|
|
||||||||
Editor's Notes |
This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.
When it comes to "diversity," physical therapy curricula define the term. There are many common elements to our curricula as well—some good, some bad, some inconsequential. I share the view with many of my colleagues that each program should serve the primary purpose of developing thinking, capable, scientific practitioners prepared to practice without referral. This alone is a mighty challenge. But then we compound the challenge by adding unrealistic burdens to our education programs that not only interfere with the students' preparation, but also with the faculty's ability to be productive academicians. Required research projects for entry-level students are a good example.
In spite of their noble intent, required projects distract students from more relevant issues and give students a false impression of the research process....
Related Articles
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Physical Therapy 1992 72: 674-675.
Physical Therapy 1992 72: 605-608.
Physical Therapy 1992 72: 608-609.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. H Connolly, N. S Lupinnaci, and A. J Bush Changes in Attitudes and Perceptions About Research in Physical Therapy Among Professional Physical Therapist Students and New Graduates Physical Therapy, May 1, 2001; 81(5): 1127 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |