PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 78, No. 10, October 1998, pp. 1118-1119

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, W. A
Right arrow Articles by Aeschlimann, A. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, W. A
Right arrow Articles by Aeschlimann, A. G
Related Collections
Right arrow Tests and Measurements
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letters and Responses

An Alternative Way to Display SF-36 Results for Individual Patients

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

To the Editor:

Standardized assessment of outcomes has become increasingly important in the comprehensive physical therapy and rehabilitation management of patients. Health care professionals measure outcomes to adjust treatments and to improve processes and results of care. Outcomes measurement has been substantially improved in the past decade by the creation of psychometrically sound, condition-specific and generic health status instruments. Although these instruments are now commonly included in clinical research, in our opinion they are not yet widely used in patient care. Possible reasons are the additional administrative load and difficulty in the interpretation of end scores.1–3 Health status instruments, therefore, should be brief and yield scores that are easy to interpret.

Among the currently available instruments, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), covering physical, psychological, and social aspects of health status, has found wide acceptance, in part because of its brevity....


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
M Weigl, F Angst, G Stucki, S Lehmann, and A Aeschlimann
Inpatient rehabilitation for hip or knee osteoarthritis: 2 year follow up study
Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2004; 63(4): 360 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Physical Therapy Association.