|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Reports |
This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.
I would like to thank Dr Domholdt for providing additional insights on the topic of faculty turnover. She has raised several important points in her commentary. I would like to clarify some information related to several comments made by Dr Domholdt.
I agree with Dr Domholdt that complete control of faculty turnover is an unrealistic goal. Numerous turnover studies published in the economic and organizational behavior literature have attempted to determine the predictors of job turnover, with the implication that turnover needs to be prevented. Many positive consequences of job turnover, however, exist for the organization and individual. Turnover may produce increased innovation, employee mobility and morale, organizational effectiveness, and decreased employee conflict.1 An optimal level of turnover may exist that balances the negative and positive consequences of turnover.
Dr Domholdt raises several points regarding the relationship between salary and faculty turnover that need additional clarification....
Related Articles
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Physical Therapy 1993 73: 243-251.
Physical Therapy 1993 73: 251-252.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |