PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 72, No. 5, May 1992, pp. 332-334

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rothstein, J. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rothstein, J. M
Related Collections
Right arrow Professional Issues
Right arrow All Editorials
Right arrow Jules Rothstein
Right arrow Physical Therapist Education
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Editor's Notes

Living Without Student Research Projects

Jules M Rothstein, PhD, PT, Editor

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

When it comes to "diversity," physical therapy curricula define the term. There are many common elements to our curricula as well—some good, some bad, some inconsequential. I share the view with many of my colleagues that each program should serve the primary purpose of developing thinking, capable, scientific practitioners prepared to practice without referral. This alone is a mighty challenge. But then we compound the challenge by adding unrealistic burdens to our education programs that not only interfere with the students' preparation, but also with the faculty's ability to be productive academicians. Required research projects for entry-level students are a good example.

In spite of their noble intent, required projects distract students from more relevant issues and give students a false impression of the research process....


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Living Without Student Research Projects
J Greg Anson, T Richard Nichols, and Jules M Rothstein
Physical Therapy 1992 72: 674-675. [Abstract] [PDF]

In Support of Student Research
Mark S Nash, Sherrill H Hayes, and Jules M Rothstein
Physical Therapy 1992 72: 605-608. [Abstract] [PDF]

More Support for Student Research
Linda D Crane, Penny Kroll, Kathleen A Curtis, Susan K Lindeblad, Carol M Davis, Rose Marie Rine, Chukuka S Enwemeka, Kathryn E Roach, Ira M Fiebert, Charlotte W Silver, Robert S Gailey, Jr, Neil I Spielholz, and Jules M Rothstein
Physical Therapy 1992 72: 608-609. [Abstract] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
B. H Connolly, N. S Lupinnaci, and A. J Bush
Changes in Attitudes and Perceptions About Research in Physical Therapy Among Professional Physical Therapist Students and New Graduates
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2001; 81(5): 1127 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Physical Therapy Association.