|
|
||||||||
Letters and Responses |
To the Editor:
One of the natural consequences of the great diversity among academic programs in physical therapy is the expression of equally diverse opinions concerning the philosophy and design of their curricula. Recently, controversy has centered on the value of mandatory entry-level student research projects within physical therapy instructional programs, a debate nourished by Dr Rothstein's editorial in the May 1992 issue of Physical Therapy. I appreciate this opportunity to express my viewpoint in response to his opinion.
Nearly 4 years ago, I was privileged to join the faculty of a Division of Physical Therapy as its only full-time member not trained as a physical therapist. Even before my hiring, my physical therapist colleagues knew of the esteem I held for, and the value I placed upon, the physical therapy practitioner, worth acknowledged long before it was fashionable for an exercise physiologist to do so....
Related Articles
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Physical Therapy 1992 72: 608-609.
Physical Therapy 1992 72: 332-334.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |