|
|
||||||||
Research Reports |
RJ Palisano, ScD, PT, is Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Programs in Physical Therapy, Hahnemann University, MS 502, Broad and Vine Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192 (USA).
SM Haley, PhD, PT, is Assistant Professor, Tufts University School of Medicine, and Acting Director, Research and Training Center in Rehabilitation and Head Trauma, New England Medical Center Hospitals, Boston, MA 02111.
DA Brown, PT, PCS, is a doctoral candidate in the Program in Pediatric Physical Therapy, Hahnemann University, and Supervisor of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, South Dakota Developmental Center, Custer, SD 57730.
Goal attainment scaling (GAS) is an individualized criterion-referenced measure of change that has several unique features, compared with the behavioral objective, and five possible levels of attainment for each goal. The validity of GAS as a measure of motor change was investigated in 65 infants, 3 to 30 months of age, with motor delays. For each infant, two goals to be attained within a 6-month period of intervention were established. After the 6-month period, the mean GAS T-score of 55.4 was significantly higher than the expected mean of 50. This finding indicated that the infants' motor change exceeded the therapists' expectations. Neither the type nor the category of goal influenced the therapists' ability to select outcomes that the infants were capable of achieving. Because moderate and low correlations were found between GAS T-scores and Peabody gross motor and fine motor change scores, the two assessments appear to measure different aspects of motor development. Selected child, family, and program variables were examined as sources of bias in GAS T-scores. Motor delay was the only variable that biased GAS T-scores; infants who were less delayed had higher GAS T-scores. The results indicate that GAS was responsive to change in individualized motor goals and support the model of GAS as an idiosyncratic measure. The unique features of GAS offer advantages for measurement of motor change compared with the behavioral objective and norm-referenced developmental scales.
Key Words: Early intervention Evaluation Goal attainment scaling Measurement Physical therapy
Related Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Physical Therapy 1993 73: 123.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J Palisano A Collaborative Model of Service Delivery for Children With Movement Disorders: A Framework for Evidence-Based Decision Making Physical Therapy, September 1, 2006; 86(9): 1295 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Steenbeek, A. Meester-Delver, J. G Becher, and G. J Lankhorst The effect of botulinum toxin type A treatment of the lower extremity on the level of functional abilities in children with cerebral palsy: evaluation with goal attainment scaling Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2005; 19(3): 274 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C Heathcock, A. N Bhat, M. A Lobo, and J. Galloway The Performance of Infants Born Preterm and Full-term in the Mobile Paradigm: Learning and Memory Physical Therapy, September 1, 2004; 84(9): 808 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |