PHYS THER
Vol. 74, No. 8, August 1994, pp. 748-751
Professional Perspectives |
Invited Commentary
James Gordon
J Gordon, EdD, PT, is Assistant Professor, Program in Physical Therapy, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032
This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.
Since Keele's seminal paper1 in 1968, the term "motor program" has become part of the vocabulary of theorists in motor control and motor learning, and, as Morris et al point out, the term has also become widespread in the clinical literature. Unfortunately, despite considerable theoretical development in the concept of a motor program (reviewed nicely by Morris et al), the term is still frequently used in its original formulation. That is, it is used to imply that when we learn a movement skill, we learn a specific set of muscle contractions. As Morris et al demonstrate, this assumption is simply untenable. Even small changes in the context in which an action takes place will radically affect the magnitudes and timing of muscle contractions necessary to carry out the act, and even which muscles will contract....

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Related Articles
-
Levels of Reduction
- Eugene Michels
Physical Therapy 1994 74: 1138-1139.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
-
Current Status of the Motor Program
- Meg E Morris, Jeffery J Summers, Thomas A Matyas, and Robert Iansek
Physical Therapy 1994 74: 738-748.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
-
Author Response
- Meg E Morris, Jeffery J Summers, Thomas A Matyas, and Robert Iansek
Physical Therapy 1994 74: 751-752.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
Copyright © 1994 by the American Physical Therapy Association.