PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 73, No. 2, February 1993, pp. 113-114

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldsmith, C. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldsmith, C. H
Related Collections
Right arrow Statistics
Right arrow Tests and Measurements
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Professional Perspectives

Commentary

Charles H Goldsmith

CH Goldsmith, PhD, is Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5, and Honorary Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H1

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

Sim and Arnell have done a credible job of reviewing reliability and validity issues in physical therapy research. The examples that they use to illustrate various aspects of reliability, validity, and bias are useful to bring out the necessary nuances of developing a measurement procedure.

Although most of the key issues have been developed in the article, it would have been nice if the investigators had discussed the purpose of the measurement process, specifically, Is it diagnostic, discriminatory, or evaluative? A useful reference to describe these purposes is the article by Kirshner and Guyatt.1 It is possible that developers of measurement methods should look at responsiveness, particularly for evaluating therapies.

The context of the measurement does make the properties that are required to be illustrated for a measurement process slightly different....


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Measurement Validity in Physical Therapy Research
Julius Sim and Peggy Arnell
Physical Therapy 1993 73: 102-110. [Abstract] [PDF]

Commentary
Suzann K Campbell
Physical Therapy 1993 73: 110-113. [Abstract] [PDF]

Commentary
Otto D Payton
Physical Therapy 1993 73: 114-115. [Abstract] [PDF]

Author Response
Julius Sim and Peggy Arnell
Physical Therapy 1993 73: 115. [Abstract] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Physical Therapy Association.