PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 75, No. 11, November 1995, pp. 948-949

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, W. F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, W. F
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebral Palsy (Pediatrics)
Right arrow Down Syndrome
Right arrow Motor Development
Right arrow Neonates
Right arrow Tests and Measurements
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Invited Commentary

William F Boyce

WF Boyce, MSc, PT, is Assistant Professor, School of Rehabilitation Therapy and the Departments of Paediatrics and Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 (boycew@post.queensu.ca)

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

The desire to create and validate an instrument that can be used with confidence to conclusively demonstrate the effectiveness of treatment in infants receiving physical therapy is a laudable goal. Palisano et al have shown the merit of a sequential, step-by-step process in establishing the measurement properties of the Peabody Developmental Gross Motor Scale (PDMS-GM) for this purpose. They describe a detailed study in which they answer key questions for evaluative measures: Does the measure show changes in group scores over time? Do most infants show changes in their individual scores? Is the measure responsive to clinically important differences in gross motor skills, and can data from the study be used for sample-size calculations in clinical trials? This article, however, should be making only tentative conclusions for a variety of methodological reasons.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Validity of the Peabody Developmental Gross Motor Scale as an Evaluative Measure of Infants Receiving Physical Therapy
Robert J Palisano, Thubi H Kolobe, Stephen M Haley, Linda Pax Lowes, and Sandra L Jones
Physical Therapy 1995 75: 939-948. [Abstract] [PDF]

Author Response
Robert J Palisano, Thubi H Kolobe, Stephen M Haley, Linda Pax Lowes, and Sandra L Jones
Physical Therapy 1995 75: 950-951. [Abstract] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Physical Therapy Association.