PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 65, No. 1, January 1985, pp. 46-47

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bohannon, R. W
Right arrow Articles by Larkin, P. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bohannon, R. W
Right arrow Articles by Larkin, P. A
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Practice

Cybex® II Isokinetic Dynamometer for the Documentation of Spasticity: Suggestion from the Field

Richard W Bohannon and Patricia A Larkin

Mr. Bohannon is Chief, Department of Physical Therapy, Southeastern Regional Rehabilitation Center, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, NC 28302 (USA).
Ms. Larkin is Supervisor, Rehabilitation Team, Southeastern Regional Rehabilitation Center.

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

Recent studies involving patients with CNS lesions have clearly demonstrated that agonist paresis rather than antagonist spasticity is the primary factor limiting torque production.1,2 The presence of spasticity can, nonetheless, be important because of its effect on the quality of movement and because of the propensity of spastic muscles toward contracture.3 Therefore, methods for more precisely documenting spasticity remain of value to those clinicians who include among their therapeutic goals the reduction of spasticity. Among the methods proposed for measuring spasticity (resistance to passive movement) are the Ashworth test4 and the goniometric pendulum test.5–7 Alfieri reported that the Ashworth test can provide an indication of therapeutic efficacy but is of limited objectivity because it uses an ordinal scale.8 The pendulum test, on the other hand, provides a more objective measurement on a continuous ratio scale....


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Measuring Spasticity with an Isokinetic Dynamometer
Richard W Bohannon, Patricia A Larkin, Melissa B Smith, Melissa G Horton, and Teleena L Kelly
Physical Therapy 1985 65: 782. [Abstract] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
Z. Dvir and E. Panturin
Measurement of spasticity and associated reactions in stroke patients before and after physiotherapeutic intervention
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 1993; 7(1): 15 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Physical Therapy Association.