PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 70, No. 6, June 1990, pp. 389-393

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, C. A
Right arrow Articles by Versluis, T. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, C. A
Right arrow Articles by Versluis, T. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Case Studies

Management of an Above-Knee Amputee with Complex Medical Problems Using the CAT-CAM Prosthesis

Catherine A Mitchell and Tamara L Versluis

C Mitchell, MHS, PT, is Supervisory Physical Therapist, Belleville Memorial Hospital, 4501 N Park Dr, Belleville, IL 62221. She was Senior Physical Therapist, Irene Walter Johnson Rehabilitation Institute, 509 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110, when this report was written.
T Versluis, PT, is Senior Physical Therapist, Irene Walter Johnson Rehabilitation Institute, 509 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110 (USA).

The purpose of this case report is to 1) briefly describe the traditional above-knee (AK) quadrilateral socket, 2) describe the contoured adducted trochanteric-controlled alignment method (CAT-CAM) socket, 3) describe the management of a patient with a temporary CAT-CAM prosthesis, and 4) explain how the CAT-CAM prosthesis approach has resolved a medically complex clinical problem. The 49-year-old patient in this case study received a left AK amputation in 1984 and was provided with a quadrilateral socket. She abandoned this prosthesis after 2 years because of her dissatisfaction with the device (ie, poor fit, awkwardness, excessive energy expenditure) and because of her compromised cardiac condition. The patient was fitted with a CAT-CAM prosthesis in 1988 and reported increased comfort, ease of donning and doffing, and increased gait efficiency with the CAT-CAM prosthesis as compared with the quadrilateral socket. The patient required 19 days of prosthetic training and was discharged independent in ambulation and transfers using two straight canes. We consider the CAT-CAM prosthesis an improvement over the quadrilateral socket for increasing ambulation independence in the individual with AK amputation and other medical complications.

Key Words: Ambulation aids, general • Amputations, prosthetics • Amputees • Orthotics/splints/casts, lower extremity • Prosthesis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Physical Therapy Association.