HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Byl, N. N Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Byl, N. N Related Collections Physical Agents/Modalities Pharmacology Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

The Use of Ultrasound as an Enhancer for Transcutaneous Drug Delivery: Phonophoresis

NN Byl, PhD, PT, is Associate Professor, Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 374 Parnassus Ave, Box 0736, San Francisco, CA 94122 (USA).

Phonophoresis is the use of ultrasound (US) to enhance the delivery of topically applied drugs. The purposes of this article are (1) to review the basic principles of transcutaneous drug delivery, (2) to summarize the functional anatomy of the skin pertinent to phonophoresis, (3) to outline the physiological principles of US as an enhancer of topically applied drugs, (4) to review the literature on the efficacy of phonophoresis, (5) to discuss the relevance of US as an enhancer of topical drugs in the practice of physical therapy, and (6) to outline areas of needed research. Seventy-five percent of the studies reviewed reported positive effects of US on local subcutaneous drug diffusion, but some systemic effects were reported. This research review indicates that to maximize the clinical effectiveness of phonophoresis: (1) the topical drug (both the drug and the carrying agent) should transmit US; (2) the skin should be pretreated with US, heating, moistening, or shaving; (3) the patient needs to be positioned to maximize circulation during treatment; (4) a dressing that seals the area and prevents the escape of moisture should be applied after treatment; (5) an intensity of 1.5 W/cm² should be used to capture both the thermal and nonthermal effects of the US; and (6) low-intensity US (0.5 W/cm²) should be used when treating open wounds or acute injuries. Research is needed to clarify what parameters of US will most efficiently facilitate topical drug diffusion, how often and for what duration US should be used to maximize local absorption of drugs, and which topical drugs can most effectively be used for phonophoresis.

Key Words: Phonophoresis • Ultrasound

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y.-L. Hsieh Effects of Ultrasound and Diclofenac Phonophoresis on Inflammatory Pain Relief: Suppression of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase in Arthritic Rats Physical Therapy, January 1, 2006; 86(1): 39 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P Johnson Physical Therapist Management of an Adult With Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee Physical Therapy, July 1, 2005; 85(7): 665 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Cagnie, E. Vinck, S. Rimbaut, and G. Vanderstraeten Phonophoresis Versus Topical Application of Ketoprofen: Comparison Between Tissue and Plasma Levels Physical Therapy, August 1, 2003; 83(8): 707 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C Panus, K. E Ferslew, B. Tober-Meyer, and R. L Kao Ketoprofen Tissue Permeation in Swine Following Cathodic Iontophoresis Physical Therapy, January 1, 1999; 79(1): 40 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]