PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 65, No. 3, March 1985, pp. 314-336

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gersh, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, S. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gersh, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, S. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Practice

Applications of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Pain: State-of-the-Art Update

Meryl Roth Gersh and Steven L Wolf

Mrs. Gersh is a physical therapist at St. Luke's Memorial Hospital, S 711 Cowley St, Box 288, Spokane, WA 99210.
Dr. Wolf is Associate Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1441 Clifton Rd, NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 (USA) and a senior investigator, Emory University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Atlanta, GA.

Numerous publications devoted to the topic of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) have appeared since the presentation of a special issue of PHYSICAL THERAPY (December, 1978). This update article addresses contemporary information on efficacy, mode of application, treatment outcomes, and neurophysiological mechanisms relevant to this modality. Investigators have become far more specific when presenting this information in the current literature on treating acute pain conditions with TENS than they were in the literature for the 1978 special issue. Improvement has been made in providing specific details to enable replication of TENS stimulating characteristics among patients with chronic pain; yet several clinical researchers still fail to evaluate treatment outcomes adequately. Perhaps the greatest advances in our understanding of TENS involve the recent development of mechanisms that might account for how different types of TENS work. Suggestions for predicting patient responses to TENS and for avenues of future inquiry are offered.

Key Words: Electric stimulation • Pain • Physical therapy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J Al-Smadi, K Warke, I Wilson, A F L Cramp, G Noble, D M Walsh, and A S Lowe-Strong
A pilot investigation of the hypoalgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation upon low back pain in people with multiple sclerosis
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2003; 17(7): 742 - 749.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med SciHome page
Z. Khalil and M. Merhi
Effects of Aging on Neurogenic Vasodilator Responses Evoked by Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation: Relevance to Wound Healing
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, June 1, 2000; 55(6): B257 - B263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
P. Mattison
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of painful muscle spasm in patients with multiple sclerosis
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 1993; 7(1): 45 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Physical Therapy Association.