PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 71, No. 9, September 1991, pp. 675-676

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michlovitz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Michlovitz, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Physical Agents/Modalities
Right arrow Musculoskeletal System/Orthopedic: Other
Right arrow Pharmacology
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Commentary

Susan Michlovitz

S Michlovitz, MS, PT, is Clinical Associate Professor, Hahnemann University, Programs in Physical Therapy, Mail Stop 502, Broad and Vine, Philadelphia, PA 19102

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

I am pleased to have been invited to provide a commentary on the article by Ciccone et al. Phonophoresis is a timely topic, because its use, as that of many physical agents, waxes and wanes from decade to decade. To the best of my knowledge, the increased interest in and use of phonophoresis began in the mid-1990s, and phonophoresis now appears to be a frequent choice as an adjunct to the management of inflammatory conditions affecting periarticular structures (eg, tendinitis). The question of the efficacy and effectiveness of this technique is one that remains unanswered, even though anecdotal evidence exists to justify the continued use of phonophoresis. Ciccone et al have chosen nondisabled subjects as a model for simulating musculoskeletal pain and stiffness in order to study the effects of phonophoresis with salicylate in delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Effects of Ultrasound and Trolamine Salicylate Phonophoresis on Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness
Charles D Ciccone, Brian G Leggin, and John J Callamaro
Physical Therapy 1991 71: 666-675. [Abstract] [PDF]

Author Response
Charles D Ciccone, Brian G Leggin, and John J Callamaro
Physical Therapy 1991 71: 676-678. [Abstract] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Physical Therapy Association.