PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 78, No. 3, March 1998, pp. 259-270

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernhardt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Matyas, T. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernhardt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Matyas, T. A
Related Collections
Right arrow Kinesiology/Biomechanics
Right arrow Injuries and Conditions: Upper Extremity
Right arrow Stroke (Neurology)
Right arrow Examination/Evaluation: Other
Right arrow Stroke (Geriatrics)
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Accuracy of Observational Kinematic Assessment of Upper-Limb Movements

Julie Bernhardt, Patricia J Bate and Thomas A Matyas

J Bernhardt, PT, is a doctoral candidate in the Schools of Physiotherapy and Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. She completed this research in partial fulfillment of her degree requirements.
PJ Bate, PhD, PT, is Senior Lecturer, School of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University.
TA Matyas, PhD, is Reader, School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University.

Background and Purpose. This study investigated the accuracy of physical therapists' visual judgments about kinematic features of the upper-limb movements of people without neurological impairments and people with neurological impairments following a cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Subjects. Ten experienced physical therapists served as observers. Eleven people with a primary diagnosis of cortical or subcortical CVA and 4 older individuals without neurological impairments participated as "performers." Methods. The performers were videotaped as they completed a transport task. Three videotapes were edited to form three physical scales of peak movement speed, jerkiness, and hand path indirectness. On two occasions, therapists viewed these videotapes and made judgments about each performance on visual analog scales. Therapists' visual judgments were then compared with criterion measures determined by three-dimensional instrumented analysis. Results. The accuracy of the therapists' judgments was investigated using regression methods. Therapists were able to make moderately to highly accurate judgments of movement speed (r≥.87), jerkiness (r≥.78), and hand path indirectness (r≥.68). These judgments remained highly stable over time (r≥.82). Differences in therapists' judgment models, evident from slope and intercept variability in the regression models, were reflected in lower intertherapist agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients=.65–.85). Conclusion and Discussion. Experienced physical therapists accurately and reliably judged kinematic aspects of performance using observational assessment. Observational kinematic assessment warrants further systematic investigation.

Key Words: Assessment • Cerebrovascular disorders • Kinematics • Observational assessment • Reliability • Upper limb • Validity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
M. L. Ebersole and T. J. Armstrong
Analysis of an Observational Rating Scale for Repetition, Posture, and Force in Selected Manufacturing Settings
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, January 1, 2006; 48(3): 487 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. M. Carey, D. F. Abbott, G. F. Egan, J. Bernhardt, and G. A. Donnan
Motor Impairment and Recovery in the Upper Limb After Stroke: Behavioral and Neuroanatomical Correlates
Stroke, March 1, 2005; 36(3): 625 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. L McGinley, P. A Goldie, K. M Greenwood, and S. J Olney
Accuracy and Reliability of Observational Gait Analysis Data: Judgments of Push-off in Gait After Stroke
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2003; 83(2): 146 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. M. Michaelsen, A. Luta, A. Roby-Brami, and M. F. Levin
Effect of Trunk Restraint on the Recovery of Reaching Movements in Hemiparetic Patients
Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32(8): 1875 - 1883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Physical Therapy Association.