PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 72, No. 2, February 1992, pp. 92-94

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rothstein, J. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rothstein, J. M
Related Collections
Right arrow Professional Issues
Right arrow All Editorials
Right arrow Jules Rothstein
Right arrow Physical Therapist Education
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Editor's Notes

Physical Therapy Research: Academic Inadequacies

Jules M Rothstein, PhD, PT, Editor

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

Academicians tend to be the primary producers of research in professions. Presumably these persons have the training, facilities, and other resources necessary to conduct research. In our profession, many academicians have made substantial contributions to our theoretical and clinical literature, but in general the physical therapy academic community has not adequately fulfilled its role in the area of research, particularly in the area of clinical research.

This journal and other journals geared toward physical therapy have published too many studies that dealt with clinical issues through the testing of healthy or nondisabled subjects. All too often these subjects are physical therapy students. We still receive many articles that have little or no clinical relevance because of the types of subjects being tested, the conditions under which the testing occurred, or the scope of the study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Academics and Clinical Research
Pamela A Stanton
Physical Therapy 1992 72: 396. [Abstract] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
H. B. Menz
A Retrospective Analysis of JAPMA Publication Patterns, 1991-2000
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 308 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
H. B. Menz
Publication Patterns and Perceptions of the Australian Podiatric Medical Faculty
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, April 1, 2001; 91(4): 210 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Physical Therapy Association.