PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 71, No. 8, August 1991, pp. 577-578

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haley, S. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haley, S. M
Related Collections
Right arrow Adaptive/Assistive Devices
Right arrow Gait Disorders
Right arrow Neurology/Neuromuscular System: Other
Right arrow Pediatrics: Other
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Reports

Commentary

Stephen M Haley

SM Haley, PhD, PT, is Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, New England Medical Center Hospitals, 750 Washington St, #75 K/R, Boston, MA 02111

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

Although we often assume that the sole domain of physical therapy is the motor function of our patients, in reality our focus is the person who has a movement limitation. Our traditional reluctance to broaden our scope of concern to the entire realm of functioning of the patient in his or her relevant environment has often led to poorly conceptualized treatment plans and less-than-optimal outcomes. In spite of the frequent interdisciplinary nature of our work in school systems and other community environments, many pediatric physical therapists have been slow to place mobility goals in the proper social and educational perspectives.

Franks and colleagues are to be commended for examining the effects of ambulation with an assistive device and wheelchair propulsion on preacademic performance of children with myelomeningocele....


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

The Effect of Walking with an Assistive Device and Using a Wheelchair on School Performance in Students with Myelomeningocele
Catherine A Franks, Robert J Palisano, and Joan C Darbee
Physical Therapy 1991 71: 570-577. [Abstract] [PDF]

Author Response
Catherine A Franks, Robert J Palisano, and Joan C Darbee
Physical Therapy 1991 71: 579. [Abstract] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
M. J. Barry
Physical Therapy Interventions for Patients With Movement Disorders due to Cerebral Palsy
J Child Neurol, November 1, 1996; 11(1_suppl): S51 - S60.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Physical Therapy Association.