PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 69, No. 10, October 1989, pp. 826-833

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coy, J. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coy, J. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Articles

Autonomy-Based Informed Consent: Ethical Implications for Patient Noncompliance

Janet A Coy

J Coy, MA, PT, is Assistant Professor, Program in Physical Therapy, State University of New York Health Science Center at Syracuse, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210 (USA). She was Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY 14850, when this article was written.

The problems presented by the noncompliant patient are not new to health care professionals, including physical therapists. Although many of the factors that influence the incidence of noncompliance have been studied, important ethical concerns are often overlooked. This fact has led many health care professionals to make the following assumptions: 1) All cases of noncompliance are problems in need of a solution, 2) the solution to the problem of noncompliance is compliance, 3) all instances of compliance are nonproblematical, and 4) the locus of the problem of noncompliance is the patient. In this article, the issue of patient noncompliance is examined based on an analysis of the moral foundations of informed consent. The above assumptions are shown to be problematic from the moral point of view. Three patient cases are presented to highlight some of the implications for physical therapists who encounter noncompliant patients. Understanding the moral foundation of informed consent can help guide therapists in their communication with all patients, and especially in their interactions with noncompliant patients.

Key Words: Ethics • Informed consent • Patient compliance • Physical therapy profession, professional issues


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. L. Swisher
A Retrospective Analysis of Ethics Knowledge in Physical Therapy (1970-2000)
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2002; 82(7): 692 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Sim
Respect for autonomy: issues in neurological rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 1998; 12(1): 3 - 10.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
K. N. Moore
Compliance or Collaboration? the Meaning for the Patient
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 1995; 2(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Physical Therapy Association.