|
|
||||||||
Articles |
M Halaney, MS, PT, is Instructor, School of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman's University, 1130 MD Anderson Blvd, Houston, TX 77030. She was a student, Program in Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, when this study was conducted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for her master's degree.
J Carey, PhD, is Assistant Director and Assistant Professor, Physical Therapy Program, Mayo Clinic, 108 Guggenheim Bldg, Rochester, MN 55905. He was Instructor, Program in Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota, PO Box 388 UMHC, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, when this study was conducted.
The purpose of this descriptive study was to investigate differences in tracking ability between the involved and uninvolved hands of hemiparetic (n = 10) and healthy (n = 10) subjects. The subjects tracked a sine-wave target pattern by flexing and extending their index finger metacarpophalangeal joints. The amplitudes of the target patterns were proportional to each subject's active range of motion. The root-mean-square (RMS) of the vertical distance between the target and response lines was expressed as a percentage of the RMS of the target pattern and subtracted from 100 to give an index of each subject's accuracy. The authors used t tests to compare the uninvolved and involved hands of the hemiparetic subjects (p > .05), the dominant and nondominant hands of the healthy subjects (p > .05), and the uninvolved hands of the hemiparetic subjects with the dominant hands of the healthy subjects (p < .005). This study indicates that within the available active ROM, finger tracking ability is impaired bilaterally in hemiparetic subjects. The implication for physical therapists is that treatment strategies for improving motor control should be directed bilaterally.
Key Words: Hand Hemiplegia, evaluation Motor skills Psychomotor performance Tests and measurements, functional
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Knutson, T. Z. Hisel, M. Y. Harley, and J. Chae A Novel Functional Electrical Stimulation Treatment for Recovery of Hand Function in Hemiplegia: 12-Week Pilot Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 17 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Turk, S. V. Notley, R. M. Pickering, D. M. Simpson, P. A. Wright, and J. H. Burridge Reliability and Sensitivity of a Wrist Rig to Measure Motor Control and Spasticity in Poststroke Hemiplegia Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 684 - 696. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Laufer, L. Gattenio, E. Parnas, D. Sinai, Y. Sorek, and R. Dickstein Time-Related Changes in Motor Performance of the Upper Extremity Ipsilateral to the Side of the Lesion in Stroke Survivors Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2001; 15(3): 167 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ada, C. Canning, and T. Dwyer Effect of muscle length on strength and dexterity after stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2000; 14(1): 55 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yaretzky, S. Raviv, T. Jacob, Y. Netz, M. Low, and B. Finkeltov Ipsilateral upper and lower extremity response time among stroke patients Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1994; 8(4): 293 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |