HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sim, J. Articles by Arnell, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sim, J. Articles by Arnell, P. Related Collections Statistics Perspectives Tests and Measurements Related Articles Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Measurement Validity in Physical Therapy Research

J Sim, PT, is Principal Lecturer in Health Sciences, School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, United Kingdom.
P Arnell, PhD, PT, is Manager for Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Postgraduate Medicine and Dentistry, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom.

This article considers the role of measurement validity within physical therapy research. The concept of measurement validity is identified as a component of internal validity, and it is differentiated from the notion of reliability; these concepts are related to systematic and random sources of error, respectively. Using examples from physical therapy and rehabilitation, four main types of validity are reviewed: face validity, criterion-related validity, content validity, and construct validity. The differing implications of these types of validity for quantitative and qualitative research are discussed. Three principal areas of concern are then addressed, based on a critical discussion of selected examples from the literature. First, it is argued that validity is often poorly distinguished from the allied concept of reliability and that purported claims for validity often only demonstrate reliability. Second, it is claimed that validity is too often neglected in favor of reliability, and specific examples relating to gait analysis are put forward to support this argument. Third, some of the methodological difficulties that may occur when attempts are made to demonstrate validity are considered. The article concludes with a plea for a closer focus on the issue of measurement validity within physical therapy research.

Key Words: Research • Research design • Tests and measurements, general

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Commentary

Suzann K Campbell
Physical Therapy 1993 73: 110-113. [Abstract] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. A. Colburn Biomarkers in Drug Discovery and Development: From Target Identification through Drug Marketing J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 1, 2003; 43(4): 329 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Feys, M Duportail, D Kos, P Van Aschand, and P Ketelaer Validity of the TEMPA for the measurement of upper limb function in multiple sclerosis Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2002; 16(2): 166 - 173. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Prosser and A. Canby Further validation of the Elderly Mobility Scale for measurement of mobility of hospitalized elderly people Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1997; 11(4): 338 - 343. [Abstract] [PDF]