HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wong, R. A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wong, R. A Related Collections Related Article Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

High Voltage Versus Low Voltage Electrical Stimulation: Force of Induced Muscle Contraction and Perceived Discomfort in Healthy Subjects

Ms. Wong is Assistant Professor of Physical Therapy, University of Connecticut, School of Allied Health Professions, Box U-101, 358 Mansfield Rd, Storrs, CT 06268 (USA).

High voltage pulsed galvanic stimulation (HVPGS) and low voltage neuromuscular stimulation (LVNMS) techniques were compared for peak torque of an induced isometric contraction, perceived discomfort, and subjective preference of treatment. The high voltage current used a 40-µsec monophasic waveform, and the low voltage current used a 300-µsec biphasic waveform. Both currents used a pulse rate of 50 pps. Both HVPGS and LVNMS were administered to one muscle group, either knee extensors or plantar flexors, of 24 healthy subjects. An isokinetic dynamometer was used to assess peak torque. The perceived discomfort experienced with each type of electrical stimulation was quantified by the use of a visual analog scale. For all dependent measures, data first were analyzed for the whole treatment group and then analyzed for each subgroup. Correlated t tests for the whole group and the plantar flexor muscle subgroup demonstrated that 1) HVPGS produced a significantly greater average peak force of muscle contraction than LVNMS and 2) HVPGS was perceived to be significantly less uncomfortable than LVNMS. No significant differences were found between treatments in the knee extensor muscle subgroup for these dependent variables. Chi-square analysis revealed a subject preference for HVPGS in the whole group and in both subgroups. This study indicates that HVPGS can produce a stronger, less uncomfortable, induced isometric muscle contraction than LVNMS.

Key Words: Electric stimulation • Muscle contraction • Muscles

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

High Voltage Versus Low Voltage

William S Quillen and Rita A Wong
Physical Therapy 1986 66: 1968. [Abstract] [PDF]