PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 74, No. 9, September 1994, pp. 809-810

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shields, R. K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shields, R. K
Related Collections
Right arrow Injuries and Conditions: Low Back
Right arrow Injuries and Conditions: Spine
Right arrow Tests and Measurements
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Invited Commentary

Richard K Shields

RK Shields, PhD, PT, is Assistant Professor and Clinical Research Coordinator, Physical Therapy Graduate Program, The College of Medicine, The University of Iowa and University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 2600 Steindler Bldg, Iowa City, IA 52242

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

Maher and Adams present a unique study assessing the reliability of a manual technique commonly used by physical therapists. The authors raise serious questions about the reliability of the ability to assess lumbar vertebral stiffness using posteroanterior (PA) central pressure testing. Conversely, they report that the assessment of pain during PA pressures is highly reliable and may be the most important measure to focus on when performing these manual techniques. The authors make many attempts to keep this reliability study within the context of the clinical setting to enhance its generalizability or external validity. There are several issues, however, that this study does not address and that consequently affect the clinical implications and conclusions.

Reliability studies of this type are beneficial but artificial by nature, which limits their generalizability to true clinical practice....


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Reliability of Pain and Stiffness Assessments in Clinical Manual Lumbar Spine Examination
Christopher Maher and Roger Adams
Physical Therapy 1994 74: 801-809. [Abstract] [PDF]

Author Response
Christopher Maher and Roger Adams
Physical Therapy 1994 74: 810-811. [Abstract] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Physical Therapy Association.