's University, Houston, Tex.
R Adams, PhD, is Senior Lecturer, School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney.

Background and Purpose. The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attempted to clarify the concept of spinal stiffness by examining the relationships among 31 published spinal stiffness descriptors using cluster analysis. Subjects and Methods. Each stiffness descriptor was printed on a magnetized rubber strip. Physical therapists in Houston (Tex) and Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) judged the similarity of the stiffness descriptors by arranging them on a board. The squared Euclidean distance between words was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method. Results. Cluster analysis reduced the 31 stiffness descriptors to three superclusters (limited mobility, increased mobility, and viscoelasticity) in both the Houston and Sydney data. Conclusion and Discussion. In a step toward improving the reliability of spinal stiffness judgments, this study has identified the fundamental characteristics of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. Research is now needed to clearly define these characteristics and then develop protocols that will allow physical therapists to reliably rate these attributes.

Key Words: Cluster analysis • Lumbar spine • Palpation • Semantics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. Landel, K. Kulig, M. Fredericson, B. Li, and C. M Powers
Intertester Reliability and Validity of Motion Assessments During Lumbar Spine Accessory Motion Testing
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Physical Therapy Association.