|
|
||||||||
Editor's Notes |
This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.
Academicians tend to be the primary producers of research in professions. Presumably these persons have the training, facilities, and other resources necessary to conduct research. In our profession, many academicians have made substantial contributions to our theoretical and clinical literature, but in general the physical therapy academic community has not adequately fulfilled its role in the area of research, particularly in the area of clinical research.
This journal and other journals geared toward physical therapy have published too many studies that dealt with clinical issues through the testing of healthy or nondisabled subjects. All too often these subjects are physical therapy students. We still receive many articles that have little or no clinical relevance because of the types of subjects being tested, the conditions under which the testing occurred, or the scope of the study.
Related Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Physical Therapy 1992 72: 396.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. B. Menz A Retrospective Analysis of JAPMA Publication Patterns, 1991-2000 J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 308 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. B. Menz Publication Patterns and Perceptions of the Australian Podiatric Medical Faculty J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, April 1, 2001; 91(4): 210 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |