PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 75, No. 2, February 1995, pp. 145-149

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, S. E
Right arrow Articles by Buono, M. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, S. E
Right arrow Articles by Buono, M. J
Related Collections
Right arrow Physical Agents/Modalities
Right arrow Cardiovascular/Pulmonary System: Other
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Effect of Continuous-Wave Ultrasound on Blood Flow in Skeletal Muscle

Steven E Robinson and Michael J Buono

SE Robinson, PT, is Assistant Head, Physical Therapy Department, Naval Hospital, San Diego, CA 92134.
MJ Buono, PhD, is Professor, Departments of Biology and Physical Education, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182.

Background and Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ultrasound on forearm, skin, and muscle blood flow. Subjects. Twenty volunteers without known vascular problems (10 male, 10 female) participated. Methods. All subjects received a treatment of continuous-wave ultrasound to the anterior forearm at a dosage of 1.5 W/cm2 for a duration of 5 minutes. The contralateral forearm served as the control and received identical treatment, except the ultrasound output remained at zero. Forearm blood flow was measured using venous occlusion plethysmography, and skin blood flow was measured using cutaneous laser-Doppler flowmetry before and after ultrasound administration, with the difference being muscle blood flow. Results. No differences between the control arm and the ultrasound-treated arm were found for muscle, skin, and forearm blood flow. Conclusion and Discussion. These results suggest that administration of continuous-wave ultrasound at the prescribed dosage had no effect on skeletal muscle blood flow for up to 30 minutes posttreatment. Thus, muscle hyperemia is probably not the primary mechanism responsible for the clinical benefits seen following the use of ultrasound as a therapeutic modality.

Key Words: Cutaneous laser Doppler • Muscle blood flow • Muscle hyperemia • Skin blood flow • Ultrasound • Venous occlusion plethysmography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Invited Commentary
Mark W Cornwall
Physical Therapy 1995 75: 149-150. [Abstract] [PDF]

Author Response
Steven E Robinson and Michael J Buono
Physical Therapy 1995 75: 150. [Abstract] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. Giombini, A. Di Cesare, M. R. Safran, R. Ciatti, and N. Maffulli
Short-term Effectiveness of Hyperthermia for Supraspinatus Tendinopathy in Athletes: A Short-term Randomized Controlled Study
Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2006; 34(8): 1247 - 1253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
K. G Baker, V. J Robertson, and F. A Duck
A Review of Therapeutic Ultrasound: Biophysical Effects
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2001; 81(7): 1351 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Physical Therapy Association.