PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 73, No. 2, February 1993, pp. 98-100

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mattingly, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mattingly, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Research: Other
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Professional Perspectives

Commentary

Cheryl Mattingly

C Mattingly, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy (M/C 811), University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W Taylor St, Chicago, IL 60612

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

Qualitative research methods have traditionally dominated history, anthropology, literary criticism, and some schools of sociology and psychology. Increasingly, these methods are finding a place in professional disciplines, from education to medicine, where once only quantitative paradigms reigned. In areas where qualitative research is still rare, qualitative researchers often must answer objections about the "science" of their practice, questions that historians, anthropologists, and literary theorists have often been able to avoid because such methods are common in their fields. Qualitative researchers in quantitatively driven disciplines characteristically find themselves turning to philosophy to defend their methods; most often they look to phenomenology and modern hermeneutics, which offer sustained arguments about the need for a different kind of science for the study of human activity, one designed to ferret out the personal, social, and cultural meanings persons attach to the actions they take.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Author Response
Katherine F Shepard, Gail M Jensen, Beverly J Schmoll, Laurita M Hack, and Janet Gwyer
Physical Therapy 1993 73: 100-101. [Abstract] [PDF]

Alternative Approaches to Research in Physical Therapy: Positivism and Phenomenology
Katherine F Shepard, Gail M Jensen, Beverly J Schmoll, Laurita M Hack, and Janet Gwyer
Physical Therapy 1993 73: 88-97. [Abstract] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Physical Therapy Association.