PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 65, No. 4, April 1985, pp. 470-473

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Echternach, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Levy, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Echternach, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Levy, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research

Evaluation of Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity Testing of the Superficial Radial Nerve

John L Echternach and Francis Levy

Dr. Echternach is Chairman, Department of Community Health Professions, and Director, Program in Physical Therapy, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23508 (USA).
Mr. Levy is Staff Physical Therapist, Chesapeake Health Department, PO Box 1463, Chesapeake, VA 23320.

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the methods for examining the superficial radial nerve and to compare velocities and amplitudes of responses based on electrode shape and placement and site of stimulation. We selected 51 subjects with a mean age of 37 years from a healthy group. Twenty additional subjects with a mean age of 28 were also examined. Nerve conduction was done by stimulating over the dorsal forearm and lateral arm and recording from the superficial radial nerve where its branches cross the extensor pollicis longus tendon. The second group of subjects were stimulated at the same site and also at the elbow. Recording was done with a rectangular-shaped electrode placed in the area between the extensor pollicis longus and the extensor pollicis brevis tendons. We found a mean conduction velocity of 61 m/sec ± 4.91 in the first group with a mean amplitude of response of 36.7 µV ± 11.7 when we stimulated at the forearm site and 4.06 µV ± 6.75 when we stimulated at the lateral arm site. In the second group of subjects, conduction velocity from lateral arm to forearm site was 63 m/sec ± 4.50; from the lateral arm to elbow, 66 m/sec ± 10.4; and from the elbow to the forearm site, 64 m/sec ± 9.71. Amplitudes of response were 43.8 µV ± 14.45 at the forearm stimulation site, 18.06 ± µV ± 7.37 at the elbow site, and 6.7 µV ± 4.25 at the lateral arm site. We compared the mean velocities from the two methods and found no significant differences. Comparison of the mean amplitudes of response were significantly different (p = .01) at both the forearm and the lateral arm. A method for performing nerve conduction velocity on the superficial radial nerve is presented.

Key Words: Electric stimulation • Physical therapy • Radial nerve


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Physical Therapy Association.