|
|
||||||||
Letters and Responses |
To the Editor:
I have just read with great interest the research report of Gowland et al entitled "Agonist and Antagonist Activity During Voluntary Upper-Limb Movement in Patients with Stroke" that appeared in the September 1992 issue of Physical Therapy and would like to add my comments.
In general, the treatment approach of Bobath is much broader than described in the article, and therefore the authors' criticism of this approach is not exact. Primarily, the Bobath concept is a way of thinking, its aim of treatment being the attainment of a normal quality of function. In order to achieve normal function, the treatment given must be of normal quality.
Many years ago, it was correctly claimed that, in order to attain normal coordinative movement, emphasis must be laid on inhibiting the surfeit of motor units taking part in that movement rather than recruiting other motor units for the same movement....
Related Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Physical Therapy 1992 72: 624-633.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |