PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 69, No. 3, March 1989, pp. 237-238

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stratford, P. W
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, D. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stratford, P. W
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, D. E
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Letters and Responses

Confidence Limits for Your ICC


This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

To the Editor:

Measuring and reporting an index of reliability has become a requirement for contributors to Physical Therapy.1 Currently, the reliability index most frequently cited in the physical therapy literature is the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and guidelines have been established to help potential authors identify the type of ICC reported in their work.2,3 The application of these guidelines has aided readers in their interpretation of the ICC; however, I suggest that an area of deficiency continues to exist. Although it is a requisite practice to report the type of ICC, no standard exists for reporting the confidence one has in the magnitude of the ICC. For example, although the ICC was cited frequently in the most recent volume of Physical Therapy, the same statement cannot be made concerning the application of formal statistical tests supporting the magnitude of the reported coefficients. When statistical tests were applied, the reporting focused solely on the p value....


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Reliability Discussion Required
Robert Lamb, Richard Bohannon, Rebecca L Craik, Susan Effgen, Claire Kispert, Harry G Knecht, Kay Shepard, and Gary L Soderberg
Physical Therapy 1987 67: 501. [Abstract] [PDF]

Declare Your ICC Type
David E Krebs
Physical Therapy 1986 66: 1431. [Abstract] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
R. Trevethan
Self-assessment of Foot Health: Requirements, Issues, Practicalities, and Challenges
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, September 1, 2009; 99(5): 460 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
T. Kaasa, J. Wessel, J. Darrah, and E. Bruera
Inter-rater reliability of formally trained and self-trained raters using the Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2000; 14(6): 509 - 517.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Physical Therapy Association.