PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 74, No. 2, February 1994, pp. 158-159

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, M. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, M. J
Related Collections
Right arrow Adaptive/Assistive Devices
Right arrow Gait Disorders
Right arrow Injuries and Conditions: Foot
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Invited Commentary

Michael J Mueller

MJ Mueller, PhD, PT, is Assistant Professor, Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, 509 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

Before addressing the important clinical implications this study provides, I will comment on selected methodological issues.

Inclusion criteria required subjects in this study to have a forefoot varus deformity of at least 8 degrees. Several authors1,2 have reported poor reliability for foot and ankle goniometric measurements. These studies, however, were conducted with testers having limited training with the measures. The reliability estimates obtained by Johanson et al, and my own experience,3,4 indicate that with adequate training, the measures can be performed reliably. Although the measures are important for describing the study population, the clinical usefulness of the measures is questionable and will be discussed later in this commentary.

I think the authors adequately describe the limitations of using two-dimensional motion analysis to study three-dimensional rear-foot kinematics. Several questions arise, however, about the methods for obtaining rear-foot kinematic measurements....


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Effects of Three Different Posting Methods on Controlling Abnormal Subtalar Pronation
Marie A Johanson, Robert Donatelli, Michael J Wooden, Paul D Andrew, and Gordon S Cummings
Physical Therapy 1994 74: 149-158. [Abstract] [PDF]

Author Response
Marie A Johanson, Robert Donatelli, Michael J Wooden, Paul D Andrew, and Gordon S Cummings
Physical Therapy 1994 74: 160-161. [Abstract] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
B Heiderscheit, J Hamill, and D Tiberio
A biomechanical perspective: do foot orthoses work?
Br. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2001; 35(1): 4 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Physical Therapy Association.