| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Research Reports |
Bogataja Gros
a Aimovii
U Bogataj, PhD, is Researcher and Head, Laboratory for Biocybernetics, Department of Biocybernetics, Automation, and Robotics, Joef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, 61111 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
N Gros, PT, is Research Physiotherapist and Instructor, Institute of the Republic of Slovenia for Rehabilitation, Linhartova 52, 61111 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
M Kljaji, PhD, is Professor, University of Maribor, School of Organisational Science, Preernova 11, 64000 Kranj, Slovenia, and Consulting Researcher, Joef Stefan Institute.
R Aimovi, MD, is Co-Director, Institute of the Republic of Slovenia for Rehabilitation.
M Malei, BSc, is Researcher, Department of Biocybernetics, Automation, and Robotics, Joef Stefan Institute.
Background and Purpose. Gait rehabilitation in patients with severe hemiplegia requires substantial effort. Preliminary studies indicate potential beneficial effects of using multichannel functional electrical stimulation (MFES) for gait rehabilitation in these patients. In this study, a new method of gait rehabilitation for nonambulatory patients with hemiplegia by means of MFES added to conventional therapy was introduced. The results of the method's application were evaluated by comparing it with conventional therapeutic methods. Subjects. The proposed rehabilitation method was tested on a group of 20 patients with severe hemiplegia secondary to cerebrovascular accident. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group received 3 weeks of MFES followed by 3 weeks of conventional therapy. The other group received 3 weeks of conventional therapy followed by 3 weeks of MFES. Methods. The effects of each therapeutic method were evaluated by measurements of temporal-distance variables and ground reaction forces and by assessment of each subject's physical status according to the Fugl-Meyer evaluation scale. Results. There was improved performance of the subjects during MFES combined with conventional therapy as compared with conventional therapy alone. Conclusion and Discussion. The superiority of the MFES method as compared with conventional therapy was mainly attributed to the enhanced motor learning accomplished by application of MFES. These results, however, are preliminary, and further research is needed.
Key Words: Electrotherapy • Functional electrical stimulation • Gait • Gait rehabilitation
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. B. Stein, D. G. Everaert, A. K. Thompson, Su Ling Chong, M. Whittaker, J. Robertson, and G. Kuether Long-Term Therapeutic and Orthotic Effects of a Foot Drop Stimulator on Walking Performance in Progressive and Nonprogressive Neurological Disorders Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2010; 24(2): 152 - 167. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. M. Kesar, R. Perumal, A. Jancosko, D. S. Reisman, K. S. Rudolph, J. S. Higginson, and S. A. Binder-Macleod Novel Patterns of Functional Electrical Stimulation Have an Immediate Effect on Dorsiflexor Muscle Function During Gait for People Poststroke Physical Therapy, January 1, 2010; 90(1): 55 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Dickstein Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 649 - 660. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. H Bakhtiary and E. Fatemy Does electrical stimulation reduce spasticity after stroke? A randomized controlled study Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 418 - 425. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. I. Kottink, H. J Hermens, A. V Nene, M. J Tenniglo, C. G Groothuis-Oudshoorn, and M. J IJzerman Therapeutic Effect of an Implantable Peroneal Nerve Stimulator in Subjects With Chronic Stroke and Footdrop: A Randomized Controlled Trial Physical Therapy, April 1, 2008; 88(4): 437 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. J. Daly, K. Roenigk, J. Holcomb, PhD, J. M. Rogers, K. Butler, J. Gansen, J. McCabe, E. Fredrickson, E. B. Marsolais, and R. L. Ruff A Randomized Controlled Trial of Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Subjects Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 172 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Bates, J. Y. Choi, P. W. Duncan, J. J. Glasberg, G. D. Graham, R. C. Katz, K. Lamberty, D. Reker, and R. Zorowitz Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: Executive Summary Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): 2049 - 2056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W. Duncan, R. Zorowitz, B. Bates, J. Y. Choi, J. J. Glasberg, G. D. Graham, R. C. Katz, K. Lamberty, and D. Reker Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: A Clinical Practice Guideline Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): e100 - e143. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Yan, C. W. Y. Hui-Chan, and L. S. W. Li Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Motor Recovery of the Lower Extremity and Walking Ability of Subjects With First Acute Stroke: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial Stroke, January 1, 2005; 36(1): 80 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R P. Van Peppen, G Kwakkel, S Wood-Dauphinee, H J. Hendriks, P. J Van der Wees, and J Dekker The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2004; 18(8): 833 - 862. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
